REGRESSION MODEL OF THE PROBABILITY OF RECURRENCE OF ACUTE ULCERS OF GASTRODUODENAL BLEEDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2024.1.14645Keywords:
bleeding, gastroduodenal ulcers, recurrence, regressionAbstract
The aim of the work: to develop a regression model of the probability of recurrence of acute gastroduodenal bleeding taking into account clinical and laboratory and local (morphological) criteria.
Materials and Methods. 378 patients were examined to predict the recurrence of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, the average age of the examined was (45.34±1.32) years. The gender component was 121 women and 257 men. Multivariate regression analysis in the Statistica 12.0 program was used to build a prognostic model of recurrence of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. The Nigelkirk test (R2) was used to check the quality of the prognostic model, and the ANOVA analysis was used to assess the acceptability of the model.
Results and Discussion. A regression model of the development of recurrence of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding was obtained, which includes such factors as gender; age; term of hospitalization; blood type; hemoglobin on admission; primary or recurrent (bleeding); ulcer localization; ulcer size; class for Forrest; accompanying pathology; drug therapy, type of endoscopic hemostasis, biopsy of the edge of the ulcer.
It was established that 86.70 % of the listed factors play a significant role in the model for predicting the risk of recurrence of the gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. The coefficient of determination indicates that the obtained observations confirm the effectiveness of the mathematical model. The use of the proposed mathematical model, which takes into account the identified risk factors for the development of recurrence of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, provides the possibility of early prediction of potential complications and the probability of recurrence of the disease. This, in turn, contributes to early diagnosis and selection of more effective and less harmful methods of treatment of gastroduodenal bleeding.
References
Chandra S, Hess EP, Agarwal D, Nestler DM, Montori VM, Song LM, Wells GA, Stiell IG. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(5):673-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2011.03.010
Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36(8):782-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12029
Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Kumar NL, Brozovic S, Claggett BL, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(4):551-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.022
Kim MS, Moon HS, Kwon IS, Park JH, Kim JS, Kang SH, Sung JK, Lee ES, Kim SH, Lee BS, Jeong HY. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01346-4
Laursen SB, Stanley AJ, Laine L, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Rebleeding in peptic ulcer bleeding – a nationwide cohort study of 19,537 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022;57(12):1423-1429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2098050
Mille M, Engelhardt T, Stier A. Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer: Strategies in High-Risk Ulcers. Visc Med. 2021;37(1):52-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000513689
Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Cahill A, Gaya DR, Thompson E, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Benson G, Murray W. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(4):470-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04747.x
Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(1):22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12554
Yamaguchi D, Nagatsuma G, Sakata Y, Mizuta Y, Nomura T, Jinnouchi A, Gondo K, Asahi R, Ishida S, Kimura S, Fujimoto S, Shimakura A, Jubashi A, Takeuchi Y, Ikeda K, Tanaka Y, Yoshioka W, Hino N, Morisaki T, Ario K, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Safety and Efficacy of Sedation During Emergency Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68(4):1426-1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07740-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 YA. V. KACHANOVSKYI, A. S. SVERSTYUK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
