Features of postoperative rehabilitation of patients with urolithsasis

Authors

  • V. V. Tverdokhlib I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • A. I. Mysak I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • S. O. Nesteruk I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • T. T. Stakhiv I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.2.10782

Keywords:

percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, urolithiasis, rehabilitation

Abstract

The aim of the work: to analyze the effectiveness of sanatorium-resort rehabilitation in patients after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

An analysis was made of the treatment of 65 patients after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the Urological Rehabilitation Department at Husiatyn District Hospital. The obtained results were compared with a control group (35 patients) who had not undergone sanatorium-resort treatment. In 64.4 % of patients the fragments went out completely, in 25.6 % – partially departed. The residual fragments did not go away completely, or there was a partial withdrawal in late terms (after 1–2 months) – in 10 % of patients. The data obtained showed the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation in patients after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy compared with the control group that did not undergo rehabilitation at the resort of Husiatyn.

References

Hubar, A.O., Vozianov., S.O., & Dovbysh, M.A. (2010). Eksperymentalna renthenkompiuterna densytometriia sechovykh konkrementiv [Experimental radiographic densitometry of urinary calculi]. Materialy zizdu asotsiatsii urolohiv Ukrainy – Materials of Congress of Association of Urologists of Ukraine. September, 16-18. (pp. 252-256) [in Ukrainian].

Dzeranov, N.K., Mudraya, I.S., & Kirpatovskiy, V.I. (2001). Vliyaniye narusheniy urodinamiky i sokratitelnoy funktsii verkhnikh mochevyvodyashchikh putey na otkhozhdeniye fragmentov kamney posle distantsionnoy litotripsii [The influence of urodynamics and contractile function of the upper urinary tract on the discharge of stone fragments after distance lithotripsy]. Urologiya – Urology, 2, 6-9 [in Russian].

Lopatkin, N.A., & Dzeranov, N.K. (2003). Pyatnitsaletniy opyt primeneniya DLT v lechenii MKB [Fifteen years of experience with DLT in the treatment of KSD]. Materialy Plenuma pravleniya Rossiyskogo obshchestva urologov – Materials of the Plenum of the Board of the Russian Society of Urology, 5-25 [in Russian].

Lopatkin, N.A., Trapeznikova, M.F., Dutov, V.V., & Dze­ranov, N.K. (2007). Distantsionnaya udarno-volnovaya litotripsiya: proshloye, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Remote shock wave lithotripsy: Past, present, future]. Urologiya – Urology, 6, 3-13 [in Russian].

Pasechnikov, S.P., & Mitchenko, M.V. (2007). Sovremennye aspekty tsitratnoy terapii pri mochekamyanoy bolezni. Opyt primeneniya preparata Uralit-U [Current aspects of citrate therapy for urolithiasis. The experience of using the drug Uralit-U]. Zdorovye muzhchiny – Health of a Man, 3, 109-113 [in Russian].

Chang, C.-P., Huang, S.-H., & Tai, H.-L. (2001). Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy. Journal of Endourology, 15 (6), 563-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/089277901750426292

Deliveliotis, C.H., Varkarakis, J., Alagrof, E., & Skolarikos, A. Extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with distal ureteral calculi does not influence the prostate spesific antigen value. Journal of Andrology, 15 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/089277901317203038

Milad, H., Mark, L., & Uwechue, E. (2002). Ureteric stents increase the number of shock wave adsession of ESWL to clear of ureeric stones. European Urology (1), 1, 38.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-21

How to Cite

Tverdokhlib, V. V., Mysak, A. I., Nesteruk, S. O., & Stakhiv, T. T. (2020). Features of postoperative rehabilitation of patients with urolithsasis. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (2), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.2.10782

Issue

No. 2 (2020)

Section

REPORTS

License

Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.  
  2. Лицензия Creative Commons
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)