The concentration of lidocaine in the blood after intravenous and epidural administration with extensive hepatic resections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2022.3.13259Keywords:
complex anesthesia, lidocaine intravenous administration, extensive hepatic resection, pain syndromeAbstract
The aim of the work: to identify the concentration of lidocaine in patients’ blood during an extensive hepatic resection, with its intravenous and epidural administration in dynamics for intra- and postoperative analgesia, to evaluate its analgesic effect and toxicity potential.
Materials and methods. The study included 27 patients, who underwent hepatic resection with preservation of 30–60 % of the parenchyma. For all patients, multicomponent intraoperative anesthesia was used. Depending on the adjuvant, patients were divided into two groups: the main group (group 1) consisted of 7 patients who received intravenous (IV) administration of lidocaine, and a comparison group of 20 patients (group 2) whose complex anesthesia was supplemented with thoracic epidural anesthesia (EDA).
To solve the tasks was to develop and validate a rapid, sensitive and robust method for the detection and quantification of lidocaine in human plasma using purification by coagulation and ultracentrifugation with cooling followed Liquid chromatography with Orbitrap HRMS method.
The method showed a dynamic linear range of 0.1 to 1000 ng/mL with a linearity expressed by the regression coefficient (R2) and a value of 0.9947. The quantitation limit (LOQ) was found to be 1 ng/mL and the detection limit (LOD) 0.3 ng/mL. Recovery accuracy and repeatability were satisfactory. Finally, the method was applied to 54 real human plasma.
Results and Discussion. 2 hours after the surgery, there was a tendency (P = 0.29) for a higher concentration of lidocaine in the blood by 28.8 % after epidural administration of lidocaine compared with intravenous administration (1.84 μg/ml in group 1, 2.37 µg/ml – in group 2, p = 0.29), with no fundamental difference 14 hours after surgery (2.62 µg/ml and 2.85 µg/ml, p = 0.76). Epidural administration of the drug was also accompanied by a tendency to increase the frequency of hemodynamic disorders, which was reflected in an increase in the dose of norepinephrine, which was intended to correct blood circulation parameters, by 1.3 times (total dose in group 1 (158.4±58.1) ng, group 2 – (206.9±76.4) ng, p = 0.14). No life-threatening toxic reactions were noticed in any of the cases.
The use of lidocaine as an adjuvant for intra- and postoperative analgesia by intravenous and epidural administration with extensive hepatic resections, in most cases, does not lead to an increase of the drug compound in the blood higher than the generally accepted toxic content is. The content of the drug in the blood can be exceeded with epidural administration compared with intravenous administration. The analgesic effect of intravenous lidocaine is not lower than the epidural and may even last longer until the first administration of a narcotic analgesic after surgery for pain relief. However, epidural block is accompanied by intraoperative hemodynamic instability and an increase in the total dose of norepinephrine to correct blood circulation parameters.
References
Wan, S.Z., Nie, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., & Zhu, X. (2020). Assessing the prognostic performance of the child-pugh, model for end-stage liver disease, and albumin-bilirubin scores in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: A Large Asian Cohort from Gastroenterology Department. Disease Markers, 2020, 5193028. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5193028
Hawker, G.A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care & Research, 63 Suppl 11, 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543
Jonkman, K., van Rijnsoever, E., Olofsen, E., Aarts, L., Sarton, E., van Velzen, M., Niesters, M., & Dahan, A. (2018). Esketamine counters opioid-induced respiratory depression. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120 (5), 1117-1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.021
Brown, E.N., Pavone, K.J., & Naranjo, M. (2018). Multimodal general anesthesia: Theory and practice. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 127 (5), 1246-1258. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003668
Marret, E., Rolin, M., Beaussier, M., & Bonnet, F. (2008). Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. The British Journal of Surgery, 95 (11), 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6375
Beaussier, M., Delbos, A., Maurice-Szamburski, A., Ecoffey, C., & Mercadal, L. (2018). Perioperative use of intravenous lidocaine. Drugs, 78 (12), 1229–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x
Sun, Y., Li, T., Wang, N., Yun, Y., & Gan, T.J. (2012). Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 55 (11), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318259bcd8
Kranke, P., Jokinen, J., Pace, N.L., Schnabel, A., Hollmann, M.W., Hahnenkamp, K., Eberhart, L.H., Poepping, D.M., & Weibel, S. (2015). Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7), CD009642. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub2
Weibel, S., Jokinen, J., Pace, N.L., Schnabel, A., Hollmann, M.W., Hahnenkamp, K., Eberhart, L.H., Poepping, D.M., Afshari, A., & Kranke, P. (2016). Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 116 (6), 770-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew101
Tran, A.N., & Koo, J.Y. (2014). Risk of systemic toxicity with topical lidocaine/prilocaine: A review. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology: JDD, 13(9), 1118-1122.
Esteve, N., Ferrer, A., Sansaloni, C., Mariscal, M., Torres, M., & Mora, C. (2017). Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in liver resection: Safety and effectiveness. Anestesia y analgesia epidural en la resección hepática: seguridad y efectividad. Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion, 64 (2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2016.06.006
Page, A., Rostad, B., Staley, C.A., Levy, J.H., Park, J., Goodman, M., Sarmiento, J.M., Galloway, J., Delman, K.A., & Kooby, D.A. (2008). Epidural analgesia in hepatic resection. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 206 (6), 1184-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.041
Beverly, A., Kaye, A.D., Ljungqvist, O., & Urman, R.D. (2017). Essential Elements of Multimodal Analgesia in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Guidelines. Anesthesiology Clinics, 35 (2), e115-e143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018
Foo, I., Macfarlane, A., Srivastava, D., Bhaskar, A., Barker, H., Knaggs, R., Eipe, N., & Smith, A.F. (2021). The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety. Anaesthesia, 76 (2), 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15270
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hospital Surgery. Journal named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
