PHILOSOPHY AS AN EDUCATIONAL DISCIPLINE IN THE CONDITIONS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION: FEATURES OF TEACHING AND STUDYING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.3.13403

Keywords:

philosophy, methodological principles, applicants, educational discipline

Abstract

With the existence of many common, common points in the teaching and learning of each academic discipline, which have a pronounced methodical character (sequence of consideration of the material, availability of the necessary literature, taking into account the characteristics of the audience, etc.), there are provisions that directly relate to the specifics of the form of knowledge offered to students for mastering. It is about the methodological principles of organizing the educational process in the context of a specific educational course — history of Ukraine and Ukrainian culture, sociology, philosophy, etc. The issue is fundamentally important, and not only the methodical side of education, but also its results depend to a great extent on how it will be resolved. As for philosophy, the matter is not entirely simple. This is a very specific formation, distinguished by a number of features that are absent in other forms of spiritual culture. Taking them into account is a necessary condition for the effective disclosure of the discipline’s potential. In the mode of distance learning, when there is no direct, direct communication between teachers and learners, it is necessary to correctly determine which features of philosophy should be given priority, and which will have a secondary sound.

References

Panasenko, E. (2011). Eksperyment u systemi metodiv naukovoho doslidzhennia v istorykopedahohichnij dumtsi radianskoi doby [Experiment in the system of methods of scientific research in the historical and pedagogical thought of the Soviet era]. Vytoky Pedahohichnoi Majsternosti. Zbirnyk Naukovykh Prats – Origins of pedagogical mastery: Coll. of science works. Poltava [in Ukrainian].

Hessler, R., Hollis, S., & Crowe, C. (2007). Peer mediation: A qualitative study of youthful frames of power and influence. Mediation Quarterly, 15(3), 187-198.

Kuntuova, I., Mazhidenova, R., & Mendybayev, S. (2014). Methods of Teaching Philosophy in Technical Higher Educational Institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 898-906. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1247.

Kimmel, M.S. (2000). The Gendered society. State University of New York at Stony Brook. New York: Oxford University press.

Laundon, M., Cathcart, A., & Greer, D. (2020). Teaching Philosophy Statements. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 577-587.

Lowton-Smith, S., Morgan, R., Stanley, M., Hames, T., Smith, P., Lawson, C., & Leddington-Wright, S. (2019). Peer-to-peer teaching: Experience of 3rd year undergraduate sports therapy students and impact upon applied academic performance. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100196. DOI 10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.04.002.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Bondarenko, S. V., Pylypyshyn, O. I., & Humenna, N. V. (2022). PHILOSOPHY AS AN EDUCATIONAL DISCIPLINE IN THE CONDITIONS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION: FEATURES OF TEACHING AND STUDYING. Medical Education, (3), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.3.13403

Issue

Section

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION