Comparative assessment of imaging in the performance of simultaneous Laparoscopic treatment of gallstone disease and hiatal hernia

Authors

  • M. M. Halei Volynian Regional Clinical Hospital
  • O. I. Dziubanovskyi Ternopil District Council “Ternopil Central District Hospital”
  • M. O. Onys­kiv Ternopil District Council “Ternopil Central District Hospital”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.2.12305

Keywords:

gallstone disease, hiatal hernia, simultaneous surgery, laparoscopy

Abstract

The aim of the work: to determine and evaluate the visualization in the performance of conventional laparoscopic operations and simultaneous laparoscopic operations for the treatment of gallstone disease and hiatal hernia; identify the advantages and disadvantages of methods; assess the impact of the choice of laparoscopic techniques on ergonomics during surgery.

Materials and Methods. 156 patients were treated in Volynian Regional Clinical Hospital

 Laparoscopic Surgery Unit during the period from 2013 to 2019, who underwent laparoscopic crurography with Toupet fundoplication and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our own developed technique. Comparison with the results of treatment of gallstone disease using the “French” method. The method with the null hypothesis, Pearson, Tukey, Mann-Whitney analysis were used.

Results and Discussion. The difference between the ports for asthenic and hypersthenic physiques was 4.4 cm and 3.0 cm, visualization area was (12.44±4.01) and (9.54±2.27) cm2 (which is statistically significant (p = 0.715 )), the angle between the instruments was (62.31±7.35) o and (57.29±6.764) o, the distance between the laparoscope and the object of operation was (3.54±0.47) cm and (3.41±0.478) cm for the studied and control groups, respectively. Simultaneous laparoscopic intervention did not impairs visualization and increases comfort during simultaneous surgery compared to French cholecystectomy. The use of the developed simultaneous technique did not worsed the postoperative consequences. The technique developed on the basis of Volynian Regional Clinical Hospital Laparoscopic Surgery Unit is rather effective and suitable for use.

References

Dumonceau, J.M., Andriulli, A., Elmunzer, B.J., Mariani, A., Meister, T., Deviere, J., …, & Kapral, C. (2014). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Updated June 2014. Endoscopy, 46, 799-815.

GallRiks. Annual report 2016. Retrieved from: http: //www.ucr.uu.se/gallriks/fou/arsrapporter.

Freeman, M.L. (2002). Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-related risk factors. JOP, 3, 169-176.

Chen, J.J., Wang, X.M., Liu, X.Q., Li, W., Dong, M., Suo, Z.W., ..., & Li, Y. (2014). Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review of clinical trials with a large sample size in the past 10 years. Eur. J. Med. Res., 15, 19-26.

Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M.R., Spirito, F., ..., & Forlano, R. (2007). Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 102 (8), 1781-1788.

Cotton, P.B. (2013). ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography). Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Digestive Disease Center. Retrieved 2013-06-09.

Begley, S., Clarke, T. (2015). FDA knew devices spread fatal superbug but doesn᾽t order fix. Reuters. Retrieved 20 February 2015.

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007345.pub2/full

Brand, M, Bizos, D, & O'Farrell, P., Jr (2010). Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cochr. Database Syst. Rev., 10, CD007345. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007345.

Kolkin, Ya.H., Hatsko, V.V., Shatalov, O.D., Gredzhev, F.A., Kuzmenko, O.Ye., Pishchansky, R.Ye.,, ..., & Bazian, N.K. (2010). Udoskonalennia laparoskopichnykh i tradytsiinykh vidkrytykh vtruchan u khvorykh na dobroiakisni oseredkovi utvory pechinky [Improvement of laparoscopic and traditional open interventions in patients with benign focal liver tumors]. Shpytalna khirurhiia – Hospital Surgery, 3 [in Ukrainian].

Semeniuk, Yu.S., Potiyko, O., Sydoruk, I., Ordynskyi, Yu.M., Fedoruk, V., Minich, V.G., ..., & Andrushkiv, N. (2015). Dosvid laparoskopichnykh operatsii u khvorykh na zhovchnokamianu khvorobu [Experience of laparoscopic operations in patients with gallstone disease]. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L.Ya. Kovalchuka – Hospital surgery. Journal named after L. Ya. Kovalchuk, 3, 33-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2015.3.5025 [in Ukrainian].

Nychytailo, M.Iu., Zahriichuk, M.S., Bulyk, I.I., Masiuk, Iu.I., Homan, A.V., & Kondratiuk, V.A. (2015). Symultanni laparoskopichni operatsii z pryvodu zhovchokamianoi khvoroby ta hryzhi perednoi cherevnoi stinky [Simultant laparoscopic operations for biliary calculi disease and hernia of the anterior abdominal wall]. Klinichna khirurhiia – Clin. Surg., 3, 21-23 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-08-27

How to Cite

Halei, M. M., Dziubanovskyi, O. I., & Onys­kiv, M. O. (2021). Comparative assessment of imaging in the performance of simultaneous Laparoscopic treatment of gallstone disease and hiatal hernia. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.2.12305

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK