Treatment efficacy of widespread secondary purulent peritonitis with the use Of relaparotomy

Authors

  • S. Y. Zaporozhan I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • V. O. Tkach Rivne Regional Clinical Hospital
  • O. A. Dombrovskyi I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University Rivne Regional Clinical Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.3.11462

Keywords:

peritonitis, relaparotomy, Mannheim Peritonitis Index

Abstract

The aim of the work: to analyze the results of treatment of patients with common secondary purulent peritonitis and compare the effectiveness of different treatments.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of 545 patients with secondary purulent peritonitis who were treated in the Department of General Surgery and Proctology Rivne Regional Clinical Hospital from 2015 to 2019 was performed. Incidence: local (demarcated) peritonitis was detected in 47.7 %, widespread or diffuse in 16.51 %, general or total in 35.78 %. According to the Mannheim Peritonitis Index, patients were divided into three groups MPI <16 in 36.6 %; 17 <MPI <21 in 31.7 %; MPI> 22 in 31.7 %.

Results and Discussion. In 51 patients, relaparotomy was performed, which is 9.26 %. Of these, relaparotomy “on demand” was performed in 36 (6.51 %), and programmed relaparotomy – in 15 (2.75 %). The number of relaparotomies in one patient ranged from 1 to 15. The average number – 3. In the structure of diseases about which relaparotomy was performed: acute destructive pancreatitis in 22 (44.43 %) patients, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer complicated by perforation of ulcer 5 (11, 12%), gallstone disease and its complications 5 (11.12 %), mesenteric vascular thrombosis 3 (5.55 %), colon and rectal cancer 3 (5.55 %), diverticular disease of the colon and other inflammatory bowel diseases, gastric cancer, damage to the hollow organs of the abdominal cavity 11 (22.23 %), infected ascites on the background of CKD 2 (3.67 %). Among 545 operated patients in the postoperative period, 135 patients died (24.77 %). In the group of patients after relaparotomies, 20 patients died (39.2 %).

References

Dziubanovskyi, I.Ya., & Mihenko, B.O. (2012). Komlpleksne likuvannia khvorykh na hostryi poshyrenyi perytonit [Comprehensive treatment of patients with acute peritonitis]. Halytskyi likarskyi visnyk – Galician Medical Bulletin, 19, 3 (2), 42-44 [in Ukrainian].

Dziubanovskyi, I.Ya., & Benedykt, V.V. (2014). Hostryi poshyrenyi perytonit. Laparostomiya chy prohramovana relaparotomiia? [Acute widespread peritonitis. Laparostomy or programmed relaparotomy?]. Klinich. anat. ta operat. khirurh. – Clinical Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 13 (1), 53-55 [in Ukrainian].

Savelyev, V,S., Gelfand, B.R., & Filimonov, M.I. (Eds.). (2006). Peritonit: prakticheskoye rukovodstvo [Peritonitis: a practical guide]. Moscow: Littera [in Russian].

Radzikhovskiy A.P., Bobrov, O.E., & Nayshtetik, V.Ya. (2000). Ocherki khirugii peritonita [Essays on peritonitis surgery]. Kyiv [in Russian].

Chernov, V.N., Belik, B.M., & Pshukov, Kh.Sh. (2004). Prognozirovaniye iskhoda i vybor khirirgicheskoy taktiki pri gnoynom peritonite [Prediction of outcome and choice of surgical tactics for advanced purulent peritonitis]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – Surgery. Journal by N.I. Pirogov, 3, 21-24 [in Russian].

Bosscha, K., van Vroonhoven, T.J., & van der Werken, C. (1999). Surgical management of severe secondary peritonitis. Br. J. Surg., 86 (11), 1371-1377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01258.x

Christou, N.V., Barie, P.S., Dellinger, E.P., Waymack, J.P., & Stone, H.H. (1993). Surgical Infection Society intra-abdominal infection study: prospective evaluation of management techniques and outcome. Arch. Surg., 128 (2), 193-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420140070011

Farthmann, E.H., & Schoffel, U. (1990). Principles and limitations of operative management of intraabdominal infections. World J. Surg., 14 (2), 210-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664875

Kirkpatrick, A.W., Roberts, D.J., De Waele, J., Jaeschke, R., Malbrain, M.L.N.G., et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine, 39 (7), 1190-1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z

Koperna, T., & Schulz, F. (1996). Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis: do we need new scoring systems? Arch. Surg., 131 (2), 180-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140070019

Lamme, B., Boermeester, M.A., Belt, E.J., van Till, J.W., Gouma, D.J., & Obertop, H. (2004). Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secon­dary peritonitis. Br. J. Surg., 91 (8), 1046-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4517

Mazuski, J.E., & Solomkin, J.S. (2009). Intra-abdominal infections. Surg. Clin. N. Am., 89, 421-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2008.12.001

Nathens, A.B., & Rotstein, O.D. (1994). Therapeutic options in peritonitis. Surg. Clin. North Am., 74 (3), 677- 692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46336-X

Salamone, G., Licari L., Falco N., Augello G., Tutino R., Campanella S., Guercio G., & Gulotta, G. (2016). Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and elderly population: prognostic evaluation in acute secondary peritonitis. G. Chir., 37 (6), 243-249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2016.37.6.243

Van Goor, H. (2002). Interventional management of abdominal sepsis: when and how. Langenbecks Arch Surg., 387 (5-6), 191-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-002-0309-7

Wittmann, D.H., Schein, M., & Condon, R.E. (1996). Management of secondary peritonitis. Ann. Surg., 224 (1), 10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199607000-00003

Downloads

Published

2020-10-23

How to Cite

Zaporozhan, S. Y., Tkach, V. O., & Dombrovskyi, O. A. (2020). Treatment efficacy of widespread secondary purulent peritonitis with the use Of relaparotomy. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (3), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.3.11462

Issue

No. 3 (2020)

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK

License

Authors who publish their work in Hospital Surgery. Journal by L. Ya. Kovalchuk agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.  
  2. Лицензия Creative Commons
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)