Features Of The Paretic Limb Spasticity And Function Level Correlation After Different Types Of Neurotransplantation On The Model Of Spinal Cord Injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2017.1.7247Keywords:
spinal cord injury, post-traumatic spasticity syndrome, spinal cord function recovery, tissue neurotransplantation, correlation.Abstract
The aim of the work – to explore the correlation of spasticity and function level in the paretic limb after different types of neurotransplantation on the model of spinal cord injury.
Materials and Methods. Animals – white inbred rats (males, 5.5 months, ~ 350 g); groups: “control” – the left-side spinal cord hemisection at T11 (n=16), “TOBT” – analogous spinal cord injury + immediate allogenic homotopical transplantation of the olfactory bulb tissue (n=34), “TFCT” – analogous spinal cord injury + immediate allogenic homotopical transplantation of a fetal (E18) cerebellum tissue (n=15); “TFKT” – analogous spinal cord injury + immediate allogenic homotopical transplantation of a fetal (E18) kidney tissue (n=8). Monitoring of the ipsilateral hind limb (IHL) function and spasticity indicator (FI and SI respectively) – Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scale and Ashworth scale, respectively.
Results and Discussion. TOBT provides reliable advantage of IHL FI with a maximum in 3rd week (3.7 ± 0.5 points BBB), followed by a gradual decrease to 2.4±0.6 points BBB (24th week), reduces the severity of spasticity in the early period of trauma. TFCT transforms dynamics of the IHL FI from a progressive to constant with fluctuations within interval 3–3.6 points BBB, significantly improves spasticity during 1st–3rd week, further stabilizes the IHL SI at 1.8–2.1 points Ashworth. TFKT causes a progressive (1st month) and progressive-to-constant (6th–24th week) phase of IHL FI dynamics, significantly improves spasticity during the first two weeks. Correlation between the average (for the group) value of mean value of IHL FI and SI during observation period was absent in group “TFCT”, in group “control” was found weak positive correlation, in group “TFKT” – moderate positive correlation, in group “TOBT” – strong negative correlation. Correlation analysis of individual IHL FI and SI values during observation period and at each time of observation indicates the predominance of negative correlation between them.
Conclusions. Variability of the correlation between IHL FI and SI indicates significant differences in breadth of supraspinal projection coating of IHL motoneurons populations, their survival during experiment after different types of tissue neurotransplantation.
References
Louie, D.R., Eng, J.J., & Lam, T. SCIRE Research Team (2015). Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 12 (82), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0074-9.
López-Larraz, E., Trincado-Alonso, F., Rajasekaran, V., Pérez-Nombela, S., del-Ama, A.J., Aranda, J. ...Montesano, L. (2016). Control of an ambulatory exoskeleton with a brain–machine interface for spinal cord injury gait rehabilitation. Front. Neurosci., 10 (359), 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00359.
Miller, L.E., Zimmermann, A.K., & Herbert, W.G. (2016). Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta analysis. Med. Devices (Auckl)., 9, 455-466. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S103102.
Siebert, J.R, Eade, A.M., & Osterhout, D.J. (2015). Biomaterial approaches to enhancing neurorestoration after spinal cord injury: strategies for overcoming inherent biological obstacles. Bio. Med. Res. Int., 2015, 1-20. doi: 10.1155/2015/752572.
Tsintou, M., Dalamagkas, K., & Seifalian, A.M. (2015). Advances in regenerative therapies for spinal cord injury: a biomaterials approach. Neural Regen. Res., 10(5), 726-742. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.156966.
Volpato, F.Z., Führmann, T., Migliaresi, C., Hutmacher, D.W., & Dalton P.D. (2013). Using extracellular matrix for regenerative medicine in the spinal cord. Biomaterials, 34(21), 4945-4955. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.057.
Leach, J.B., Achyuta, A.K.H., & Murthy, S.K. (2010). Bridging the divide between neuroprosthetic design, tissue engineering and neurobiology. Front. Neuroeng., 2(18), 1-19. doi: 10.3389/neuro.16.018.2009.
Siebert, J.R., Eade, A.M., & Osterhout, D.J. (2015). Biomaterial approaches to enhancing neurorestoration after spinal cord injury: strategies for overcoming inherent biological obstacles. BioMed Res. Int., 2015, 1-20. doi: 10.1155/2015/752572.
Tsintou, M., Dalamagkas, K., & Seifalian, A.M. (2015). Advances in regenerative therapies for spinal cord injury: a biomaterials approach. Neural Regen. Res., 10(5), 726-742. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.156966.
Volpato, F.Z., Führmann, T., Migliaresi, C., Hutmacher, D.W., & Dalton, P.D. (2013) Using extracellular matrix for regenerative medicine in the spinal cord. Biomaterials, 34(21), 4945-4955. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.057.
Wu, J., Sun, T., Ye, C., Yao, J., Zhu, B., & He, H. (2012). Clinical observation of fetal olfactory ensheathing glia transplantation (OEGT) in patients with complete chronic spinal cord injury. Cell. Transplant., 21(1), 33-37. doi: 10.3727/096368912X633743.
van Gorp, S., Leerink, M., Kakinohana, O., Platoshyn, O., Santucci, C., Galik, J., ...Marsala, M. (2013). Amelioration of motor/sensory dysfunction and spasticity in a rat model of acute lumbar spinal cord injury by human neural stem cell transplantation. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 4(57), 1-22. doi: 10.1186/scrt209.
Nagayama, S., Homma, R., & Imamura, F. (2014). Neuronal organization of olfactory bulb circuits. Front. Neural Circuits, 8(98), 1-19. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00098.
Hoshino, M. (2012). Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebellum and dorsal hindbrain. Dev. Growth Differ., 54(3), 317-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01330.x.
Marzban, H., Del Bigio, M.R., Alizadeh, J., Ghavami, S., Zachariah, R.M., & Rastegar, M. (2015). Cellular commitment in the developing cerebellum. Front. Cell. Neurosci., 8(450), 1-26. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00450.
Chang, J.C., Leung, M., Gokozan, H.N., Gygli, P.E., Catacutan, F.P., Czeisler, C., & Otero, J.J. (2015). Mitotic events in cerebellar granule progenitor cells that expand cerebellar surface area are critical for normal cerebellar cortical lamination in mice. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 74(3), 261-272. doi:10.1097/NEN.0000000000000171.
Reidy, K.J., & Rosenblum, N.D. (2009). Cell and molecular biology of kidney development. Semin. Nephrol., 29(4), 321-337. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2009.03.009.
Woolf, A.S., Gnudi, L., & Long, D.A. (2009). Roles of angiopoietins in kidney development and disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 20(2), 239-244. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008020243.
Hu, Y., Gomez, A., & Sequeira-Lopez, M.L.S. (2015). Hemovascular progenitors in the kidney require sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 for vascular development. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 27(7), 1984-1995. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015060610.
Halt, K.J., Parssinen, H.E., Junttila, S.M., Saarela, U., Sims-Lucas, S., Koivunen P., ...Vainio S.J. (2016). CD146+ cells are essential for kidney vasculature development. Kidney Int., 90(2), 311-324. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.021.
Tsymbaliuk, V.I., Medvediev, V.V., Semenova, V.M., Grydina, N.Ya., Senchyk, Yu.Yu., Velychko, O.M. et al. (2016). Model peresichennia polovyny poperechnyka spynoho mozku. I. Tekhnichni, patomorfolohichni ta kliniko-experymentalni osoblyvosti [The model of spinal cord lateral hemisection. Part I. The technical, pathomorphological, clinical and experimental peculiarities]. Ukr. Neirokhirurh. Zhurnal – Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 2, 18–27 [in Ukrainian].
Dong, H.W., Wang, L.H., Zhang, M., & Han, J.S. (2005). Decreased dynorphin A (1–17) in the spinal cord of spastic rats after the compressive injury. Brain Res. Bull., 67(3), 189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.026.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)