COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS IN PREMATURE CHILDBIRTH CESARANEAN SECTION BY CLASSICAL METHOD AND MODIFIED METHODOLOGY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2021.v.i1.11733

Keywords:

cesarean section, premature birth, blood loss, modification

Abstract

The aim – to carry out a comparative analysis of the volume of intraoperative blood loss during cesarean section (CS) according to the classical method and when using a modified technique in conditions of preterm labor (PL).

Material and Methods. A comparative analysis of 59 cases of preterm birth, the delivery of which was by the abdominal route, was carried out. The main group (clinical I) consisted of 29 patients in whom the caesarean section was performed according to the proposed modified technique. Comparative group (II clinical) - 30 patients who were operated on by the classical CS method. For a more reliable analysis, each clinical group was divided into two subgroups depending on the gestational age (29-33 weeks 6 days and 34-36 weeks and 6 days, respectively). The main differences of the proposed method of abdominal delivery are the use of an improved method of entering the abdominal cavity and simultaneous suturing of the wound on the uterus by two operators, starting from the corners of the wound with a continuous single-row vicryl suture with a fixing loop at each of the ends of two threads. In cases of the birth of children in the early stages of up to 30 weeks of gestation, a corporal incision in the uterus and their birth in the whole fetal bladder.

Results. We found that the use of a modified technique of abdominal delivery helps to reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss in PL by almost 300 ml (p<0.001), minimizes the development of massive obstetric bleeding (MAC), virtually eliminates the need for intraoperative blood transfusion and hysterectomy (p<0.05).

Conclusions. The data confirm the effectiveness of using the improved technique of abdominal delivery to reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss in PR.

Author Biography

D. O. Hryhurko, Odesa National Medical University

асистент кафедри акушерства та гінекології Одеського національного медичного університету МОЗ України

References

Ziyadinov, A.A, Sulima, A.N, & Rybalka, A.N. (2015). Prichiny kesareva secheniya pri prezhdevremennykh rodakh [Reasons for caesarean section in preterm labor]. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik – Tauride medical and biological bulletin, 1 (69), 44-47 [in Russian].

Dyak, K.V, & Yuzko, O.M. (2017). Prychynni faktory peredchasnykh polohiv (novyi pohliad na problemu) [Causal factors of premature birth (a new look at the problem)]. Neonatolohiya, khirurhiya ta perynatalna medytsyna – Neonatology, surgery and perinatal medicine, 1 (23), 62-68 [in Ukrainian].

Di Renzo, G.C., Cabero Roura, L., Facchinetti, F., Helmer, H., Hubinont, C., Jacobsson, B., & Visser, G.H.A. (2017). Preterm labor and birth management: recommendations from the european association of perinatal medicine. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., 30 (17), 2011-2030.

Krasnopolsky, V.I. (Ed.) (2018). Kesarevo secheniye. Problemy abdominalnogo akusherstva: ruk. dlya vrachey [Cesarean section. Problems of abdominal obstetrics: a guide for doctors]. 3rd ed., revised. and add. Moscow: SIMK [in Russian].

Kamenskikh, G.V., & Novikova, V.A. (2019). Vozmozhnosti prognozirovaniya krovotecheniya u zhenshchin s prezhdevremennymi rodami [Possibilities for predicting bleeding in women with preterm labor]. Nauchnoye obozreniye. Meditsinskiye nauki – Sci. Rev. Med. Sci., 2, 63-73 [in Russian].

Boyko, V.I., & Babar, T.V. (Ed.) (2017.) Akusherski krovotechi: navch. posib. [Obstetric bleeding: a textbook]. Sumy: SDMU [in Ukrainian].

Adamyan, L.V., & Serova, V.N. (2013). Kesarevo secheniye: pokazaniya, metody obezbolivaniya, khirurgicheskaya tekhnika: klinicheskiye rekomendatsii [Caesarean section: indications, methods of anesthesia, surgical technique: clinical guidelines]. Moscow [in Russian].

Korchinska, O.O., & Gulpe, K.Yu. (2013). Materynski ta perynatalni naslidky, poviazani z kesarevym roztynom: porivnialnyi analiz iz dosvidom koleh zi Slovachchyny [Maternal and perinatal inheritance, tied with caesarean rostin: a preliminary analysis from the previous colleagues from Slovakia]. Problemy klinichnoi pediatrii – Problems of Clinical Pediatrics, 3 (21), 35-39 [in Ukrainian].

Fatkullin, I.F, Akhmadeev, N.R, & Fatkullin, F.I. (2015). Kesarevo secheniie s izvlecheniem plodov v tselom plodnom puzyre pri beremennosti dvoyney [Cesarean section with the extraction of fetuses in the whole fetal bladder during pregnancy with twins]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya – Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 (8), 29-32 [in Russian].

Sunderam, S., Kissin, D.M., Crawford, S., Anderson, J.E., Folger, S.G., Jamieson, D.J., & Barfield, W.D. (2013). Assisted reproductive technology surveillance –United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill. Summ., 62 (9), 1-24.

Trojner-Bregar, A., Tul, N., Verdenik, I., Novak, Z., & Blickstein, I. (2013). Puerperal morbidity following repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol., 288 (3), 551-554. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2818-8

Barrett, J.F., Hannah, M.E., Hutton, E.K., Willan, A.R., Allen, A.C., Armson, B.A., & Asztalos, E.V. (2013). A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med., 369 (14), 1295–1305. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939

Linder, N., Linder, I., Fridman, E., Kouadio, F., Lubin, D., Merlob, P., & Melamed, N. (2013). Birth trauma – risk factors and short-term neonatal outcome. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., 26 (15), 1491-1495. DOI: 10.3109/ 14767058.2013.789850

Sarbasova, A.E. (2018). Optimizatsiya metodov snizheniya krovopoteri pri operatsii kesareva secheniya [Optimization of methods for reducing blood loss during cesarean section]. Candidate᾽s thesis. Astrakhan [in Russian].

Lakatosh, V.P., Narytnyk, T.T., Bila, V.V., Aksonova, A.V., & Tkalich, V.O. (2014). Peredchasni polohy: protyrichchia ta suchasni realii [Premature birth: contradictions and modern realities]. Zdorovye zhenshchyny – Women᾽s Health, 7 (93), 10-18 [in Russian].

Egorova, Ya.A., Zabolotnov, V.A., & Rybalka, A.N. (2015). Zaderzhka vnutriutrobnogo razvitiya ploda v perinatalnoy meditsine (obzor) [Delayed intrauterine development of the fetus in perinatal medicine (review)]. Zdorovye zhenshchyny – Women᾽s Health, 4, 48-51 [in Russian].

Bashmakova, N.V. (2014). Sverkhranniye prezhdevremennyye rody: novyie rezultaty. Optimizatsiya klinicheskikh iskhodov prezhdevremennykh rodov: opyt Uralskogo federalnogo okruga [Very early preterm labor: new results. Optimization of clinical outcomes of preterm birth: the experience of the Ural Federal District]. Status Prаesens, 6 (23), 13-19 [in Russian].

Znamenska, T.K., Kirilova, L.G., Shveikina, V.B. (2013). Diahnostyka hipoksychno-ishemichnoho urazhennia holovnoho mozku v nedonoshenykh novonarodzhenykh u hostromu periodi [Diagnostics of hypoxic-ischemic lesion of the brain in preterm neonatal infants in the state of emergency]. Perynatolohiya ta pediatriya – Perinatology and Pediatrics, 2 (54), 26-30 [in Ukrainian].

Gladchuk, І.Z., Shpak, I.V., Herman, Y.V., & Hryhurko, D.O. (2019). Comparative analysis of intraoperative blood loss during the classical cesarean section described by M. Stark and the modified cesarean section. Wiad. Lek.,12 (72), 2329-2333.

Hladchuk, I.Z., Volianska, A.H., Herman, Yu.V., & Hryhurko, D.O. (2019). Porivnialnyi analiz neonatalnykh naslidkiv pislia klasychnoho (za M. Stark) ta modyfikovanoho kesarevoho roztynu pry peredchasnykh polohakh [Comparative analysis of neonatal consequences after classical (according to M. Stark) and modified cesarean section in premature birth]. Visnyk Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho medychnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 3 (23), 414-419 [in Ukrainian].

(2019). Klinichnyi protokol z akusherskoi dopomohy «Kesariv roztyn». Clinical protocol for obstetric and gynecological care «cesarean section». Nakaz Ministerstva okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy. Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. No. 977 Retrieved from: http://old.moz.gov.ua/ua/portal/dn_20111227_977 [in Ukrainian].

Novikova, V.A., Kamenskikh, G.V., Avakimyan, A.A., Khorolsky, V.A., & Chernobay, E.G. (2018). Sravnitelnaya kharakteristika poslerodovykh krovotecheniy v razlichnyie sroki beremennosti [Comparative characteristics of postpartum bleeding at different stages of pregnancy]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern Probl. Sci. Educ., 1, 202-208 [in Russian].

Niyazmetov, R.E., Matyakubov, B.B., & Khabibullaev, D.M. (2020). Osobennosti lecheniya massivnogo akusherskogo krovotecheniya v retrospektivnoy gruppe [Features of the treatment of massive obstetric bleeding in the retrospective group]. Meditsina neotlozhnykh sostoyaniy – Emergency Medicine, 4 (16), 70-74 [in Russian].

Herman, Yu.V., & Hryhurko, D.O. (2018). Chy mozhlyvo dyvytysia na bud-yaku medychnu spetsialnist ochyma inshoho spetsialista? Multydystsyplinarnyi pidkhid na osnovi vlasnoho dosvidu [Is it possible to look at any medical specialty through the eyes of another specialist? Multidisciplinary approach based on personal experience]. Zdorovia zhinky – Women᾽s Health, 1 (58), 30-32 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-04-29

How to Cite

Hryhurko, D. O. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS IN PREMATURE CHILDBIRTH CESARANEAN SECTION BY CLASSICAL METHOD AND MODIFIED METHODOLOGY. Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, (1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2021.v.i1.11733

Issue

Section

Оригінальні дослідження