THE EFFECT OF ANTISEPTICS ON THE MICROFLORA OF PERIOPERATIVE INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2025.2.15378

Keywords:

benign prostatic hyperplasia, postoperative infection, microorganisms, antiseptics

Abstract

The aim of the work: to study the effectiveness of antiseptic agents in the prevention and treatment of perioperative infectious complications in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Materials and Methods. In order to determine the effectiveness of antiseptics on the microflora of perioperative infectious complications, 90 patients were selected for the study. The species composition of the microflora of the obtained biological material in the perioperative period was studied. Microflora was isolated from the surface of the postoperative wound, from drainages and the surface of the urethral catheter. Using generally accepted microbiological methods, the sensitivity of the leading pathogens of the purulent-inflammatory process to antiseptics was studied. Quantitative indicators were processed statistically.

Results. The conditionally pathogenic microflora of the perioperative area and bacteriological analysis of urine culture in the perioperative period in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were characterized by heterogeneity, where the main share belonged to the representatives of gram-negative microflora (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and enterobacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae ss. Pneumoniae), while among gram-positive microflora, staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermitis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus) were observed. In a comparative analysis, patients who underwent transvesical prostatectomy had higher rates of microbial contamination compared to groups 2 and 3, who underwent vesical prostatectomy (p<0.05). This is explained by the possibility of infected urine entering the prostatic and vesical spaces through suprapubic bladder drains, which are installed before surgery.

Сonclusions. Laparoscopic retropubic prostatectomy allows for better treatment results and fewer postoperative complications than open retropubic prostatectomy. Preparations based on cationic surfactants have powerful bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties against staphylococci, gram-negative non-fermenting microorganisms, and enterobacteria. Further studies are needed to be able to recommend laparoscopic retrograde prostatectomy in the practice of urological clinics in Ukraine that have laparoscopic equipment.

References

Haile ES, Sotimehin AE, Gill BC. Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cleve Clin J Med. 2024 Mar 1; 91(3):163-70. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.91a.23027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.91a.23027

Moraru-Burlesku RP, Gorovyi VI, Shaprynskyi VO, Kapshuk OM, Dovhan II, Taheiev VR. Laparoskopichna prostatektomiia v khirurhichnomu likuvanni dobroiakisnoi hiperplazii peredmikhurovoi zalozy [Laparoscopic prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Zdorov’ia cholovika. 2023; 2(85):45-50. DOI: 10.30841/2786- 7323.2.2023.286437. Ukrainian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30841/2786-7323.2.2023.286437

Cho JM, Moon KT, Lee JH, Choi JD, Kang JY, Yoo TK. Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy. Prostate Int. 2021; 9(2):101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.004

Suceken FY. Comparison of open and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy outcomes: experience of a single surgeon. Grand J. Urol. 2022; 2:93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/GJU.2022.52724

Mohamed AH, Mohamud HA. Open prostatectomy: the safety and efficacy of this procedure in developing countries. Journal of Urology. 2020; 8:53-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur. 2020.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/unoaj.2020.08.00275

Abreu D, Campos E, Seija V, Arroyo C, Suarez R, Rotemberg P, Guillama F, Carvalhal G, Campolo H, Machado M, Decia R. Surgical site infection in surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of two skin antiseptics and risk factors. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024; 15(6):763-767. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.174

Babalska ZŁ, Korbecka-Paczkowska M, Karpiński TM. Wound Antiseptics and European Guidelines for Antiseptic Application in Wound Treatment. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(12):1253-257. DOI: 10.3390/ph14121253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14121253

Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(1):86-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo. 2014.11.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.022

Melhem M, Burki J, Algurabi O, Gilani S, Ghumman F, Sheriff M, Wani M, Haddad R, Madaan S. The safety and feasibility of simultaneous robotic repair of an inguinal hernia during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol. 2022; 56(3):197-205. DOI: 10.1080/21681805. 2022.2065358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2065358

Stakhovskyi EO, Bilyk VI. Profilaktyka infektsiinykh uskladnen pislia transuretralnoi rezektsii z pryvodu hiperplazii peredmikhurovoi zalozy [Prevention of infectious complications after transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Likarska sprava. 2002; 1:66-68. Ukrainian.

Published

2025-05-28

How to Cite

SHAPRYNSKYI, V. O., NAZARCHUK, O. A., GOROVYI, V. I., DOVHAN, I. I., BABINA, Y. M., & VERBA, M. A. (2025). THE EFFECT OF ANTISEPTICS ON THE MICROFLORA OF PERIOPERATIVE INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2025.2.15378

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS