COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF IMMUNE STATUS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF COURSE IN PATIENTS WITH SPORADIC AND FAMILIAL FORMS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Authors

  • N. P. Voloshina Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
  • T. V. Nehreba Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
  • T. M. Pohuliaieva Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
  • V. M. Kirzhner Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2020.v.i1.11069

Keywords:

multiple sclerosis, immune indicators, cellular and humoral immunity, mathematical analysis

Abstract

In recent decades, the leading role of immunopathological disorders in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been conclusively proven. However, the complex and ambiguous nature of clinical and immunological relationships in different types of MS, given the hereditary burden of this disease, need further study.

Material and Methods. An analysis of 197 immunograms was performed in patients with different types of MS course with sporadic and familial forms: 110 – in patients with sporadic and 27 – with familial forms in a relapsing course (RC); 41 – with sporadic and 19 – with familial forms with progressive types of course (PC) of MS. To determine the cellular and humoral immunity links in blood serum, 16 indicators were studied within the normative values, above and below the norm.

Results. The analysis showed that in two forms with RT, a pronounced deficiency of the regulatory cell link (CD4 and CD8) and an increased content of lymphocytotoxic autoantibodies (p<0.05) were found. In the family form of RT, the number of studies with an increase in IgM and complement significantly combined with leukopenia and B-lymphocytosis (p<0.05). With PC RS for the sporadic form, complement, immune complexes and lymphocytotoxic autoantibodies were significantly increased. With help of mathematical (permutation method) and statistical (contingency tables) analyzes, were obtained the following: reliable numerical differences between the forms; the average number of deviations from the norm for all immunological indicators; connections between pairs of characters according to the chi-square criterion with enumeration of all possible pairs of 16 immunological indicators.

As a result of researches, significant differences were obtained in the structural organization of the immune imbalance for sporadic and familial forms of MS, that selectively affected both the cellular and humoral components of immunity, as well as the integral indicators obtained using mathematical methods.

References

Barkhatova, V.P., Zavalishin, I.A., Khaidarov, B.T., Demina, E.G., & Shavratskyy, V.Kh. (2000). Biokhimicheskiye mekhanizmy narusheniya neyroimmunnogo vzaimodeystviya pri rasseyannom skleroze [Biochemical mechanisms of impaired neuroimmune interaction in multiple sclerosis]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S. S. Korsakova – Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry named after S. S. Korsakova, 11, 42-47 [in Russian].

Voloshina, N.P., Vasilovskyy, V.V., Negreba, T.V., & Levchenko, I.L. (2014). Sravnitelnaya strukturno-funktsionalnaya kharakteristika immunnogo disbalansa u lits raznogo pola pri retsidiviruyushchem i progrediyentnykh tipakh techeniya rasseyannogo skleroza [Comparative structural and functional characteristics of the immune imbalance in individuals of different sexes with recurrent and progressive types of multiple sclerosis]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian Newsletter of Neuropsychiatrist, 22, 1 (78), 28-36 [in Russian].

Matsui, M. (2008). Multiple sclerosis immunology for clinicians. Neurology Asia, 13, 195-198.

Gandhi, R., Laroni, A., & Weiner, H. L. (2010). Role of the innate immune system in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroim., 221, 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.10.015

Koliada, T.I., Voloshyna, N.P., & Nehreba, T.V. (2004). Porivnialna kharakterystyka imunnoho statusu pry riznykh typakh perebihu rozsiianoho sklerozu [The characteristic of immune status in the case of different types of interruption of sclerosis is alternate]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian Bulletin of Psychoneurology, 12, 2 (39), 88-94 [in Ukrainian].

Levchenko, I.L., & Negreba, T.V. (2010). Osobennosti immunnogo statusa u muzhchin i zhenshchin pri retsidiviruyushchem techenii rasseyannogo skleroza [Features of the immune status in men and women with a relapsing course of multiple sclerosis]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian Bulletin of Psychoneurology, 18, 2 (63), 20-23 [in Russian].

Voloshina, N.P., Levchenko, I.L., & Negreba, T.V. (2011). Gendernyye razlichiya immunnogo statusa pri progrediyentnykh tipakh techeniya rasseyannogo skleroza [Gender differences in immune status in progressive types of multiple sclerosis]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian Bulletin of Psychoneurology, 19, 4 (69), 5-9 [in Russian].

Lisyanyy, N.I. (2003). Immunologiya i immunoterapiya rasseyannogo skleroza [Immunology and immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis]. Kyiv [in Russian].

Frolov, V.M., & Rychnev, V.E. (1986). Issledovaniye tsirkuliruyushchikh immunnykh kompleksov: diagnosticheskoye i prognosticheskoye znacheniye [Research of circulating immune complexes: diagnostic and prognostic value]. Laboratornoye delo – Laboratory Work, 3, 159-161 [in Russian].

Published

2020-05-05

How to Cite

Voloshina, N. P., Nehreba, T. V., Pohuliaieva, T. M., & Kirzhner, V. M. (2020). COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF IMMUNE STATUS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF COURSE IN PATIENTS WITH SPORADIC AND FAMILIAL FORMS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, (1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2020.v.i1.11069

Issue

Section

Оригінальні дослідження