EVALUATION OF MODERN FORMS OF LECTURES BY FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.1.12830Keywords:
modern lectures, medical university, student questionnaireAbstract
The article considers the expediency of lectures as a type of training based on the results of student surveys, as well as the disadvantages and advantages of traditional and interactive lectures formats. Based on a survey of students to determine their need for lectures and compare traditional and interactive lectures on the basis of: usefulness, overcoming monotony, maintaining attention and interest, a positive role in learning and motivation for self-study. The study was conducted by questioning 75 medical faculty first-year students majoring in “Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy” aged 17 to 20 years. The questions of the questionnaire were formulated by the authors of the article with the help of the researched scientific and methodical literature, which studies the problems of organizing lectures in higher educational institutions. According to the results of student surveys, 77.4 % of respondents need lectures, primarily to gain professional knowledge and prepare for practical classes. Modern forms of lecture – traditional and interactive – are of almost equal interest to about 50 % of freshmen. The interactive lecture was rated by students significantly higher than the traditional one in terms of retention of attention (64.5 % and 33.9 %, respectively) and deprivation of monotony (78.5 % vs. 19.4 %). To a lesser extent, both lecture formats differed for students in terms of improved learning and self-study. When conducting an interactive lecture, first-year students have certain problems of interaction with the lecturer – only 40.3 % positively assessed the possibility of the teacher to address them during the lesson and only 29 % are free to contact themselves when questions arise, which we associate with incomplete adaptation process to study at the university and in the new team. The results of the study showed that the lecture remains a type of study that students need, and their effectiveness can be increased by using an interactive format.
References
Machynska, N.I., & Stelmakh, S.S. (2012). Suchasni formy orhanizatsii navchalnoho protsesu u vyshchiishkoli [Modern forms of organization of the initial process in every school]. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrish¬nikh sprav. Retrieved from: https://pedagogy.lnu.edu.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Tsvirenko, S.M., Pokhylko, V.I., Cherniavska, Yu.I., & Zhuk, L.A. (2021). Mistse lektsii v suchasnii vyshchii medychnii osviti [The field of lectures in modern medical edu¬cation]. Ukrainska medychna stomatolohichna akademiia – Ukrainian Medical Dental Academy, 278-279. Retrieved from: http://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Zakon Ukrainy Pro vyshchu osvitu vid 01.07.2014 r. № 1556-18 VR (v redaktsii vid 04.08.2015 r.) [Law of Ukraine On higher education dated 01.07.2014 No. 1556-VII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Sholoiko, N.V. (2015). Rol lektsii u navchalnomu protsesi dystsypliny «Orhanizatsiia ta ekonomika farmatsii» u systemi novitnikh tsilei vyshchoi farmatsevtychnoi osvity [The role of lecture in the educational process of discipline “organization and economics of pharmacy” in the system of new goals of higher pharmaceutical education]. Medychna osvita – Medical Education, 4, 64-67. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mosv_2015_4_20 [in Ukrainian].
Alaagib, N.A., Musa, O.A., & Saeed, A.M. (2019). Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan. BMC Med. Educ., 19, 365. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1799-0.
Padugupati, S., Joshi, K., Yamini, D., Chary, R.S., & Sarma, D. (2017). Educational outcomes of small group discussion versus traditional lecture among first year under¬graduate medical students. J. Educ. Technol. Health Sci., 4(3), 93-96. Retrieved from: https://www.ipinnovative.com/journals/JETHS/article.
Nawabi, S., Shaikh, S.S., Javed, M.Q., & Riaz, A. (2020). Faculty’s perception of their role as a medical teacher at qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Cureus, 12(7). Retrieved from: https://scholar.google.com/. DOI 10.7759/cureus.9095.
Gazi, E.A., & Laskar, M.S. (2014). Art of lecture in medical education. Bangladesh Medical Journal Khulna, 46(1-2), 24-27. DOI https://doi.org/10.3329/bmjk.v46i1-2.18236.
Gutierrez, C.M., Cox, S.M., & Dalrymple, J.L. (2016). The Revolution in Medical Education. Texas medicine, 112(2), 58-61. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26859376/.
Harden, R.M., & Lilley, P. (2018). The eight roles of the medical teacher: The purpose and function of a teacher in the healthcare professions. Elsevier Health Sciences, eBook ISBN: 9780702068942. Retrieved from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/.
Verma, A., Patyal, A., Meena, J.K., Mathur, M., & Mathur, N. (2021). Interactive teaching in medical education: Experiences and barriers. Adesh University Journal of Medical Sciences & Research., 3(2), 69-73. DOI 10.25259 /AUJMSR_13_2021.
Wolff, M., Wagner, M. J., Poznanski, S., Schiller, J., & Santen, S. (2015). Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 48(1), 85-93. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25440868/.
Predrag, V. (2016). Improving teaching skills: from interactive classroom to applicable knowledge. Adv. Physiol. Educ., 40, 1-4. DOI https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00139.2015.
Toohey, S.L., Wray, A., Wiechmann, W., Lin, M., & Boysen-Osborn, M. (2016). Ten Tips for Engaging the Millennial Learner and Moving an Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum into the 21st Century. West. J. Emerg. Med., 17(3), 337-343. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27330668/.
Roopa, S., Geetha, M.B., Rani, A., & Chacko, T. (2013). What type of lectures students want?-a reaction evaluation of dental students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(10), 2244-2246. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24298487/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Medical Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.