Experimental reasoning of interpheron 2b intraperitoneal application for treatment of acute peritonitis

Authors

  • A. F. Grynchuk Bukovinian State Medical University
  • I. S. Davydenko Bukovinian State Medical University
  • F. V. Grynchuk Bukovinian State Medical University
  • I. Iu. Polianskiy Bukovinian State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.1.10736

Keywords:

acute peritonitis, sanation, interferon α2b

Abstract

The aim of the work: to investigate experimentally the feasibility of intraperitoneal application of interferon α2b for the treatment of acute peritonitis.

Materials and Methods. 64 white nonlinear rats were used in the experiment. Peritonitis was modeled by intraperitoneal puncture application of 20 % autofeces solution. In 12 h after the simulation  laparotomy and sanation of the abdominal cavity was performed. In the control group (32 animals), peritoneal cavity was sanated with decamethoxin solution and 0.9 % NaCl solution. In the experimental group (32 animals) thereafter, a solution of interferon α2b at a dose of 0.3 million IU per 100 g of mass was applied into the abdominal cavity. In 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, a relaparotomy was performed and the parietal peritoneum was removed for histological examination. The tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin.

Results and Discussion. In the control group in 6 h after sanation on the background of distinct inflammatory changes of the parietal peritoneum, there are signs of an improper reaction of a nonspecific cellular level of protection, the manifestations of which are activated only after 12 h; the initiation of a specific link occurs after 24 h, and within 48 h no signs of regeneration processes are detected. In the study group in 6 h there are signs of an adequate response of the nonspecific cellular protection against the background of less pronounced inflammatory changes of the parietal peritoneum; after 12 h signs of activation of a specific link, and after 48 h – signs of the development of regeneration processes.

References

Dziubanovskyi, I.Ya., & Benedykt, V.V. (2014). Hostryi poshyrenyi perytonit. Laparostomiia chy prohramovana relaparotomiia? [Acute generelized peritonitis. laparostomy or planned relaparotomy?]. Klinichna anatomiia ta operatyvna khirurhiia – Clinical Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 13 (1), 53-55 [in Ukrainian].

Sartelli, M., Chichom-Mefire, A., Labricciosa, F. M., Hardcastle, T., Abu-Zidan F. M., Adesunkanmi, A. K. … Catena F. (2017). The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 10, 12, 29. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6

Boiko, V.V., Rohachov, V.K., & Tymchenko, M.Ie. (2013). Zastosuvannia rozchynu dekametoksynu v likuvanni rozpovsiudzhenykh form perytonitu [Application of decametoxine solution in the treatment of diffuse forms of peritonitis]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv Surgical School, 3, 88-92 [in Ukrainian].

Hesami, M.A., Alipour, H., Daylami, H.N., Alipour, B., Bazargan-Hejazi, S., & Ahmadi, A. (2014). Irrigation of abdomen with Imipenem solution decreases surgical site infections in patients with perforated appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Red. Crescent Med. Journal, 16 (4), e12732. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12732

Ross, J.T., Matthay, M.A., & Harris, H.W. (2018). Secondary peritonitis: principles of diagnosis and intervention. BMJ, 361, k1407. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1407

Ağca, B., İşcan, A.Y., Polat, E., Memişoğlu, K. (2018). The antibacterial effect of peritoneal fluid in experimental peritonitis. Ulus Travma Acil. Cerrahi Derg., 24 (5), 387-390. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.10452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2018.10452

Capobianco, A., Cottone, L., Monno, A., Manfredi, A.A., & Rovere-Querini, P. (2017). The peritoneum: healing, immunity, and diseases. The Journal of Pathology, 243 (2), 137-147. doi: 10.1002/path.4942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4942

Granslo, H.N., Aarag Fredheim, E.G., Esaiassen, E., Christophersen, L., Jensen, P.O., Mollnes, T.E. … Cavanagh, J.P. (2019). The synthetic antimicrobial peptide LTX21 induces inflammatory responses in a human whole blood model and a murine peritoneum model. APMIS, 127 (6), 475-483. doi: 10.1111/apm.12946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12946

Published

2020-01-16

How to Cite

Grynchuk, A. F., Davydenko, I. S., Grynchuk, F. V., & Polianskiy, I. I. (2020). Experimental reasoning of interpheron 2b intraperitoneal application for treatment of acute peritonitis. Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, (1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.1.10736

Issue

Section

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS