OUR EXPERIENCE OF GUY’S STONE SCORE USE IN PREDICTION FOR THE POSSIBLE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY COMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2016.2.6422Abstract
We analyzed the treatment of 1952 patients with urolithiasis, who had undergone 2223 percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In
our study, complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy were observed in 507 cases, accounting 22.8 %. All complications
were distributed under a modifi ed Clavien-Dindo scale. Among all complications side effects of Ist and IInd group by Clavien
classifi cation (69.3 % cases) dominated. Postoperative mortality of patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy – 0.13 % cases.
For evaluation of the utility of the Guy’s stone score in prediction of PCNL complications we compared the frequencies of
complications depending on the GSS of patients. Among all 507 complicated cases in 46 (9.1 %) pts renal calculi were characterized
by GSS-1, in 87(17.2 %) pts – GSS-2, in 213(42.0 %) pts – GSS-3, in 161(31.8 %) pts – GSS-4. In major part of complicated
cases were diagnosed renal calculi with GSS-3 grade while severe complications (Сlavien-Dindo ІІІ-V) predominantly were
registered in patients with GSS 3-4 kidney stones. The Guy’s stone score 3–4 could be considered a prognostic factor of PCNL
complications development in patients with kidney stones.
References
Тиктинский О. Л. Мочекаменная болезнь / О. Л. Тиктин-
ский, В. П. Александров. – СПб. : Питер, 2000. – 384 с.
Боржієвський А. Ц. Черезшкірна ендоскопічна нефролі-
тотрипсія в лікуванні коралоподібних та великих каменів ни-
рок / А. Ц. Боржієвський. – Львів : Кварт, 2007. – 131 с.
Гулиев Б. Г. Осложнения перкутанной нефролитотрип-
сии / Б. Г. Гулиев // Эндоскопическая хирургия. – 2008. – № 1.
– С. 33–35.
Michel M. S. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy /
M. S. Michel, L. Trojan, J. J. Rassweiler // Eur. Urol. – 2007. –
Vol. 51. – P. 899–906.
Factors affecting success and complications in percutaneous
nephrolithotomy: A multivariate analysis of 1117 procedures /
E. Ozden, M. N. Mercimek, Y. Bostanci [et al.] // Eur. Urol.
Suppl. – 2011. – Vol. 10 № 2. – P. 70.
Incidence, prevention and management of complications
following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy / C. Seitz, M. Desai,
A. Hacker [et al.] // Eur. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 61 № 1. – P. 146–
Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy:
single surgeon experience / T. Akman, M. Binbay, E. Sari
[et al.] // J. Endourol. – 2011. – Vol. 25 – P. 327–333.
Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
with one-stage tract dilatation technique: a randomized
clinical trial / A. Aminsharifi , M. Alavi, G. Sadeghi [et al.] //
J. Endourol. – 2011. – Vol. 25 – P. 927–931.
Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous
nephrolithotomy: prospective study / R. Kukreja, M. Desai,
S. Patel [et al.] // J. Endourol. – 2004. – Vol. 18. – P. 715 – 722.
Value of preoperative stone scoring systems in
predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy /
S. Kumsar, H. Aydemir, F. Halis [et al.] // Cent. European J. Urol. –
– Vol. 68(3). – P. 353–357.
Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic
scan fi ndings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy
outcomes / F. C. Vicentini, G. S. Marchini, E. Mazzucchi
[et al.] // Urology. – 2014. – Vol. 83(6). – P. 1248–1253.
The Guy's stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous
nephrolithotomy procedures / K. Thomas, N. C. Smith, N. Hegarty,
J. M. Glass // Urology. – 2011. – Vol. 78(2). – P. 277–281.
Dindo D. Classifi cation of surgical complications: a new
proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results
of a survey / D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P-A. Clavien // Ann. Surg.
– 2004. – Vol. 240. – P. 205–213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
