COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF EPILEPSY IN UKRAINE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2312-0967.2019.4.10700Keywords:
epilepsy, drug, British National Formulary, National Medicines Formulary, Unified Clinical ProtocolAbstract
The aim of the work. To carry out a comparative analysis of the range of medicines used for the treatment of epilepsy in accordance with the provisions of regulatory documents in Ukraine and the United Kingdom.
Materials and Methods. The study used official data on the regulatory regulation of epilepsy pharmacotherapy, in particular, the recommendation of the British National Form (updated April 2018), the State Medicines Form (Issue 11, Ministry of Health, Order No. 892 of 18.04.2019), Unified Clinical protocol of primary, emergency, secondary (specialized) and tertiary (highly specialized) medical care for epilepsy in adults ”(Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine of April 27, 2014 No. 276). The following methods were used: logical, system-analytical, comparative analysis and generalization of information.
Results and Discussion. According to the results of the analysis of the data of the British National Form, it is determined that 19 anti-epileptic drugs under the international non-proprietary name are recommended for the treatment of epilepsy patients. When comparing antieptic drugs with drugs that are included in the domestic regulatory provisions governing the provision of quality medical and pharmaceutical care to patients, a number of differences were identified. These differences include both the absence of certain medicines under the international non-proprietary name and different approaches to the formation of patients' pharmacotherapy lines. According to the results of a comparative analysis of the composition of the range of recommended anti-epileptic drugs, the British National Form with the State Form of Medicines found that only nine drugs of international non-proprietary name were included in the national composition. Studies of anti-epileptic drugs, according to the State Medicines Form, give grounds for claiming the dominance of foreign-made drugs (68 % of the total number of anti-epileptic drugs presented). Manufacturers of anti-epileptic drugs have been analyzed, leaders in foreign and domestic companies have been established.
Conclusions. A number of differences have been identified between the recommendations of the British National Form and the National Medicines Form and the standardized clinical protocol for the treatment of epilepsy patients. Thus, there are only 9 antiepileptic drugs in the National Medicines Form, out of the 19 medicines listed in the British National Form. The national protocol of treatment includes 12 drugs under the international non-proprietary name. Analysis of the data of the State form of medicines for anti-epileptic drugs, showed that the total number of medicines represented was 315 trade names, taking into account the forms of issue, the main share of this range was formed by drugs of foreign companies, the ratio was 68 % to 32 %.
References
Epilepsy 2019. World Health Organization [Internet] [updated
June 20; cited 2019 Nov 5]. WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy
Tokareva NG, Zheleznova EV [Clinical assessment of epilepsy patients’ spelling] Health and Education millennium. 2016;18: 31-3.
Grinkiv YaA. [Specialization of pharmaceutical assistance for the rational use of anti-epileptic drugs]. Lviv, 2011.
Grinkiv YA, Zeleniuk OK, Zavada LO, Mandyuk OO, Parnovsky BL. [Integration of medical and pharmaceutical care for epilepsy patients] Upravlinnya, ekonomika ta zabezpechennia yakosti v farmatsii. 2011;5: 44-7. Ukrainian.
Grinkiv YaO. [Marketing analysis of the market for anti-epileptic drugs in Ukraine]. In: Psurceva IO, editors. Medicines - Human. Modern problems of pharmacotherapy and prescription of medicines. Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kharkiv: NUPh; 2017. Ukrainian.
Epilepsies: diagnosis and management 2019. British National Formulary. BNF Publications [Internet] British National Formulary [updated 2019 October; cited 2019 Nov]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg137/chapter/appendix-e-pharmacological-treatment
Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine No. 892 of 18.04. 2019. State form of medicines [Electronic resource]. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/uploads/2/11838-dn_20190418_892_dod_1.pdf Ukrainian.
Unified clinical protocol of primary, emergency, secondary (specialized) and tertiary (highly specialized) medical care for epilepsy in adults: order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine dated April 17, 2014 No. 276 [Electronic resource]. Available from: http://mtd.dec.gov.ua/images/additional/2014_276_Epilepsii/2014_276_YKPMD_epilepsiya_dorosli.pdf
On Amendments to the National List of Essential Medicines: CMU Resolution of 13.12. 2017 No.1081 [Electronic resource]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1081-2017-%D0%BF#n8
Psychoneurology and neuropsychiatry. New generation anti-epileptic drugs in the treatment of focal epilepsy [Electronic resource]. Available from:https://neuronews.com.ua/ru/issue-article-791/Protivoepilepticheskie-preparaty-novogo-pokoleniya-v-lechenii-fokalnoy-epilepsii#gsc.tab=0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish their materials in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and assign to the journal the right to first publish this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of original work and the first publication of work in this journal .
- Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form they are published by this journal (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
Journal policy allows and encourages publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial review, as it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).