METHODS OF ASSESSING STUDENT SUCCESS DURING DISTANCE EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.2.13103

Keywords:

students, assessment, success, distance learning

Abstract

One of the important components of the educational process is the control of students’ knowledge, skills and abilities. Control and assessment in any type of human activity always have a significant impact on its quality and efficiency, on a person’s attitude to the performance of duties, on the development of a sense of responsibility for the state of affairs. The educational process should be organized so that the student strives to master knowledge independently. The student must assess his level of training, independently choose topics and determine the level of knowledge acquisition.

The problem of monitoring and evaluating the results of the didactic process is an actual methodological, theoretical and methodical problem of didactics, many aspects of which remain insufficiently worked out and substantiated, especially in modern conditions of distance learning. During the quarantine restrictions, and now also in the conditions of martial law, the standard methods of assessing the success of students turned out to be not effective enough, so the issue of creating and introducing new means of assessing the acquired knowledge and skills into the educational process became acute.

References

Haluziak, V.M., Smetanskyi, M.I., & Shakhov, V.I. (2001). Pedahohika [Pedagogy]. Vinnytsia: RVV VAT «Vinobldrukarnia» [in Ukrainian].

Zhukovska, A.L. (2005). Problema otsiniuvannia uspishnosti studentiv. Naukovyi poshuk molodykh doslidnykiv [The problem of evaluating students’ success. Scientific search of young researchers]. (vyp. 2) Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian].

Zvarych, I. (2000). Problema udoskonalennia kontroliu i otsinky znan studentiv [The problem of improving control and assessment of students’ knowledge]. Ridna shkola. – Native School, 10, 43-45 [in Ukrainian].

Kulyk, M.S., Luzik, E.V., & Ladohubets, N.V. (2004). Kredytno-modulno-reitynhova systema navchalnoi diialnosti [Credit-module-rating system of educational activity]. Kyiv: Natsionalnyi aviatsiinyi universytet [in Ukrainian].

Kuzminskyi, A.I. (2015). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly. [Pedagogy of high school]. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].

Luzan, P.H. (2003). Metody kontroliu v systemi aktyvizatsii navchannia studentiv [Methods of control in the system of student learning activation]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. – Scientific Bulletin of the National Agrarian University. (vyp. 67) Kyiv: NAU [in Ukrainian].

Bilous, V.T., Horiunova, L.I., Tsymbaliuk, A.V., & Tsymbaliuk, S.Ya. (2001). Osnovy orhanizatsii ta metodyky vykladannia u vyshchii shkoli [Basics of organization and methods of teaching in higher education]. Irpin: Akademiia DPS Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Skliachenko, H. (2021). Dystantsiina osvita pid chas pandemii [Distance education during the pandemic]. Naukovi zapysky. – Рroceedings. 193, 439-445 [in Ukrainian]. DOI 10.36550/2522-4077-2021-1-193-439-444.

Yahupov, V.V. (2002). Pedahohika [Pedagogy]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Means, B., Bakia, M. & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us about Whether, When and How. New York: Routledge, Copyright.

Published

2022-11-02

How to Cite

Dubyna, S. O., Khapchenkova, D. S., Бондаренко, С. В., & Fedorova, I. O. (2022). METHODS OF ASSESSING STUDENT SUCCESS DURING DISTANCE EDUCATION. Medical Education, (2), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.2.13103

Issue

Section

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION