ANTIPLAGIARISM STRATEGY FOR SCIENTIFIC PAPERS EXAMINATION: AUTHOR ALGORITHMS FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPERTISE OF THESES OF REPORTS OF STUDENTS AND YOUNG SCIENTISTS USING ONLINE RESOURCES WITHOUT LOSS OF VALIDITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/me.2414-5998.2018.3.8875Keywords:
plagiarism expertise strategy, author algorithms.Abstract
The aim of the work – оptimization of the strategy of the primary technical antiplagiarism examination of small-scale publications – scientific works (theses, reports at the conference of students and young scientists) with an increase in the speed of technical inspection without losing the quality of its implementation by introducing anti-plagiaristic expertise of scientific works with one-step verification of several abstract reports without loss of validity with the use of available desktop programs and Internet resources.
The main body. The authors analyze the advantages and disadvantages of software plagiarism examination of scientific works used at the Danylo Halytskyi Lviv National Medical University. Two algorithms for optimizing the speed of implementation of the primary technical plagiarism verification of short student research papers are proposed and implemented without losing the quality of its implementation by successive and one-time application of the software programs “Advego Plagiatus”, “Etxt Antiplagiat” (“AntiPlagiarism.NET”) and Internet resources “Content Watch” and “Вe1Ru”. According to the first algorithm, 480 theses of reports of students and young scientists submitted for participation in the scientific conference in 2018 of Danylo Halytskyi Lviv National Medical University. 32 works (12.8 %) were rejected due to the academic plagiarism. The first proposed algorithm allows you to save up to 75 % of the cost of effective time without losing the effectiveness of anti-plagiarized primary technical expertise of theses of reports. Other algorithm carried out random inspection of 150 theses of reports of student scientific conference at Danylo Halytskyi Lviv National Medical University. As a result of academic plagiarism, 7 theses of reports were rejected (4.7%). The second proposed algorithm allows you to save 81.11 % – 85.71% of the cost of effective time without losing the effectiveness of anti-plagiarized primary technical expertise of theses of reports.
Conclusions. According to the antiplagiarism examination and the Strategy for Promoting Academic Integrity, we proposed and implemented two algorithms for optimizing the speed of implementation of the primary technical anti-plagiarized verification of short student research papers without losing the quality of its implementation by successive and one-time application of the “Advevego Plagiatus”, “Etxt Antiplagiat” (“AntiPlagiarism.NET”) and Internet resources “Content Watch” and “Вe1Ru”. Some variants of optimization of examination with one-stage check of several scientific works of students and young scientists with the use of antiplagiarism Internet resources for application in scientific departments of higher educational establishments, departments of information of scientific libraries and structural departments of research institutes and other educational institutions are presented, which allows to realize saving 75 % – 85.71 % of the cost of effective time without loss of expert validity.
References
Artamonov, E.B. (2012). Analiz metodiv protydii avtomatychnoho systemnoho vyznachennia plahiatu v elektronnykh dokumentakh [Analysis of methods of counteraction to automatic systems of determination of plagiarism in electronic documents]. Problemy informatyzatsii ta upravlinna – Problems of Informatization and Management, 4 (40), 12-18 [in Ukrainian].
Voronkin, O.S. (2013). Avtomatyzovanyi tekstolohichnyi analiz: vykorystannia detektoriv internet-plahiatu v akademichnomu sektori [Automated textual analysis: the use of online plagiarized detectors in the academic sector]. Foss Lviv, 39-41 [in Ukrainian].
Vprovadzhennia systemy antyplahiatu v ChNU, elektronnyi resurs [Implementation of antiplagiarism system in ChNU, online resource]. Naukova biblioteka Chernivetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Yu. Fedkovycha – Scientific Library named after Yu. Fedkovych of Chernivtsi National University. – Retrieved from: URL.http://www.library.chnu.edu.ua/index.php?page=ua/archive&data[5008][news_id]=6209 [in Ukrainian].
Hryhorenko, A. (2012). Zbyrannia dokazovoi bazy pry porushenni prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti v merezhi Internet [Evidence base collection of violation of intellectual property rights in the Internet]. Intelektualna vlasnist – Intellectual Property, 7, 10-12 [in Ukrainian].
(2007). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava” [Law of Ukraine “On Copyright and Related Rights”] Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy pro okhoronu intelektualnoi vlasnosti [The Law of Ukraine on Intellectual Property Protection]. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Kyiv. Parlamentske vydavnytstvo – Kyiv. Parliamentary Publishing House. – Retrieved from: http://www.intellect.ua/ukr/copyright/law/laws/copyright [in Ukrainian].
Kovaliova, A. (2014). Problemy akademichnoho plahiatu ta avtorskoho prava [Problems of academic plagiarism and law of copyright]. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny – Special Historical Disciplines, 21, 61-71 [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: stanom na 20. 05. 2012. [The Criminal Code of Ukraine. 20. 05. 2012]. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Kyiv. Parlamentske vydavnytstvo – Kyiv. Parliamentary Publishing House. – Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14/ed20120520 [in Ukrainian].
Stukalo, N.V., Kovalchuk, K.V., & Lytvyn, M.V. (2013). Plahiat u studentskykh robotakh: metody vyiavlennia ta zapobihannia: metodychnyi posibnyk [Plagiarism in student work: methods of detection and prevention: methodical manual]. Dnipropetrovsk: O. Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University [in Ukrainian].
(2016). Prohramne zabezpechennia dlia perevirky naukovykh tekstiv na plahiat: informatsiinyi ohliad [Software for verification of scientific texts on plagiarism: information review]. Authors-compilers: Verhun, A.R., Savenkova, L.V., Chukanova, S.O. Editorial Board:Pashkova, V.S., Voskoboinikova-Huzeva, O., Soshynska, Ya.E. Kyiv: Ukrainian Library Association. CD-ROM, ISBN 978-966-97569-5-4 [in Ukrainian].
Romanova, I.V. (2014). Yavyshche plahiatu: istoriia ta siohodennia [The phenomen of plagiarism: history and present]. – Retrieved from: http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua [in Ukrainian].
Kharytonova, O.I. (2012). Do vyznachennia systemy porushen prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti [To the definition of the system of intellectual property rights violations]. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii profesorsko-vykladatskoho skladu – Legal Life of Modern Ukraine: Materials of the International Teaching Scientific Conference. Odesa: Phoenix [in Ukrainian].
Khobzei, M.K., Verhun, A.R., Kit, Z.M., & Yahelo, S.P. (2017). Osoblyvosti perevirky naukovykh ta navchalno-metodychnykh prats u medychnomu universyteti: antyplahiatna ekspertyza [Features of scientific and teaching-methodical works examination at medical university: antiplagiarism expertise]. Suchasni pidkhody do vyshchoi medychnoi osvity v Ukraini (z dystantsiinym pidiednanniam VM(F)NZ Ukrainy za dopomohoiu videokonferents-zviazku): materialy XIV Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. z mizhnar. uchastiu, prysviachenoi 60-richchiu TDMU – Modern Approaches to Higher Medical Education in Ukraine (with remote connection of VM(F)NZ of Ukraine with the help of videoconferencing): materials of XIV All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference with international participation devoted to the 60th of TDMU. Ternopil: TDMU [in Ukrainian].
Khobzei, M.K., Verhun A.R., & Sichkoris, O.Ye. (2017). Perevirka naukovykh prats na naiavnist akademichnoho plahiatu u medychnomu universyteti: osnovni avtorski napratsiuvannia ta analiz pivtorarichnoho dosvidu funktsionuvannia ekspertyzy [Verification of scientific works for the presence of academic plagiarism at the medical university: the main author’s work and analysis of a half year experience of the examination]. Pivdennoukrainskyi medychnyi naukovyi zhurnal – South Ukrainian Medical Journal, 16, 30-36 [in Ukrainian].
Chopiak, V.V., Nadraha, O.B., & Verhun, A.R. (2016). Tekhnichna ekspertyza naukovykh prats na naiavnist akademichnoho plahiatu (metodychni vkazivky) [Technical examination of scientific works on the presence of academic plagiarism. Methodical instructions]. Lviv: LNMU [in Ukrainian].
Academic Plagiarism. – Retrieved from: http://www.academicplagiarism.com/.
Authors’ Rights // Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. – Retrieved from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors’rights.
Harris, R. Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. – Retrieved from: http://advego-pro.ru/advego-plagiatus.html.
Biliæ-Zulle, L., Frkoviæ, V., & Turk, T. (2005). Prevalence of plagiarism medical students. Croat Med. J., 46 (1), 126-131.
Retrieved from: https://www.etxt.ru/antiplagiat/.
Retrieved from: https://advego.com/blog/read/news/3215142/all1/.
Retrieved from: http://www.anyaplanet.net/inet/AdvegoPlagiatus.html.
Retrieved from: https://be1.ru/antiplagiat-online/.
Retrieved from: https://content-watch.ru/text.
Retrieved from: http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm.
