Analysis of the methods of evaluation and influence of polishing of composite materials on the functional forecast of restorations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2018.1.8392Keywords:
roughness, polishing, composite restoration.Abstract
Summary. Among the proposed USPHS criteria approved by FDI, the level of gloss and polishing of restorations plays a key role in preventing not only such complications as disocorporations or changes in their texture in the future, but also preventing secondary caries and sealing disintegration, since areas with high roughness play the role of retention points for the accumulation of bacterial plaque and the further progression of the above-described complications.
The aim of the study – to analyze the methods for assessing the quality of polishing composite restorations and to determine the role of influence roughness factor of their surface on the prediction of their functioning and change of color stability parameters, formation of biofilm and shine.
Materials and Methods. Search of publications related to the topic of this analysis was conducted by the Google Scholar search engine by the keywords "roughness", "polishing", "composite restorations" and their analogues in English. The depth of search, taking into account the age of key articles, determined by the level of their citation in later periodicals, did not exceed 15 years. In order to organize the received data, Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Office) table editor was used to group pre-selected articles based on the results of the provided content analysis.
Results and Discussion. In the course of the analysis, it was established that the basic laboratory methods for assessing the roughness of the restoration surface, as an indicator of the quality of polishing, are atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and profilometry. Most often, in order to verify the aforementioned parameter in the analyzed studies, the Ra value of mean arithmetic deviation of the profile was used, on the basis of which analysis it was possible to determine the dependence of the possibilities for achieving the corresponding level of restoration polishing on the structure of the composite material used, the system and phases of polishing, and the tribological nature of the interaction of the polishing system and the surface of the restoration.
Conclusions. The results of the analysis show that the data obtained in the course of previous clinical and laboratory studies dedicated to the effect of polishing on various restoration parameters are debatable and a more specific systematization is required, with the selection of the investigated aspects of brightness, roughness, color stability and functional prediction changes due to the polishing method in separate independent subjects for research, with further phased combination of them after obtaining unambiguous numerical data, subjected to appropriate objective interpretation.
References
Makieiev, V.F., Hotra, Z.Yu., Mykyievych, N.I., & Chuchmai, I.H. (2012). Porivnialna otsinka poverkhnevoi shorstkosti ta mikrostruktury riznykh mikrohibrydnykh fotopolimernykh kompozytnykh materialiv zalezhno vid sposobu yikh polimeryzatsii [Comparative estimation of surface roughness and microstructure of various microhybrid photopolymer composite materials depending on the method of their polymerization]. Novyny stomatolohii – News of Dentistry, 2, 84-89 [in Ukrainian].
Udod, O.A., & Cheliakh, O.M. (2014). Novitni pidkhody do otsinky yakosti finishnoi obrobky restavratsii frontalnykh zubiv [New approaches to the assessment of the quality of the finishing treatment of restorations of frontal teeth]. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny – Journal of Problems of biology and Medicine, 2 (2), 193-195 [in Ukrainian].
Peyton, J.H. (2004). Finishing and polishing techniques: direct composite resin restorations. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 16 (4), 293-298.
Morgan, M. (2004). Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 16 (3), 211-234.
Gönülol, N., & Yılmaz, F. (2012). The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. Journal of Dentistry, 40, e64-e70.
Jones, C.S., Billington, R.W., & Pearson, G.J. (2006). Interoperator variability during polishing. Quintessence International, 37 (3).
Jefferies, S.R. (2007). Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dental Clinics of North America, 51 (2), 379-397.
Mopper, K. W. (2013). Finishing and polishing. Using the best tool to achieve natural-looking results. Inside Dent., 9, 90-92.
Sirenko, H.O., & Soltys, L.M. (2010). Modeli nanometrychnoi ta mikrometrychnoi shorstkosti poverkhni tverdykh til (Ohliad) [Models of nanometric and micrometric roughness of the surface of solids (Overview)]. Fizyka i khimiia tverdoho tila – Physics and Chemistry of a Solid, 11 (2), 423-446 [in Ukrainian].
Sirenko, H.O., & Soltys, L.M. (2014). Vlastyvosti polimernoho kompozytu pid chas tertia ta znoshuvannia po izotropnii ta anizotropnii shorstkii poverkhni tverdoho tila [Properties of a polymer composite during friction and wear on an isotropic and anisotropic rough surface of a solid]. Matematychni metody v khimii i biolohii – Mathematical Methods in Chemistry and Biology, 2 (1), 105-126.
Marigo, L., Rizzi, M., La Torre, G., & Rumi, G. (2001). 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Operative Dentistry, 26 (6), 562-568.
Özgünaltay, G., Yazici, A. R., & Görücü, J. (2003). Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30 (2), 218-224.
Yazici, A. R., Müftü, A., & Kugel, G. (2007). Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract., 8 (5), 1-11.
Pettini, F., Corsalini, M., Savino, M. G., Stefanachi, G., Di Venere, D., Pappalettere, C., & Boccaccio, A. (2015). Roughness analysis on composite materials (microfilled, nanofilled and silorane) after different finishing and polishing procedures. The Open Dentistry Journal, 9, 357.
Nair, V.S., Sainudeen, S., Padmanabhan, P., Vijayashankar, L.V., Sujathan, U., & Pillai, R. (2016). Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 19 (1), 91.
Giacomelli, L., Derchi, G., Frustaci, A., Bruno, O., Covani, U., Barone, A., & Chiappelli, F. (2010). Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy. The Open Dentistry Journal, 4, 191.
Say, E.C., Yurdaguven, H., Yaman, B.C., & ÖZER, F. (2014). Surface roughness and morphology of resin composites polished with two-step polishing systems. Dental Materials Journal, 33 (3), 332-342.
Zemskov, Yu.P., Afanasyev, A.A., Pegina, A.N., & Lesnikov, R.V. (2015). K voprosu o primenenii metodiky kontrolya sherokhovatosti shlifovannoy zubnoy poverkhnosti [To the question of applying a roughness control technique to a grinding tooth surface]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Meditsyna. Farmatsyya – Scientific Reports of Belgorod State University. Series: Medicine. Pharmacy, 30 (10), 207 [in Russian].
Kavchuk, O.M., Garanina, T.S., & Krasnyuk, I.P. (2012). Otsinka efektyvnosti klinichnoho zastosuvannia hibrydnoho restavratsiinoho materialu spectrum (TPH 3) [Evaluating the effectiveness of the clinical use of spectrum hybrid restoration material (TPH 3)]. Bukovynskyi medychnyi visnyk – Bukovyna Medical Journal, 16 (4), 81 [in Ukrainian].
Udod, O.A., & Cheliakh, O.M. (2013). Klinichna otsinka yakosti poverkhni frontalnykh restavratsii zubiv [Clinical assessment of the surface quality of frontal restoration of teeth]. Pytannia eksperymentalnoi ta klinichnoi medytsyny – Issues of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 17 (1), 333-338.
Udod, O.A., & Cheliakh, O.M. (2014). Novitni pidkhody do otsinky yakosti finishnoi obrobky restavratsii frontalnykh zubiv [New approaches to the assessment of the quality of the finishing treatment of restorations of frontal teeth]. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny – Journal of Biology and Medicine Problems, 2 (2), 193-195.
Yazici, A. R., Tuncer, D., Antonson, S., Onen, A., & Kilinc, E. (2010). Effects of delayed finishing/polishing on surface roughness, hardness and gloss of tooth-coloured restorative materials. European Journal of Dentistry, 4 (1), 50-56.
Venturini, D., Cenci, M.S., Demarco, F. F., Camacho, G. B., & Powers, J. M. (2006). Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry, 31(1), 11-17.
Cazzaniga, G., Ottobelli, M., Ionescu, A. C., Paolone, G., Gherlone, E., Ferracane, J. L., & Brambilla, E. (2017). In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of dentistry, 67, 43-52.
Glauser, S., Astasov‐Frauenhoffer, M., Müller, J. A., Fischer, J., Waltimo, T., & Rohr, N. (2017). Bacterial colonization of resin composite cements: influence of material composition and surface roughness. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 125(4), 294-302.
Marghalani, H. Y. (2010). Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 22 (2), 127-138.
Ereifej, N.S., Oweis, Y.G., & Eliades, G. (2012). The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Operative Dentistry, 38 (1), E9-E20.
Erdemir, U., Sancakli, H. S., & Yildiz, E. (2012). The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. European Journal of Dentistry, 6 (2), 198-205.
Costa, J.D., Ferracane, J., Paravina, R.D., Mazur, R.F., & Roeder, L. (2007). The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19 (4), 214-224.
Berger, S.B., Palialol, A.R.M., Cavalli, V., & Giannini, M. (2011). Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 23 (1), 34-43.
Senawongse, P., & Pongprueksa, P. (2007). Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19 (5), 265-273.
Antonson, S.A., Yazici, A.R., Kilinc, E., Antonson, D.E., & Hardigan, P.C. (2011). Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. Journal of Dentistry, 39, e9-e17.
Kaizer, M. R., de Oliveira-Ogliari, A., Cenci, M. S., Opdam, N. J., & Moraes, R. R. (2014). Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dental Materials, 30 (4), e41-e78.
