CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS, CD 138 AND REPEATED IMPLANTATION FAILURES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2025.2.15791

Keywords:

office hysteroscopy, CD 138, chronic endometritis, minor gynecological surgery

Abstract

The aim of the study – to evaluate the correlation between visual signs of chronic endometritis (CE) during office hysteroscopy and CD 138 in the diagnosis of CE.

Materials and Methods. A prospective study was conducted from 2021 to 2023 at the “Damiya” Reproductive Health Center, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. Office hysteroscopy was performed as a routine procedure at the stage of endometrial preparation for embryo cryotransfer. Photo- and video-recording of hysteroscopy was performed. Endometrial samples were stored for 24 hours in neutral buffered formalin and then embedded in paraffin according to standard procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).

Results and Discussion. The mean age of the patients was 32.5±1.2 years, 94 (47 %) patients with primary and 106 (53 %) with secondary infertility. According to hysteroscopy, histological and immunohistochemical analysis, 90 patients were diagnosed with HE. 50 patients were diagnosed with HE using visual criteria. These patients were divided into two groups depending on the severity of visual signs: Group I (25 patients) with pronounced signs and Group II (25 patients) with minimal or no signs. In Group I, we included patients with three or more visual signs of HE (focal or diffuse micropolyps with a vascular axis, stromal edema, hyperemia with a large number of white spots and blood vessels on the surface – «strawberry sign», as well as focal and diffuse hyperemia of the endometrium). In group II, we included patients only with criteria such as local isolated micropolyps or isolated focal hyperemia. In the group of women with pronounced visual signs of chronic endometritis, CD 138 was positive in 92 % of patients, while in the group II with weak visual signs of chronic endometritis, CD 138 was negative in 60 % of patients. Comparison of CD 138 indices between the groups of patients with pronounced and almost absent signs of CE demonstrates a clear statistically significant correlation (p<0.05) between the severity of visual signs of chronic endometritis and the CD 138 index. Integration of hysteroscopic findings with histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis (e.g., CD 138 staining) may improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes. Our results demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between the severity of hysteroscopic visual signs and CD 138, suggesting that office hysteroscopy may serve as a reliable preliminary diagnostic tool for HE.

Conclusions. Office hysteroscopy is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of HE, offering a minimally invasive and cost-effective method of evaluating the uterine cavity. Our study demonstrates a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the severity of visual signs observed during hysteroscopy and CD 138, reinforcing the diagnostic value of hysteroscopic criteria for HE. Based on our results, the presence of three out of five of these visual features is sufficient to establish a hysteroscopic diagnosis of HE.

Author Biographies

A. V. Boychuk, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

doctor of medical sciences, professor, head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

N. V. Kotsabyn, Medical Center for Reproductive Health “Damiya”

Doctor of Philosophy

O. M. Yakymchuk, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

Doctor of Philosophy, assistant professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Yu. B. Yakymchuk, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

Doctor of Philosophy, assistant of the Department of Therapy and Family Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

References

Bayer-Garner, I.B., Nickell, J.A., & Korourian, S. (2004). Routine Syndecan-1 immunohistochemistry aids in the diagnosis of CE. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 128. 1000–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/2004-128-1000-RSIAIT

Cicinelli, E., De Ziegler, D., Nicoletti, R., Tinelli, R., Saliani, N., Resta, L., et al. (2009). Poor reliability of vaginal and endocervical cultures for evaluating microbiology of endometrial cavity in women with CE. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 68. 108–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000223819

Cicinelli, E., Matteo, M., Trojano, G., Mitola, P.C., Tinelli, R., Vitagliano, A., et al. (2018). CE in patients with unexplained infertility: prevalence and effects of antibiotic treatment on spontaneous conception. Am J Reprod Immunol, 79. e12838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12782

Cicinelli, E., Vitagliano, A., Kumar, A., Bassil, R., Lasmar, C., Bettocchi, S. et al. (2019). Unified diagnostic criteria for CE at fluid hysteroscopy: proposal and reliability evaluation through an international randomized-controlled observer study. Fertil Steril, 112. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.004

Hirata, K., Kimura, F., Nakamura, A., Kitazawa, J., Morimune, A., Hanada, T., et al. (2021). Histological diagnostic criterion for CE based on the clinical outcome. BMC Womens Health, 21. 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01239-y

Huang W., Liu, B., He, Y., Xie, Y., Liang, T., Bi, Y. et al. (2020). Variation of diagnostic criteria in women with CE and its effect on reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Immunol, 140. 103146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2020.103146

Johnston-MacAnanny, E.B., Hartnett, J., Engmann, L.L., Nulsen, J.C., Sanders, M.M., & Benadiva, C.A. (2010). CE is a frequent finding in women with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 93. 437–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.131

Kamiyama, S., Teruya, Y., Nohara, M., & Kanazawa, K. (2004). Impact of detection of bacterial endotoxin in menstrual effluent on the pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril, 82. 788–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.054

Kitaya, K., Takeuchi, T., Mizuta, S., Matsubayashi, H., & Ishikawa, T. (2018). Endometritis: new time, new concepts. Fertil Steril, 110. 344–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.012

McQueen, D.B., Bernardi, L.A., & Stephenson, M.D. (2014). CE in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril, 101. 1026–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.031

Park, H.J., Kim, Y.S., Yoon, T.K., & Lee, W.S. (2016). CE and infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med, 43. 185–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.4.185

Song, D., Feng, X., Zhang, Q., Xia, E., Xiao, Y., Xie, W., et al. (2018). Prevalence and confounders of CE in premenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online, 36. 78–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.09.008

Tsonis, O., Gkrozou, F., Dimitriou, E., Barmpala, Z., Tsonis, K., Vatopoulou, A. et al. (2023). Hysteroscopic features suggestive of CE: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online, 52. 124–31.

Vitagliano, A., Noventa, M., & Gizzo, S. (2017). Autoimmunity, systemic inflammation, and their correlation with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage: is CE the missing piece of the jigsaw? Am J Reprod Immunol, 77. e12631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12597

Vitagliano, A., Saccardi, C., Litta, P.S., & Noventa, M. (2017). CE: really so relevant in repeated IVF failure? Am J Reprod Immunol, 78. e12741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12758

Vitagliano, A., Saccardi, C., Noventa, M., di Spiezio Sardo, A., Saccone, G., Cicinelli, E. et al. (2018). Effects of CE therapy on in vitro fertilization outcome in women with repeated implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril, 110. 103–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.017

Frattarelli, J.L., McWilliams, G.D., Hill, M.J., Miller, K.A., & Scott Jr, R.T., (2008). Low-dose aspirin use does not improve in vitro fertilization outcomes in poor responders. Fertil Steril., 89(5). 1113–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.007

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Boychuk, A. V., Kotsabyn, N. V., Yakymchuk, O. M., & Yakymchuk, Y. B. (2025). CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS, CD 138 AND REPEATED IMPLANTATION FAILURES. Actual Problems of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (2), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2025.2.15791

Issue

Section

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY