IMPLEMENTATION OF MAIN INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS IN TRAINING OF MEDICAL SPECIALIST
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/me.2414-5998.2018.1.8465Keywords:
interactivity of training, clinical thinking, brainstorming, presentation, discussion.Abstract
The aim of the work – the analysis of the pedagogical effectiveness of the introduction of interactive learning technologies in the training of an internship doctor in the specialty “General Practice - Family Medicine”.
The main body. The article presents the main technologies of interactive learning, which are used at the Department of Family Medicine and Therapy in the training of a medical specialist: brainstorming, discussion, presentation, role play. The features of each of these methods and their advantages were given. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the used pedagogical technologies was carried out at the end of the discipline by testing and the licensed computer program “Elex” (150 questions of 2-3 levels of complexity on the corresponding specialty were offered) and by checking the acquisition of practical skills in accordance with standardized cards of practical skills and summing up the results, anonymous questionnaire.
The effectiveness of using individual interactive teaching methods in the training of a medical specialist is shown.
Conclusions. To achieve maximum mastering of the material, to make the classroom interesting and dynamic, it is necessary to use various interactive teaching methods, in particular: brainstorming, discussion, role play, presentation. For the effective use of one or another interactive method in the training of a specialist, it is important to be familiar with a variety of methods, to understand their features, to take into account the benefits and limitations, and to take into account the recommendations for their use, to apply interactive methods in accordance with the topic, goals and objectives of the occupation.References
Zhdan, V.M., Babanina, M.Yu., & Kitura, Ye.M. (2017). Orhanizatsiia navchannia likariv-interniv na kafedri simeinoi medytsyny i terapii [Organization of teaching interns at the Department of Family Medicine and Therapy]. Medychni perspektyvy – Medical Perspectives, ХХІІ, 2(1), 99-101 [in Ukrainian].
Komar, O.A. (2005). Modernizatsiia suchasnoho navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu [Modernization of the modern educational process]. Zb. naukovykh prats. Chastyna II – Collection of Scientific Works. Part II. Kyiv: Minimum [in Ukrainian].
Liashuk, P.M. (2013). Klinika – vyshcha shkola likarskoi maisternosti [Clinic – the highest school of medical skill]. Novosti meditsyny i farmatsyy – News of Medicine and Pharmacy, 471, 18-20 [in Ukrainian].
Yasko, B.Ya. (2008). Klinicheskoe myshlenie v strukture professionalnogo myshleniya vracha [Clinical thinking in the structure of the professional thinking of a doctor]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie – Human. Community. Control, 4, 8-91 [in Russian].
Sysoieva, S.O. (Ed.), Aleksiuk, A.M., & Volovyk, P.M. (2001). Pedahohichni tekhnolohii u neperervnii profesiinii osviti [Pedagogical technologies in continuous vocational education]. – Kyiv: VIPOL [in Ukrainian].
Pometun, O., & Pyrozhenko, L. (2002). Interaktyvni tekhnolohii navchannia: teoriia, praktyka, dosvid [Interactive learning technologies: theory, practice, experience]. Kyiv: APN [in Ukrainian].
Percival, Е., & Ellington, H.A. (1984). Handbook of Educational Technology. London: N.Y.
Devid Li. (2002). Praktika gruppovogo treninga [The practice of group training]. St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
