THE EFFECT OF ANTISEPTICS ON THE MICROFLORA OF PERIOPERATIVE INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2025.2.15378Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia, postoperative infection, microorganisms, antisepticsAbstract
The aim of the work: to study the effectiveness of antiseptic agents in the prevention and treatment of perioperative infectious complications in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Materials and Methods. In order to determine the effectiveness of antiseptics on the microflora of perioperative infectious complications, 90 patients were selected for the study. The species composition of the microflora of the obtained biological material in the perioperative period was studied. Microflora was isolated from the surface of the postoperative wound, from drainages and the surface of the urethral catheter. Using generally accepted microbiological methods, the sensitivity of the leading pathogens of the purulent-inflammatory process to antiseptics was studied. Quantitative indicators were processed statistically.
Results. The conditionally pathogenic microflora of the perioperative area and bacteriological analysis of urine culture in the perioperative period in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were characterized by heterogeneity, where the main share belonged to the representatives of gram-negative microflora (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and enterobacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae ss. Pneumoniae), while among gram-positive microflora, staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermitis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus) were observed. In a comparative analysis, patients who underwent transvesical prostatectomy had higher rates of microbial contamination compared to groups 2 and 3, who underwent vesical prostatectomy (p<0.05). This is explained by the possibility of infected urine entering the prostatic and vesical spaces through suprapubic bladder drains, which are installed before surgery.
Сonclusions. Laparoscopic retropubic prostatectomy allows for better treatment results and fewer postoperative complications than open retropubic prostatectomy. Preparations based on cationic surfactants have powerful bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties against staphylococci, gram-negative non-fermenting microorganisms, and enterobacteria. Further studies are needed to be able to recommend laparoscopic retrograde prostatectomy in the practice of urological clinics in Ukraine that have laparoscopic equipment.
References
Haile ES, Sotimehin AE, Gill BC. Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cleve Clin J Med. 2024 Mar 1; 91(3):163-70. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.91a.23027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.91a.23027
Moraru-Burlesku RP, Gorovyi VI, Shaprynskyi VO, Kapshuk OM, Dovhan II, Taheiev VR. Laparoskopichna prostatektomiia v khirurhichnomu likuvanni dobroiakisnoi hiperplazii peredmikhurovoi zalozy [Laparoscopic prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Zdorov’ia cholovika. 2023; 2(85):45-50. DOI: 10.30841/2786- 7323.2.2023.286437. Ukrainian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30841/2786-7323.2.2023.286437
Cho JM, Moon KT, Lee JH, Choi JD, Kang JY, Yoo TK. Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy. Prostate Int. 2021; 9(2):101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.004
Suceken FY. Comparison of open and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy outcomes: experience of a single surgeon. Grand J. Urol. 2022; 2:93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/GJU.2022.52724
Mohamed AH, Mohamud HA. Open prostatectomy: the safety and efficacy of this procedure in developing countries. Journal of Urology. 2020; 8:53-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur. 2020.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/unoaj.2020.08.00275
Abreu D, Campos E, Seija V, Arroyo C, Suarez R, Rotemberg P, Guillama F, Carvalhal G, Campolo H, Machado M, Decia R. Surgical site infection in surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of two skin antiseptics and risk factors. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024; 15(6):763-767. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.174
Babalska ZŁ, Korbecka-Paczkowska M, Karpiński TM. Wound Antiseptics and European Guidelines for Antiseptic Application in Wound Treatment. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(12):1253-257. DOI: 10.3390/ph14121253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14121253
Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(1):86-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo. 2014.11.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.022
Melhem M, Burki J, Algurabi O, Gilani S, Ghumman F, Sheriff M, Wani M, Haddad R, Madaan S. The safety and feasibility of simultaneous robotic repair of an inguinal hernia during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol. 2022; 56(3):197-205. DOI: 10.1080/21681805. 2022.2065358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2065358
Stakhovskyi EO, Bilyk VI. Profilaktyka infektsiinykh uskladnen pislia transuretralnoi rezektsii z pryvodu hiperplazii peredmikhurovoi zalozy [Prevention of infectious complications after transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Likarska sprava. 2002; 1:66-68. Ukrainian.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 В. О. ШАПРИНСЬКИЙ, О. А. НАЗАРЧУК, В. І. ГОРОВИЙ, І. І. ДОВГАНЬ, Ю. М. БАБІНА, М. А. ВЕРБА

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).