Evaluation of the feasibility of using a one-stage strategy for the treatment of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis by performing simultaneous laparoscopic interventions with a two-stage strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2021.1.12023Keywords:
ERCP, laparoscopy, simultaneous operations, gallstone disease, MRCPAbstract
The aim of the work: to study the complications associated with a one-stage strategy for the treatment of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis, which involves simultaneous cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy with intraoperative cholangiography using our own developed method of setting laparoscopic ports. Evaluation of the feasibility of using each of the methods.
Materials and Methods. In the period from 2015 to 2019, 118 patients with a combination of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis were treated. All patients underwent surgical treatment using the developed technique of simultaneous operations. The comparison of treatment duration and safety profile of the developed method was performed with that for the two-stage method using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The control points of the studies were the length of hospital stay and the frequency of complications. Data on these indicators are obtained from the publications of our colleagues.
Results and Discussion. The duration of treatment in the study group was 4 bed-days, which is less than the duration of treatment in the experiments of our colleagues (at least 6 days). The level of complications when using the one-stage method with own technique was 0.85 %, which is significantly less than the total level of local and general complications typical for ERCP (6.85 %). If ERCP is recurrent (12–23 %), the level of complications increases to 19.35 %, which in our opinion is an unacceptable risk. Acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, intestinal perforation, and septic conditions, including those associated with resistant microflora, are also uncommon complications for one-stage method. The use of a non-invasive method (MRCP) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is a priority over invasive and dangerous ERCP.
References
Dumonceau, J.M., Andriulli, A., Elmunzer, B.J., Mariani, A., Meister, T., Deviere, J., …, & Kapral, C. (2014). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Updated June 2014. Endoscopy, 46, 799-815.
GallRiks. Annual report 2016. Retrieved from: http: //www.ucr.uu.se/gallriks/fou/arsrapporter.
Freeman, M.L. (2002). Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-related risk factors. JOP, 3, 169-176.
Chen, J.J., Wang, X.M., Liu, X.Q., Li, W., Dong, M., Suo, Z.W., ..., & Li, Y. (2014). Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review of clinical trials with a large sample size in the past 10 years. Eur. J. Med. Res., 15, 19-26.
Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M.R., Spirito, F., ..., & Forlano, R. (2007). Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 102 (8), 1781-1788.
Cotton, P.B. (2013). ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography). Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Digestive Disease Center. Retrieved 2013-06-09.
Begley, S., Clarke, T. (2015). FDA knew devices spread fatal superbug but doesn᾽t order fix. Reuters. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007345.pub2/full
Brand, M, Bizos, D, & O’Farrell, P., Jr (2010). Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cochr. Database Syst. Rev., 10, CD007345. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007345.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ajg2007345.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/145749690509400108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Hospital Surgery. Journal named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).