RECONSTRUCTION AFTER FOURNIER’S GANGRENE IN MEN

Authors

  • I. V. STOIANOVSKYI ДНП «Львівський національний медичний університет імені Данила Галицького», Львів, Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-1016
  • N. V. TUZIUK Lviv Regional Hospital for War Veterans and Repressed Persons named after Yuriy Lypa, Lviv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-7511
  • V. S. SAVCHYN Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine Lviv Regional Hospital for War Veterans and Repressed Persons named after Yuriy Lypa, Lviv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-1628

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2026.1.16078

Keywords:

necrotizing soft tissue infection, penis, scrotum, perineal defect, skin graft, fasciocutaneous flap

Abstract

The aim of the work: to analyze the reconstructive stage of treatment of Fournier’s gangrene in men, compare our clinical data with recent literature, and demonstrate the possibilities of early staged genital reconstruction using local tissues.

Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis included 150 patients with surgically confirmed necrotizing fasciitis treated in 1999–2024. Of them, 21 had involvement of the external genitalia, perineum and/or perianal region. A narrative review of publications from 2019 to 2026 on reconstruction after Fournier’s gangrene was also performed.

Results. Fournier’s gangrene was diagnosed in 21 (14.0%) of 150 patients; men accounted for 16 (76.2%) cases. Mortality in this subgroup was 28.6%. In 12 men in whom the infectious process was successfully controlled, the area of skin loss ranged from 80 to 375 cm²; complete loss of penile and scrotal skin was observed in 5 patients and partial loss in 7. Split-thickness skin grafting provided rapid closure of granulating wounds, but was associated with scarring, soft-tissue retraction, and penile deformity. In 5 patients, staged reconstruction was performed with a local skin-subcutaneous tube pedicle flap harvested from the medial thigh. Follow-up at 6–12 months showed satisfactory elastic coverage and restoration of urinary and erectile function. Split-thickness skin grafting remains the basic method for closing flat well-granulating defects, but in the genital-perineal region it often fails to provide the best functional and aesthetic result. The presented case confirms the feasibility of early staged reconstruction immediately after infection control.

Conclusions. Reconstructive strategy after Fournier’s gangrene should be individualized: skin grafting is useful for rapid wound healing, whereas a local tube-pedicle flap allows more complete soft-tissue restoration in a functionally important area.

Received: 05.01.2026 | Revised: 02.02.2026 | Accepted: 23.02.2026

References

Sorensen MD, Krieger JN. Fournier’s Gangrene: Epidemiology and Outcomes in the General US Population. Urol Int. 2016; 97(3):249-59. DOI: 10.1159/000445695.

Insua-Pereira I, Costa Ferreira P, Teixeira S, Barreiro D, Silva A. Fournier’s gangrene: a review of reconstructive options. Cent European J Urol. 2020; 73(1):74-9. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0060.

Michael P, Peiris B, Ralph D, Johnson M, Lee WG. Genital reconstruction following Fournier’s gangrene. Sex Med Rev. 2022; 10(4):800-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.05.002.

Huayllani MT, Cheema AS, McGuire MJ, Janis JE. Practical review of the current management of Fournier’s gangrene. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(3):e4191. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004191.

Louro JM, Albano M, Baltazar J, Vaz M, Diogo C, Ramos S, Cabral L. Fournier’s gangrene: 10-year experience of a Plastic Surgery and Burns Department at a tertiary hospital. Acta Med Port. 2019; 32(5):368-74. DOI: 10.20344/amp.11003.

Biju NE, Sadiq M, Raj S, Patel A, Shah R, Weale RD, Thomas K, Rose V. Fournier’s gangrene reconstruction: a 10-year retrospective analysis of practice at Guys and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023; 80:13-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.02.030.

Susini P, Marcaccini G, Efica J, Giuffrè MT, Mazzotta R, Caneschi C, Cuomo R, Nisi G, Grimaldi L. Fournier’s gangrene surgical reconstruction: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14):4085. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144085.

Guliyeva G, Huayllani MT, Sharma NT, Janis JE. Practical review of necrotizing fasciitis: principles and evidence-based management. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(1):e5533. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005533.

Kopechek KJ, Patel HV, Koch GE. Modern management of Fournier’s gangrene. Curr Urol Rep. 2025; 26(1):47. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-025-01275-3.

Stoianovskyi IV, Khimich SD. [Application of a controlled fecal diversion system for prevention of wound contamination in necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum and perianal region]. Visnyk Vinnytskoho Natsionalnoho Medychnoho Universytetu. 2025; 29(2):265-68. DOI: 10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2025-29(2)-15.

Alammar A, Laing K, Somasundaram J, Wallace DL, Rogers AD. Flap reconstruction following Fournier’s gangrene: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Burns. 2026; 52(3):107888. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2026.107888.

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

STOIANOVSKYI, I. V., TUZIUK, N. V., & SAVCHYN, V. S. (2026). RECONSTRUCTION AFTER FOURNIER’S GANGRENE IN MEN. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2026.1.16078

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK