PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES PROGRAM FOR POST LAPAROSCOPIC SCAPULOHUMERAL PAIN SYNDROME

Authors

  • S. I. SAVOLIUK
  • V. I. ZUBAL
  • R. O. BALATSKYI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2016.2.6412

Abstract

The study involved 186 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Women 114 (61.3 %) overnumbered men.
There was used СО2 (carboxyperitoneum) to create gas environment for conducting the operation in the abdominal cavity.
During preoperative and intraoperative periods the patients of the main group were used prophylactic measures program for
post laparoscopic scapulohumeral pain syndrome which included a patient’s position on the operating table at the beginning
and at the end of the surgical intervention, carboxyperitoneum method, insuffl ation rate and intra-abdominal pressure. The
patients of the control group under went standard surgical interventions without prophylactic measures program. The main
group included 96 (51.6 %) patients, the control group included 90 (48.4 %) patients. The average operating time was (55±10)
minutes. 22 (22.9 %) patients of the main group and 37 (41.1 %) patients of the control group suffered from post laparoscopic
scapulohumeral pain syndrome. The level of pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was measured as (3.5±0.3) (p<0.05)
points (on the 10-point scale) in the main group, satisfaction with treatment outcomes was (4.3±0.2) (p>0.05) points (on the
5-point scale). The average bed day was (2.0±0.5) days. In the control group, the level of pain the patients assessed as (5.5±0.3)
points by the VAS, satisfaction with treatment outcomes was (3.3±0.2) points (on the 5-point scale). The average patient day
in hospital was (3.0±0.5) days. The suggested program is safe, new and prospective prophylactic method for post laparoscopic
scapulohumeral pain syndrome. The use of such prophylactic measures program may improve laparoscopic interventions,
shorten the post-operative rehabilitation, and improve life quality.

References

Вартанова И. В. Управление нервно-мышечным бло-

ком: зачем это нужно и как это сделать? / И. В. Вартанова,

Е. П. Макаренко // Тольяттинский мед. консилиум. – 2012. –

№ 3/4. – С. 63–70.

Гальперин Э. И. Руководство по хирургии желчных пу-

тей / под ред. Э. И. Гальперина, П. С. Ветшева. – 2-е изд. –

М. : Видар-М, 2009. – 563 с.

Корик В. Е. Карбоксиперитонеум при лапароскопических

операциях – необходимость альтернативы? / В. Е. Корик //

Воен. медицина. – 2009. – № 4. – С. 73–75.

Кохно В. Н. Влияние упреждающей анельгезии на

послеоперационный болевой синдром в лапароскопической

хирургии / В. Н. Кохно, П. С. Шмерко, И. Ю. Шахтарин //

Анестезиология и реаниматология. – 2009. – № 6. – С. 68–70.

Лебедев Н. В. Оценка тяжести состояния больных в не-

отложной хирургии и травматологии / Н. В. Лебедев. – М. :

Медицина, 2008. – 142 с.

Осипова Н. А. Боль в хирургии. Средства и способы

защиты : руководство / Н. А. Осипова, В. В. Петрова. – М. :

Мед. информ. агентство (МИА), 2013. – 458 с.

Особенности анестезиологического пособия при лапа-

роскопических операциях / В. А. Поповкин, М. А. Филатов,

М. Ю. Гречищев [и др.] // Тольяттинский мед. консилиум. –

– № 3/4. – С. 149–153.

Послеоперационный болевой синдром: его составляю-

щие и механизмы формирования при плановых оперативных

вмешательствах / Н. П. Шень, В. В. Логвиненко, П. Б. Ва-

силенко [и др.] // Мед. наука и образование Урала. – 2011. –

№ 3. – С. 77–79.

Япаров Р. М. Лечение постлапароскопического болевого

синдрома / Р. М. Япаров, А. Е. Албакова, О. Ю. Рыбачек //

Вестник КазНМУ. – 2013. – № 3. – С. 1–3.

Яхно Н. Н. Боль : практ. руководство для врачей / под ред.

Н. Н. Яхно, М. Л. Кукушкина ; Российская акад. мед. наук. –

М. : Изд-во РАМН, 2011. – 511 с.

Alexander J. I. Pain after laparoscopy / J. L. Alexander //

Br. J. Anaesth. – 1997. – Vol. 79, Nо. 3. – P. 369–378.

Almagor M. Preoperative and postoperative levels of

interleukin-6 in patients with acute appendicitis: comparison

between open and laparoscopic appendectomy / M. Almagor,

A. Mintz, O. Sibirsky, A. Durst // Surg. Endosc. – 2005. – Vol. 19,

Nо. 3. – P. 331–333.

Effects of low and high intra-abdominal pressure on immune

response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy / E. Basgul, B. Bahadir,

V. Celiker [et al.] // Saudi Med. J. – 2004. – Vol. 25, Nо. 12. –

P. 1888–1891.

Bourke J. What is pain? a history the prothero lecture /

J. Bourke // Trans. R. Hist. Soc. – 2013. – Vol. 23. – P. 155–173.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and postoperative pain: is

it affected by intra-abdominal pressure? / A. S. Celik, N. Frat,

F. Celebi [et al.] // Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. –

– Vol. 20, Nо. 4. – P. 220–222.

Transversus abdominis plane block to ameliorate postoperative

pain outcomes after laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of

randomized controlled trials / G. S. De Oliveira, L. J. Castro-

Alves, A. Nader [et al.] // Anesth. Analg. – 2014. – Vol. 118,

Nо. 2. – P. 454–463.

Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic

arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood fl ow /

L. N. Diebel, R. F. Wilson, S. A. Dulchavsky, J. Saxe // J. Trauma.

– 1992. – Vol. 33, Nо. 2. – P. 279–282.

Francis L. Postoperative pain: nurses' knowledge and patients'

experiences / L. Francis, J. J. Fitzpatrick // Pain Manag. Nurs. –

– Vol. 14, Nо. 4. – P. 351–357.

Garimella V. Postoperative pain control / V. Garimella,

C. Cellini // Clin. Colon. Rectal. Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 26, Nо. 3.

– P. 191–196.

Grabowski J. E. Physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum /

J. E. Grabowski, M. A. Talamini // J. Gastrointest. Surg. – 2009.

– Vol. 13, Nо. 5. – P. 1009–1016.

Ibraheim O. A. Lactate and acid base changes during

laparoscopic cholecystectomy / O. A. Ibraheim, A. H. Samarkandi,

H. Alshehry [et al.] // Middle East J. Anesthesiol. – 2006. –

Vol. 18, Nо. 4. – P. 757–768.

Joris J. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:

characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine / J. Joris,

E. Thiry, P. Paris [et al.] // Anesth. Analg. – 1995. – Vol. 81,

Nо. 2. – P. 379–384.

Joshipura V. P. A prospective randomized, controlled study

comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum

during laparoscopic cholecystectomy / V. P. Joshipura,

S. P. Haribhakti, N. R. Patel [et al.] // Surg. Laparosc. Endosc.

Percutan. Tech. – 2009. – Vol. 19, Nо. 3. – P. 234–240.

Kalso E. IV. Persistent post-surgery pain: research agenda for

mechanisms, prevention, and treatment / E. Kalso // Br. J. Anaesth.

– 2013. – Vol. 111, Nо. 1. – P. 9–12.

Kanwer D. B. Comparative study of low pressure

versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic

cholecystectomy – a randomised controlled trial / D. B. Kanwer,

L. Kaman, M. Nedounsejiane [et al.] // Trop. Gastroenterol. –

– Vol. 30, Nо. 3. – P. 171–174.

Kieber J. J. Cytokinins / J. J. Kieber, G. E. Schaller //

Arabidopsis Book. – 2014. – Vol. 12. – P. e0168.

Randomized, prospective comparison of postoperative pain in

low- versus high-pressure pneumoperitoneum / M. Koc, T. Ertan,

M. Tez [et al.] // ANZ J. Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 75, Nо. 8. – P. 693–

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum

is safe even for high-risk patients / A. M. Koivusalo,

P. Pere, M. Valjus, T. Scheinin // Surg. Endosc. – 2008. – Vol. 22,

Nо. 1. – P. 61–67.

Pathophysiologic effects of CO2-pneumoperitoneum in

laparoscopic surgery / V. Nesek-Adam, V. Mrsić, A. Smiljanić

[et al.] // Acta. Med. Croatica. – 2007. – Vol. 61, Nо. 2. – P. 165–

DRGs in Europe: a cross country analysis for cholecystectomy /

G. Paat-Ahi, M. Swiderek, P. Sakowski [et al.] // Health Econ. –

– Vol. 21, Suppl. 2. – P. 66–76.

A simple clinical maneuver to reduce laparoscopy-induced

shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial / P. Phelps, O. S. Cakmakkaya, C. C. Apfel, O. C. Radke // Obstet. Gynecol.

– 2008. – Vol. 111, Nо. 5. – P. 1155–1160.

Postlaparoscopic pain syndrome. Results of a prospective,

randomized study / A. Pier, M. Benedic, B. Mann, V. Buck //

Chirurg. – 1994. – Vol. 65, Nо. 3. – P. 200–208.

Effectiveness and safety of postoperative pain management:

a survey of 18 925 consecutive patients between 1998 and

(2nd revision): a database analysis of prospectively raised

data / D. M. Pöpping, P. K. Zahn, H. K. Van Aken [et al.] //

Br. J. Anaesth. – 2008. – Vol. 101, Nо. 6. – P. 832–840.

Postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective

laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low versus standard-pressure

pneumoperitoneum. A randomized clinical trial / C. H. Sandoval-

Jiménez, G. J. Méndez-Sashida, L. M. Cruz-Márquez-Rico [et al.] //

Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. – 2009. – Vol. 74, Nо. 4. – P. 314–320.

A comparison of three techniques for acute postoperative pain

control following major abdominal surgery / A. Shapiro, E. Zohar,

D. Hoppenstein [et al.] // J. Clin. Anesth. – 2003. – Vol. 15, Nо. 5.

– P. 345–350.

Pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a

randomized prospective trial of low pressure and standard pressure

pneumoperitoneum / S. Singla, G. Mittal, J. Raghav, R. K. Mittal //

J. Clin. Diagn. Res. – 2014. – Vol. 8, Nо. 2. – P. 92–94.

Taverner T. Nurse screening for neuropathic pain in

postoperative patients / T. Taverner, J. Prince // Br. J. Nurs. –

– Vol. 23, Nо. 2. – P. 76–80.

Prevention of postlaparoscopic shoulder and upper abdominal

pain: a randomized controlled trial / H. W. Tsai, P. H. Wang,

M. S. Yen [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. – 2013. – Vol. 121, Nо. 3.

– P. 526–531.

Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and

localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative

symptoms and intraoperative events / B. M. Ure, H. Troidl,

W. Spangenberger [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. – 1994. – Vol. 8, Nо. 2.

– P. 90–96.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report from a single center /

K. Vagenas, S. N. Karamanakos, C. Spyropoulos [et al.] // World

J. Gastroenterol. – 2006. – Vol. 12, Nо. 24. – P. 3887–3890.

Vázquez-Sequeiros E. Carbon dioxide insuffl ation in

endoscopy – Luxury or need? / E. Vázquez-Sequeiros // Rev. Esp.

Enferm. Dig. – 2012. – Vol. 104, Nо. 8. – P. 395–398.

Ward C. W. Procedure-specifi c postoperative pain

management / C. W. Ward // Medsurg. Nurs. – 2014. – Vol. 23,

Nо. 2. – P. 107–110.

Wills V. L. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect

of heated carbon dioxide for insuffl ation on pain and recovery

after laparoscopic fundoplication / V. L. Wills, D. R. Hunt,

A. Armstrong // Surg. Endosc. – 2001. – Vol. 15, Nо. 2. – P. 166–

Shoulder pain after abdominal laparoscopic operation: a

multicenter study / F. F. Xu, L. B. Xiao, J. D. Zuo [et al.] // Chin.

Med. J. – 2013. – Vol. 126, Nо. 2. – P. 382–384.

Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure

versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic

cholecystectomy / M. Yasir, K. S. Mehta, V. H. Banday [et al.] //

Surgeon. – 2012. – Vol. 10, Nо. 2. – P. 71–74.

Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques on

postoperative pain: a prospective randomized study / H. Yilmaz,

O. Arun, S. Apiliogullari [et al.] // J. Korean. Surg. Soc. – 2013. –

Vol. 85, Nо. 4. – P. 149–153.

Published

2016-05-21

How to Cite

SAVOLIUK, S. I., ZUBAL, V. I., & BALATSKYI, R. O. (2016). PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES PROGRAM FOR POST LAPAROSCOPIC SCAPULOHUMERAL PAIN SYNDROME. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (2). https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2016.2.6412

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK