IDENTIFYING OF THE PRIORITY AREAS FOR IMPROVING OF STATE AND PUBLIC REGULATION IN PHARMACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2312-0967.2017.1.7529Keywords:
pharmacy, government and public regulatory, improvement, priorities, questionnaire, pharmaceutical workers.Abstract
The aim of the work. Determination of priority directions for improving state and public regulation in pharmacy.
Materials and Methods. We used a systematic approach, analytical, statistical, graphical and questionnaire survey method for respondents.
Results and Discussion. Based on the results of the questionnaire survey of specialists, problems were identi ed and the most important priorities for reforming the system of state and public regulation in pharmacy were established. The results of the survey of specialists from 2011–2012 and 2015–2016 were compared with the research data for 2007. An actual task was carried out to assess the problems of the development of domestic pharmacy and determine the priority directions for improving state and public regulation in domestic pharmacy over the past ten years.
Conclusions. It was found that respondents consider economic methods to be the most effective means of state regulation (more than 71 % of pharmacy specialists and 80 % of managers, respectively). It should be noted that in the last ten years priorities have changed in this case, in the 2007 study, more than 80.0 % of respondents (the rst place) preferred using legal means. It is established that more than 60 % of managers and specialists consider full transfer to the public organizations of the function of attesting pharmaceutical personnel. More than 35 % of pharmacists consider it possible to transfer to public organizations and such functions as licensing of activities related to the retail sale of medicines, as well as the accreditation of institutions, institutions and enterprises by the pharmaceutical industry (more than 17 %).
References
Homenko VM. [Research of modern mechanisms of state and social regulation in pharmacy]. Visnyk farmatsii. 2007;3(51): 38-42. Ukrainian.
Nemchenko AS. [De ning policy priorities of the pharmaceutical industry based on expert assessments]. Farmats zhurn. 2008;2: 3-8. Ukrainian.
Nemchenko AS. [The problems of the pharmaceutical industry: peer review of experts]. Farmatsevtychnyi chasopys. 2008;2(6): 11-13. Ukrainian.
[Recent regulation of the industry. Meeting of professional pharmaceutical association]. Ezhenedelnik Apteka. 2010;727(6): 10. Ukrainian.
Pashkov V. [Self-regulation of the pharmaceutical market]. Ezhenedelnik Apteka. 2013;41(912). Ukrainian.
Bocherikova E. [Combining professional help efforts of Pharmacy in Ukraine]. Ezhenedelnik Apteka. 2016;40(1061). Ukrainian.
Susharina IV. [Scientic and methodological approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of NGOs in pharmacy]. Upravlinnia, ekonomika ta zabezpechennia yakosti v farmatsii. 2016;3: 6-74. Ukrainian.
Oliynyk D. [Modern methods of evaluating the performance of government]. The efciency of public administration. 2013;34: 275-283.
CAF Resource Centre of the European Institute of Public Administration, m. Maastricht, Available from: http://www.eipa.eu/en/pages/show/&tid=69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish their materials in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and assign to the journal the right to first publish this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of original work and the first publication of work in this journal
. - Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form they are published by this journal (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
Journal policy allows and encourages publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial review, as it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
