Open office-based phlebology of primary chronic vein disease of lower extremities

Authors

  • V. M. Antonyuk-Kysil Rivne State Humanitarian University Rivne City Hospital
  • I. Ya. Dziubanovskyi I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • E. F. Kucheruk Rivne City Hospital
  • S. A. Nevmerzhytsky Rivne City Hospital
  • A. M. Prodan I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • N. A. Al Jehani I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.3.12545

Keywords:

primary chronic venous disease, CHIVA, office-based surgery

Abstract

The aim of the work:  to evaluate the effectiveness of the CHIVA technique in the correction of venous insufficiency of varying degrees in an outpatient setting.

Materials and мethods. The results of open surgical treatment of 578 patients (21.45 % – men and 78.55 % – women) with primary chronic vein disease of the lower extremities were analyzed. There were two groups of patients who underwent planned interventions of 423 (71.18%) patients – group 1 and 155 (26.82 %) patients in an urgent order – group 2. The distribution of patients by severity of primary chronic vein disease was performed according to the classification of CEAP (2020): C2s- – 355 (61.42 %), C3s – 159 (27.51 %), C4s – 38 (6.57 %), C5s – 16 (2.77 %), C6s – 10 (1.73 %). In the structure of group 2, acute thrombophlebitis of the subcutaneous veins of the lower extremities was diagnosed in 143 (92.25 %), bleeding from varicose veins – 12 (7.74 %). The varicose anamnesis of the operated made from 3 to 25 years (on the average (10.4±5.8) years). Bilateral pathology was found in 37.50 % of people, in 62.50 % – unilateral, mainly on the left lower extremity. The degree of clinical manifestations of the disease before and after surgery was assessed using scales (VCSS, VDS, VSS).

Results and Discussion. A comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of two groups (emergency and planned treatment) with primary chronic venous disease of the lower extremities in the dynamics of the CHIVA method on the principles of “office-based surgery” showed that the VSDS criterion was normalized in both groups. Among those operated on as planned, this figure was 89.90 % in the early postoperative period. After emergency surgery, 78.30 % of patients recovered somewhat more slowly with its normalization in the late postoperative period. According to the VDS criterion, among those operated on in a planned manner, the recovery process was faster (96.40 %) in the early postoperative period, and full recovery within 3 weeks was found in 89.70 % of operated patients. According to the VSDS criterion, pathological venous reflux in the subcutaneous vein system in the early and late postoperative periods was not diagnosed in any case.

References

Zolotukhin, I.F., Seliverstov, E.I., Shevczov, Yu.N., Avakncz, I.P., Nikishkov, A.I., Tatarinczev, A.M., Kirienko A.I.. (2016). Raspostranennost khronicheskikh zabolevaniy ven: rezultaty populyatsionnogo epidemiologicheskogo issledovaniya [Prevalence of chronic vein disease: Results of a population epidemiological study]. Flebologiya – Phlebology, 10 (3), 119-125 [in Russian].

Rabe, E., & Pannier, F. (2017). Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders. In Handbook of Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. CRC Press.

Adams, W.. (2013). International Association for Ambulatory Surgery (IAAS). Day Surgery Australia, 12 (1), 20-21.

Franceschi, C. (1988). Théorie et pratique de la cure conservatrice et hémodynamique de l'insuffisance veineuse en ambulatoire [CHIVA]. Ed. de l'Armançon.

Franceschi, C., & Ermini, S. (2014). The evaluation of essential elements defining varicose vein mapping. Veins and Lymphatics, 3 (5).

Franceschi, C., Cappelli, M., Ermini, S., Gianesini, S., Mendoza, E., Passariello, F., Zamboni, P.. (2016). CHIVA hemodynamic concept, strategy and results. Int. Angiol., 35 (1), 8-30.

Carandina S., Mari C., De Palma M., Marcellino N.G., Cisno C., Legnaro A., Liboni A., Zamboni P. (2008). Varicose vein stripping vs haemodynamic correction (CHIVA): a long term randomized trial. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 35 (2), 230-237.

Bellmunt-Montoya, S., Escribano, J.M., Dilme, J., & Martinez-Zapata, M.J. (2015). CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6).

Solis, J.V., Ribe, L., Portero, J.L., & Rio, J. (2009). Stripping saphenectomy, CHIVA and laser ablation for the treatment of the saphenous vein insufficiency. Ambul Surg., 15 (1), 11-14.

Lurie, F., Passman, M., Meisner, M., Dalsing, M., Masuda, E., Welch, H., ... & Wakefield, T. (2020). The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 8 (3), 342-352.

Kakkos, S.K., Rivera, M.A., Matsagas, M.I., Lazarides, M.K., Robless, P., Belcaro, G., Geroulakos G. (2003). Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery. J. Vasc. Surg., 38 (2), 224-228.

Published

2021-12-03

How to Cite

Antonyuk-Kysil, V. M., Dziubanovskyi, I. Y., Kucheruk, E. F., Nevmerzhytsky, S. A., Prodan, A. M., & Al Jehani, N. A. (2021). Open office-based phlebology of primary chronic vein disease of lower extremities. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (3), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.3.12545

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK