Intracolonic pressure at reconstructive-restorative surgery in ostomy patients

Authors

  • V. I. Rusyn Uzhhorod National University
  • S. M. Chobey Uzhhorod National University
  • O. O. Dutko Uzhhorod National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.1.10741

Keywords:

intracolonic pressure, large intestine anastomosis, reconstructive operation, stoma

Abstract

The aim of the work: to improve treatment outcomes in patients with surgical pathology of the colon by working-out and implementing pathogeneticly grounded treatment algorithm and anastomosis creation technology, aimed at reducing the frequency of postoperative      complications.

Materials and Methods. The intracolonic pressure (ICP) was measured in the postoperative period in a group of 30 patients. During the operation, except transanal drainage, which was located higher from anastomosis by 5–10 cm, was inserted a tube with diameter of 0.5 cm., which end was located at large intestine anastomosis (LIA). Pressure measurement was performed by Waldman method within 72 hours after the operation, every 4 hours. There were performed 2 measurements – before and after lavage of transanal drainage. During performing reconstructive operation worked-out LIA technique  was performed 17 times, two-row suture manual LIA – 3, machine LIA -10. 

Results and Discussion. It was found that in the postoperative period the ICP  was increasing during the first 24–36 hours to an average of (5.3±0.1) mm Hg, with a further reduction of it’s level over the next 12–20 hours to (2.1±0.3) mm Hg. In 20 minutes after the lavage of transanal drainage the ICP reduced by an average of (3.0±1.3) mm Hg. This decreasing was detained for 3–5 hours, then was noticed a gradual increasing of ICP. In case of using traditional two-row suture anastomosis in 2 patients was noticed complicated postoperative period – the anastomotic leakage in one patient, the second had anastomositis. Worked-out LIA technique was used in 17 patients, machine LIA – in 10 patients, while anastomositis developed in 1 patient. It was found that  in all patients with disorders of suture wound healing  was marked the increasing of ICP after 16–60 hours to (11.4±0.2) mm Hg, with a peak of ICP (16.3–17.1) mm Hg. This dynamic of pressure was observed until the development of intestinal suture failure (anastomotic leakage), with a reduction of ICP after it. In patients with anastomositis such a reduction of ICP wasn’t noticed. It had importance not only the increasing the level of pressure 16.3–17.1 mm Hg, but it’s duration for 12–18 hours.

References

Agaev, E.K. (2012). Nesostoyatelnost shvov kishechnykh anastomozov u bolnykh posle ekstrennoy i neotlozhnoy rezektsii kishki [Anastomotic failure after urgent bowel resection]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov, 1, 34-37 [in Russian].

Bereznytskyi, Ya.S., Haponov, A.V., & Turchyn, V.M. (2009). Obhruntuvannia vykonannia pervynno-vidnovnykh ope­ratyvnykh vtruchan pry obstruktyvnii neprokhidnosti obodovoi kyshky [Reasoning of primary-reconstructive operations after large bowel obstruction]. Ukrainskyi Zhurnal Khirurhii – Ukrainian Jornal of Surgery, 5, 11-13 [in Ukrainian].

Zakharash, M.P., Poida, A.I., Melnik, V.M. (2006). Vosstanovitelnye operatsii v khirurgii tolstoy kishki [Reconstructive operations in colon surgery]. Materіali ІІ zizdu koloproktolohіv Ukrainy za mіzhnarodnoiu uchastiu – Materials of the II Congress of Coloproctologists of Ukraine with International Participation, (pp. 403-405). [in Russian].

Totikov, Z.V., Totikov, V.Z., Kachmazov, A.K., Medo­edov, V.V., Kalitsova, M.V., & Malsagov, R.Yu. (2013). Sposob profilaktiki nesostoyatelnosti anastomoza posle perednikh rezek­tsiy pryamoy kishki i rekonstruktivno-vosstanovitelnykh operatsiy [Method of prevention of anastomotic failure after rectum resetion and reconstructive operations]. Kubanskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy vestnik – Kuban Scientific Medical Journal, 4, 109-111 [in Russian].

Dinning, P.G., Carrington, E.V., & Scott, S.M. (2015). The use of colonic and anorectal high-resolution manometry and its place in clinical work and in research. Neurogastroenterology & Moti­lity, 27 (12), 1693-1708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12632

Shogan, B.D., Carlisle, E.M., Alverdy, J.C., & Umanskiy, K. (2013). Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 17 (9), 1698-1707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2227-0

Siegel, R., DeSantis, C., & Jemal, A. (2014). Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64 (2), 104-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21220

Published

2020-01-16

How to Cite

Rusyn, V. I., Chobey, S. M., & Dutko, O. O. (2020). Intracolonic pressure at reconstructive-restorative surgery in ostomy patients. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.1.10741

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCE OF WORK