The latest approaches in surgical treatment of combined diseases of anal canal and rectum

Authors

  • V. V. Balytskyy M. Pyrohov Vinnytsia National Medical University Public Non-Profit Enterprise “ Khmelnytskyi Regional Hospital” under Khmelnytskyi Regional Council

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.3.12542

Keywords:

combined anorectal pathology, radio-wave surgery device, high-frequency electrosurgery device, surgical treatment

Abstract

The aim of the work: to make a comparative evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of patients with combined anorectal pathology using modern high-frequency electrosurgical and radiosurgical devices and also traditional techniques.

Materials and Methods. The results of surgical treatment of 112 patients of the control group with combined anorectal pathology who were operated with a conventional surgical scalpel and 689 patients with combined pathology of the anal canal and rectum using modern electro- and radiosurgical technologies were analyzed. Among them 245 (35.5.8 %) patients were operated by radio-wave surgery device “Surgitron”, 170 (24.7 %) patients with high-frequency electrosurgery device “ERBE ICC 200”,  114 (16.5 %) patients with high-frequency electrosurgery device “EFA”, 160 (23.2 %) patients with high-frequency electrosurgery device “KLS Martin”.

Results and Discussion. In case of using the radiowave surgery device “Surgitron” edema of the anodermal “bridges” occurred with a frequency of 0.8 %, when using high-frequency electrosurgery devices “ERBE ICC 200” – 1.1 %, “EFA” – 1.7 %, “KLS Martin” – 1.2 % and in the control group – 5.4 %. The formation of subcutaneous hematomas using radio-surgery device “Surgitron” was observed with a frequency of 0.8 %, using high-frequency electrosurgery devices “ERBE ICC 200” – 0.6%, “EFA” – 0.8 %, “KLS Martin” – 1.2 % and in the control group – 7.1 %. Occurrence of acute subcutaneous and submucosal paraproctitis when using the device of radio-wave surgery “Surgitron” was established in 0.4 % of cases, when using devices of high-frequency electrosurgery “ERBE ICC 200” – 0.6 %, “EFA” – 1.7 %, “KLS Martin” – 0.6 % and in the control group – 3.6 %. Postoperative bleeding using radiosurgery device “Surgitron” occurred with a frequency of 0.4 %, using high-frequency electrosurgery devices “ERBE ICC 200” – 0.6 %, “EFA” – 1.7 %, “KLS Martin” – 0.6 % and in the control group – 4.4 %. The formation of hypertrophied perianal skin tags in the first group using the radio-wave surgery device “Surgitron” was absent and when using high-frequency electrosurgery devices “ERBE ICC 200” was detected in 1.1 %, “EFA” – 1.7 %, KLS Martin” – 0.8 % and in the control group – 8 %. Recurrences of anorectal pathology when using the device of radiowave surgery “Surgitron” were absent, when using devices of high-frequency electrosurgery “ERBE ICC 200” they were only 0.6 %, “EFA” – 0.8 %, “KLS Martin” – 0.6 % and in the control group – 2.7 %. The formation of scar strictures of the anal canal was not diagnosed in any of the studied groups, while in the control group they were detected with a frequency of 1.8 %.

References

Borota, A.V., Kuhto, A.P., Bazijan-Kuhto, N.K., & Borota, A.A. (2018). Sravnitelnіy analiz hirurgicheskogo lecheniya sochetannoy neopuholevoy patologii analnogo kanala i pryamoj kishki [Comparative analysis of surgical treatment of combined non-tumor anal canal and rectal pathology]. Novoobrazovanie – Neoplasm, 10 (1), 18-21 [in Russian].

Kondratenko, A.P. (2018). Suchasni metodyky likuvannia hemoroidalnoi khvoroby z vykorystanniam riznykh vydiv enerhii (ohliad literatury) [Modern techniques of treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using different kinds of energies (literature review)]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal khirurhii – Ukrainian Journal of Surgery, 2 (37), 68-73 [in Ukrainian].

Borota, A.V., Kuhto, A.P., Bazijan-Kuhto, N.K., & Borota, A.A. (2017). Hirurgicheskoe lechenie sochetannoy neopuholevoy patologii analnogo kanala i pryamoj kishki [Surgical treatment of the combined non-tumor anorectal pathology]. Novoobrazovanie – Neoplasm, 9 (4), 237-239 [in Russian].

Zutshi, M. (2016). Anorectal disease: Contemporary management. Springer Cham, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Herold, A., Lehur, P.A., Matzel, K., & O'Connell, R. (2017). Coloproctology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Abcarian, H., Cintron, J., & Nelson, R. (2017). Complications of anorectal surgery: Prevention and management. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Lohsiriwat, V. (2016). Anorectal emergencies. World J. Gastroenterol., 22 (26), 5867-5878.

Gain, M.Ju., & Shahraj, S.V. (2011). Maloinvazivnye tehnologii v kompleksnom lechenii gemorroja [Minimally invasive technologies in complex treatment of hemorrhoids]. Novosti hirurgii – Surgery News, 4 (19), 113-122 [in Russian].

Sturiale, A., Fabiani, B., Menconi, C., Cafaro, D., Fusco, F., Bellio, G.,… Naldini, G. (2018). Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a survey study with mean follow-up of 12 years. Tech. Coloproctol., 22 (9), 689-696.

Scheyer, M., Antonietti, E., Rollinger, G., Lancee, S., & Pokorny, H. (2015). Hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR): retrospective analysis of 408 patients in a single center. Tech. Coloproctol.,19 (1), 5-9.

Published

2021-12-03

How to Cite

Balytskyy, V. V. (2021). The latest approaches in surgical treatment of combined diseases of anal canal and rectum. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (3), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.3.12542

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK