MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2026.1.16090Keywords:
laparoscopic colectomy, complicated colon cancer, multivisceral resection, obstruction, peritoneal metastasis, systematic reviewAbstract
The aim of the work: to systematically evaluate evidence (2021–2025) on safety, feasibility, perioperative results, oncologic adequacy, and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in CCC.
Materials and Methods. PRISMA-guided systematic review of studies indexed in Scopus/PubMed/Web of Science (2021–2025). Inclusion: adult patients with complicated colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted colectomy; RCTs, prospective/retrospective cohorts, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Primary outcomes: R0 rate, lymph node yield, 3-/5-year OS/DFS, peritoneal recurrence. Secondary outcomes: morbidity, conversion, LOS, blood loss.
Results. Evidence indicates that in high-volume centers laparoscopic surgery for selected CCC achieves comparable R0 resection and lymph node harvest to open surgery, with reduced blood loss and shorter length of stay. For T4b/multivisceral resection (MVR), feasibility is demonstrated in experienced teams; however, conversion and operative time are higher. Some studies signal increased peritoneal recurrence risk in T4 disease after minimally invasive approaches, without consistent detriment to OS. In obstruction, laparoscopy in stable patients is associated with lower morbidity versus open surgery; perforation remains controversial. Simultaneous laparoscopic resection for synchronous liver metastases shows comparable oncologic outcomes to open surgery in selected cohorts.
Conclusions. Laparoscopic surgery for CCC is feasible and oncologically sound in selected patients treated by experienced surgeons. Careful case selection is critical in T4b disease and perforation.
Received: 19.01.2026 | Revised: 02.02.2026 | Accepted: 23.02.2026
References
Koval A, Grzhibovskyi Ya, Liubinets O, Savchenko A. [Colorectal cancer and its screening: level of public awareness based on questionnaire survey results]. Zdorovya Natsii. 2025;(2):38-45. DOI: 10.32782/2077-6594/2025.2/06. Ukrainian.
Yevtushenko OI, Kolesnyk OO, Sorokin BV, Burlaka AA, Smachylo II. Osoblyvosti perebihu ta analiz pislyaoperatsiynykh uskladnenʹ u khvorykh na rak obodovoyi kyshky [Peculiarities of the course and analysis of postoperative recovery in patients with colon cancer]. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L. Ya. Kovalchuka. 2021; 3:101-105. DOI: 10.11603/2414-4533.2021.3.12547. Ukrainian.
Bedenyuk AD, Hrytsenko YM, Dzyubanovsʹky IYa, Zaporozhetsʹ VV, Husak O, Kit O, Hrytsenko SI, Stefanchuk SS. Laparoskopichna kolorektalʹna khirurhiya: analiz pershykh operatsiy [Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of the first operations]. Zdobutky klinichnoyi i eksperymentalʹnoyi medytsyny. 2022; 3:19-21. Ukrainian.
Zhuang X Y, Zhang J L, Yang X F, Liu Z H. Minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision versus conventional right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2025;25:558. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-03282-0
Kryvoruchko IA, Ivanova YUV, Syvozhelizov AV, Nessonova MM, Knyhin MV. Khirurhichne likuvannya uskladnenoho raku tovstoyi kyshky: retrospektyvne doslidzhennya [Surgical treatment of complicated colon cancer: a retrospective study]. Ukrayinsʹkyy radiolohichnyy ta onkolohichnyy zhurnal. 2025; 33(2):154-70. DOI: 10.46879/ukroj.2.2025.154-170. Ukrainian.
Kubrak MA, Zavhorodnii SM, Daniliuk MB. Evaluation of laparoscopic techniques in the complex treatment of patients with complicated forms of colon cancer. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L. Ya. Kovalchuka.. 2025; 3:92-6. DOI: 10.11603/2414-4533.2025.3.15656.
Liu Z, Hu J, Suo L, et al. Laparoscopic radical resection for right sided colon cancer: network meta analysis. BMC Surg. 2024; 24:347. DOI: 10.1186/s12893 024 02603 z.
Zhang J, Sun J, Liu J, et al. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open multivisceral resection for clinical T4b colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024; 50(3):107316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107316.
Podda M, Pisanu A, Morello A, Segalini E, Jayant K, Gallo G, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Catena F, Di Saverio S. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and oncological outcomes. Br J Surg. 2022; 109(9):e314-e324. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac193.
Chen P, Zhou H, Chen CW, Qian S, Yang L, Zhou ZH. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for T4 colon cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies. Front Surg. 2022; 9:861640. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.861640.
Durains L, Steele S, Valente M, Abdelaziz T, Connelly T, Kessler H. Laparoscopic surgery for T4a and T4b colon cancer: are we playing with fire? Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(12):8950-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10336-3.
Hajie E, Aminizadeh E, Moghadam AD, Nikbakhsh R, Gonçalves H, Carvalho C, Parvaiz A, Kulu Y, Mehrabi A. Outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared with open and laparoscopic surgery. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(6):1703. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061703.
Yuval JB, Thompson HM, Verheij F, Fiasconaro M, Patil S, Vidmar M, Wei IH, Pappou E, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Parry L, Garcia-Aguilar J. Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of nonmetastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(4):745-54. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01047.
Wilson J, Maddineni S, Ahsan N, Mathew MP, Chilakuri N, Yadav N, Muñoz EJ, Nadeem MA, Abbas K, Razzak W, Abdin Z, Ahmed M. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Cureus. 2023; 15(5):e38974. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38974.
Nicolás M, Chervonko M, Ardiles V, Sánchez Clariá R, Mazza O, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, de Santibañes M. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of surgical margins and survival. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(6):2107-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02563-4.
Alvydas J, Lo WM, Tohme S, Geller DA. Outcomes and patient selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10):2764. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102764.
Bosanquet DC, Jasani R, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic emergency colectomy including obstructive CRC. Br J Surg. 2024; 111:1217-28. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac015.
Smith JJ, Temple LK. Emergency laparoscopic colectomy for obstructive colon cancer: review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 26:1441-51. DOI: 10.1007/s11605 022 05236 9.
Singh P, Lee KH, et al. Predictors of conversion and bleeding in laparoscopic CRC surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36:610-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08765-2.
Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, Cimbanassi S, Poiasina E, Ceresoli M, et al. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:36. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3.
Duran H, et al. Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35:1935 44. DOI: 10.1007/s00464 020 08077 6.
Wee IJY, So-Eng I, Chok AY, Sim E, Koh C, Lin W, Chang M, Tan E. Postoperative outcomes of prehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies. Ann Coloproctol. 2024; 40(1):1-13. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00564.
Neo VSQ, Jain SR, Yeo JW, Ng C, Gan TRX, Tan E, Chong C. Controversial aspects of colonic stenting in obstructive left-sided colon cancer: a critical appraisal using meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021; 36(10):2147-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03969-8.
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, et al. Endoscopic stenting vs urgent surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28:381-401. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i3.381.
Patel V, et al. Laparoscopic approach for obstructive left CRC: matched bleeding and transfusion outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022; 65:980-89. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002218.
Devoto L, Celentano V, Cohen R, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection clinical outcomes including intraoperative bleeding: systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40(3):523-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-04811-2.
Rezaei A, et al. Laparoscopic CRC surgery in patients ≥80 years old. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023; 105:550 8. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0121.
Mortensen K, Kehlet H, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery (ERAS®) – Part 1: Pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021; 65(7):878-87. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13851.
Nassar AH, Hodul PJ. Safety and feasibility of ERAS in emergency abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(8):4520-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09689-w.
Martínez-Martínez AB, Arbonés-Mainar JM. Immune response and hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic vs open CRC surgery. Cir Cir. 2022; 90:295-302. DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.21000146.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 А. І. МОЙСЕЄНКО
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
