RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS AFTER TAPP-PLASTY OF INGUINAL HERNIAS IN ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2025.3.15622Keywords:
inguinal hernia, TAPP-plasty, elderly and senile patients, mesh implantationAbstract
The aim of the work: to assess the course and frequency of complications during and after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal plasty of inguinal hernias in elderly and senile patients.
Materials and Methods. A retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data was conducted on the basis of the Volochysk Multi-Profile Hospital and the Lutsk City Clinical Hospital, which included 56 male patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia (K40 according to ICD-10). The average age of the patients was (69.8±5.8) years, which corresponded to the age categories of elderly and senile age. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the method of mesh implantation: group A (with mesh fixation, n=28) and group B (without fixation, n=28). All patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal plasty (TAPP). Pneumoperitoneum was created up to 12 mm Hg. 3 trocars were used: one 10-mm (umbilical) and two 5-mm (right and left iliac). All patients were operated on under inhalation anesthesia with artificial ventilation. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) after 2–6 h, the next day, on the day of discharge, after 1 week and 1 month. Chronic pain and paresthesias were assessed using the CPSP (Chronic Post-Surgical Pain) scale in the long term. All patients signed an informed consent to participate in the study and to process personal data for scientific purposes.
Results. The average duration of operations in patients from group A (with mesh fixation) was (64.3±12.5) min, while in group B (without fixation) – (51.4±10.8) min, which is approximately 20 % less than in group A, and is consistent with the data of world researchers, who indicate a reduction in operating time with a fixation-free technique due to the lack of need for additional manipulations with mesh fixation. There were no intraoperative complications during laparoscopic interventions. The total frequency of early and late postoperative complications was recorded in 9 patients: in group A (with mesh fixation) – in 7, in group B (without mesh fixation) – in 2. Pulmonary artery thromboembolism and postoperative pneumonia were not observed in any case. After complete desufflation and control of the correct location of the mesh, the procedure was completed. The ports were sutured with appropriate sutures.
Conclusions. The results of the study showed that TAPP-plasty of inguinal hernias in elderly and senile patients is effective in both fixation and non-fixation methods of mesh implantation. The use of the non-fixation method allowed to significantly reduce the level of postoperative pain and contributed to a faster restoration of functional activity without recurrence.
References
Amirzargar MA, Mohseni M, Poorolajal J. Mesh fixation compared with nonfixation in transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Technol Int. 2013; 23:122-25.
Awad SS, Qahtani FH, Alsulaimani FS, et al. Perioperative outcome and cost utility of mesh fixation vs non fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Lap Surg. 2023; 16(3):169-72.
Garg P, Nair S, Shereef M, Thakur JD, Nain N, Menon GR, Ismail M. Mesh fixation compared to non-fixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct.; 25(10):3300-06.
Kaul A, Hutfless S, Le H, Hamed SA, Tymitz K, Nguyen H, Marohn MR. Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 May; 26(5):1269-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2025-2
Kobayashi F, Watanabe J, Koizumi M, Sata N. Efficacy and safety of mesh non fixation in patients undergoing laparo endoscopic repair of groin hernia: a systematic review and meta analysis. Hernia. 2023; 27(6):1415-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02919-4
Kochar S, Kakkar D, Singh DP. Evaluation of mesh fixation versus non fixation in laparoscopic mesh hernioplasty in inguinal hernias. Int Surg J. 2020; 7(10):3354-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20204136
Naveenraj R, Patel B, Kavathiya J, Samdani S. Comparative study of mesh fixation versus without mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by TAPP approach. Int Surg J. 2024; 11(5):744-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241136
Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR. Randomized Prospective Study of Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: Fixation Versus No Fixation of Mesh. JSLS. 2006 Oct.-Dec.; 10(4):457-60.
Buyukasik K, Ari A, Akce B , Tatar C, O Segmen O, Bektas H. Comparison of mesh fixation and non fixation in totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. Hernia. 2017 Aug.; 21(4):543-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1590-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1590-2
Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, Yang KH, Zhang YC, Tian JH, Han JX. A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus non fixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep.; 25(9):2849-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1668-3
Wei K, Lu C, Ge L, Pan B, Yang H, Tian J, Cao N. Different types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr.; 97(16):e0423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010423
Garg P, Nair S, Shereef M, Thakur JD, Nain N, Menon GR, et al. Mesh fixation compared to non-fixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct.; 25(10):3300-06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1708-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 І. Ю. ЛАВРЕНЮК, А. М. ПРОДАН, Ю. В. ЛАВРЕНЮК

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).