EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT SCHEMES FOR PATIENTS WITH CRYPTOCOCCAL MENINGOENCEPHALITIS AND HIV INFECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2727.2021.3.12489Keywords:
HIV infection, cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, amphotericin B deoxycholate, fluconazole, acute kidney injuryAbstract
In Ukraine the problem of effective and safe treatment of HIV infected patients with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis has not been resolved due to the unavailability of flucytosine and the extremely limited use of amphotericin B deoxycholate.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using fluconazole monotherapy in comparison with the combination of amphotericin B deoxycholate and fluconazole for the treatment of patients with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis associated with HIV infection.
Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective, cohort study that included 71 adult patients. The patients were divided into two groups – group 1 included 49 people who received treatment with a combination of amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7–1 mg/kg body weight per day intravenously) and fluconazole (800 mg per day). Group 2 included 22 patients treated with high doses of fluconazole (800–1200 mg per day) as monotherapy. The duration of induction therapy was at least two weeks in both groups. In the consolidation phase patients received fluconazole 400 mg daily for eight weeks. The lethality count was used in the groups after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment to evaluate its efficacy. The safety assessment included the detection of toxic effects, severe adverse reactions and monitoring of laboratory parameters during the observation period.
Results and discussion. In 14 days of treatment the mortality rates in group 2 were 3.6 times less than in group 1 – 4.5 % (95 % CI: 0.1–22.8 %) and 16.3 % (95 % CI: 7.3–23.7 %), respectively, but they did not differ (P=0.17) statistically. On the day 25 of treatment 14/49 (28.5 %) died in group 1, while in group 2 only 2/22 (9 %), but by the end of the tenth week of observation, the mortality rates in both groups were equal (P=0.76) – 36.4 % (95 % CI: 17.2–59.3 %) versus 32.6 % (95 % CI: 20–47.5 % ). During this period the overall cumulative survival rate also did not differ (P=0.47) and amounted 67.1 % in group 1 and 57.2 % in group 2. A significant difference (P<0.01) in terms of the incidence of acute kidney injury was recorded among the adverse reactions during 10 weeks of treatment – 87 % in group 1 compared to 27 % in group 2.
Conclusions. The effectiveness of an alternative treatment regimen for patients with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis associated with HIV infection using fluconazole monotherapy does not differ (P=0.17) from the combination of amphotericin B deoxycholate plus fluconazole and 10-week mortality in groups is 36.4 % (95 % CI: 17.2–59.3 %) and 32.6 % (95 % CI: 20–47.5 %) respectively. The incidence of acute kidney injury with amphotericin B deoxycholate is 87 % compared to 27 % with fluconazole monotherapy.
References
WHO (2018). Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and management of cryptococcal disease in HIV-infected adults, adolescents and children. (Geneva: World Health Organisation).
EACS (2020). Treatment Guidelines version 10.1, PART VI, 108-109.
Rajasingham, R., Smith, R.M., Park, B.J., Jarvis, J.N., Govender, N.P., Chiller, T.M., Denning, D.W., Loyse, A., & Boulware, D.R. (2017). Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 17 (8), 873-881.
Tenforde, M.W., Shapiro, A.E., Rouse, B., Jarvis, J.N., Li, T., Eshun-Wilson, I., & Ford, N. (2018). Treatment for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7 (7), CD005647.
Tenforde, M.W., Gertz, A.M., Lawrence, D.S., Wills, N.K., Guthrie, B.L., Farquhar, C., & Jarvis, J.N. (2020). Mortality from HIV-associated meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23 (1), e25416.
Li, Y., Huang, X., Qin, Y., Wu, H., Yan, X., & Chen, Y. (2020). What is the most appropriate induction regimen for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis when the recommended regimen is not available? Evidence from a network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, 963.
Loyse, A., Burry, J., Cohn, J., Ford, N., Chiller, T., Ribeiro, I., Koulla-Shiro, S., et al. (2019). Leave no one behind: response to new evidence and guidelines for the management of cryptococcal meningitis in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 19 (4), e143-e147.
Pasquier, E., Kunda, J., De Beaudrap, P., Loyse, A., Temfack, E., Molloy, S.F., Harrison, T.S., & Lortholary, O. (2018). Long-term Mortality and Disability in Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Systematic Literature Review. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 66 (7), 1122-1132.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Infectious Diseases

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
- Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи, яка через [ВКАЖІТЬ ПЕРІОД ЧАСУ] з дати публікації автоматично стає доступною на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.

- Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2021-11-22
Published 2021-11-29