DIAGNOSTICS OF THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FUTURE DOCTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2023.3.14271Keywords:
future doctors, responsibility, values, professional ethics, medical deontology, motivation, self-developmentAbstract
The article presents the results of a study of the professional responsibility of future medical students. The professional responsibility of the future doctor is a personal and professional quality of a specialist in the medical field, which arises on the basis of knowledge about the norms and rules of professional activity on the basis of professional ethics, is manifested in a conscientious attitude to the performance of professional functions, in a conscious acceptance of the values of the profession, in experiencing a sense of guilt for improper performance of production functions and the ability to mobilize efforts to preserve the life and health of patients. In the structure of professional responsibility, we distinguish cognitive, motivational, value, and activity components.
The cognitive component is revealed through such criteria and indicators as awareness of the norms of a doctor’s professional ethics, knowledge of the basics of medical deontology, the ability to analyze the causes and consequences of one’s own actions, awareness of the need to act in accordance with job instructions and professional requirements, satisfaction with the choice of a doctor’s profession; awareness of responsibility for one's actions in front of patients, their relatives, colleagues, society. The motivational and value component of professional responsibility reflects the presence of moral and ethical positions of the future doctor, a positive personal attitude to the moral and ethical norms of medical activity, orientation to the values of humanism, the preservation of the health and life of each person, internal motivation to comply with the principles and norms of medical deontology, striving for success in patient treatment, self-development in the profession. The active component of the professional responsibility of the future doctor is manifested in the formation of practical skills to establish socially acceptable relationships with patients and colleagues based on the principles of medical deontology, in the ability to self-control responsible actions and voluntarily stop actions that contradict the norms of professional ethics.
The results of the diagnosis of the professional responsibility of future doctors – students of the 3rd – 5th year of medical higher educational institutions revealed a low level of formation of the motivational-value and activity components of the studied quality, which gives reason to talk about the need for special work on the development of responsibility at the stage of professional training. An essential role in the development of the professional responsibility of future doctors should be assigned to the participation of students in research work, public activities, involvement in volunteer activities, charitable actions and events based on health care institutions.
References
Hrevtsova, R. (2007). Pravovi pytannia vidnosyn mizh likarem i patsiientom [Legal questions of relations are between a doctor and patient]. Therapia. Ukrainskyi medychnyi visnyk – Therapia. Ukrainian medical announcer, 7-8, 77 [in Ukrainian].
Huz, V. (2013). Vidpovidalne stavlennia maibutnikh fakhivtsiv do profesiinoho navchannia yak chynnyk harmonizatsii osvitnoho prostoru [Responsible attitude of future specialists toward professional studies as a factor of harmonization of educational space]. Problemy suchasnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Pedahohika i psykholohiia – Problems of modern pedagogical education. Pedagogics and psychology, 40(1), 84-89 [in Ukrainian].
Deklaratsiia vidpovidalnosti Liudyny [Declaration of responsibility of Human]. Retrieved from: https://bhfamily.org/deklaratsiya-obovyazkiv-lyudyny/ [in Ukrainian].
Demkova, D. (2014). Fenomen vidpovidalnosti yak obiekt psykholohichnoho analizu [Phenomenon of responsibility as object of psychological analysis]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia «Psykholohiia» – The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. A Series of “Psychologyˮ, 56(1121), 18-22 [in Ukrainian].
Kakhno, I. (2015). Osobystisne stanovlennia maibutnoho likaria v umovakh vyshchoho navchalnoho medychnoho zakladu [The personality becoming of future doctor is in the conditions of higher educational medical establishment]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of Research Papers “Problems of Modern Psychologyˮ, 30, 257-267 [in Ukrainian].
Kuzminskyi, P. (2011). Vidpovidalnist u medychnii diialnosti (za materialamy literaturnykh dzherel) [Responsibility in Medical Practice (based on the literature)]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia to rozvytok – Public administration: improvement and development, 10. Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=364 [in Ukrainian].
Lypka, A. (2019). Vidpovidalnist osobystosti v kontekstakh zhyttievoho shliakhu i sotsialnoho povsiakdennia: psykholohichnyi aspekt [Personal responsibility in the contexts of life path and social everyday life: psychological aspect]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 74-82 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.01.074
Manuilov, Y. (2011). Filosofskyi analiz problemy profesiinoi vidpovidalnosti [Philosophical Analysis of the Problem of Professional Responsibility]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho». Seriia «Filosofiia, filosofiiaprava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia» – The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series “Philosophy, philosophyoflaw, politicalscience, sociologyˮ, 8, 11-19 [in Ukrainian].
Podufalova, K. (2023). Formuvannia vidpovidalnoho stavlennia do pedahohichnoi diialnosti u studentiv pedahohichnoho koledzhu [The formation of a responsible attitude to pedagogical activity among the students of the pedagogical college]. Doctorʼs thesis. Vinnytsia: VSPU [in Ukrainian].
Pavlenkova, O., Kaskova, L., Amosova, L., Ulasevich, L., & Zelenska, V. (2023). Rol vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly u formuvanni svidomosti maibutnoho likaria [The role of a higher education teacher in shaping the consciousness of a future doctor]. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk Ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatolohichnoi akademii – Actual Problems of the Modern Medicine: Bulletin of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2, 104-106 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.23.2.2.104
Sviecharevska, V. (2012). Vidpovidalnist yak predmet psykholohichnoho piznannia [Responsibility as a subject of psychological cognition]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1(47), 93-99 [in Ukrainian].
Seniuta, I. (2007). Medychne pravo: pravo liudyny na okhoronu zdorovia [Medical law: the human right to health care]. Lviv: Astroliabiia [in Ukrainian].
Smetanskyi, M. (1994). Profesiina vidpovidalnist yak rysa osobystosti [Professional responsibility as a personality trait]. Ridna shkola – Native school, 1-2, 68-69 [in Ukrainian].
Titarenko, O. (2008). Istoriia rozvytku katehorii vidpovidalnist u sotsialnii filosofii [The History of the Development of the Category of Responsibility in Social Philosophy]. Humanitarnyi chasopys – Humanitarian Journal, 2, 122-129 [in Ukrainian].
Levy, N. (2016). Addiction, autonomy and informed consent: On and of the garden path. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 41, 56-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv033
McCullough, L.B. (1998). John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-27162-0
Nys, T. (2016). Autonomy, trust, and respect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 41, 10-24.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Rotter, J.B. (1973). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall NewYork: Johnson Reprint Corp.
Whitney, S.N., & McCullough, L.B. (2007). Physicians’ silent decisions: Because patient autonomy does not always come first. American Journal of Bioethics, 7, 33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160701399735
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Medical Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.