EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS EXOGENOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2019.1.9990Keywords:
exogenous endophthalmitis, Staphylococcus aureus, experimental model, inoculation of pathogenAbstract
Exogenous endophthalmitis develops due to the penetration of the pathogen into the eye. Postoperative endophthalmitis dominates and makes up about 70–80 %, most often the cause of that is aerobic gram-positive bacteria (90 %). Whereas, post-traumatic endophthalmitis makes up about 25 %, in which in 26.9–37.1% of cases etiological factor is Staphylococcus aureus.
The aim of the study – creation of an effective model of exogenous staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis in experimental animals.
Materials and Methods. The experiment was conducted in 120 chinchilla rabbits, which were divided into 2 groups (60 rabbits or 120 eyes each): the control and the main. In the control group, intravitreal injection of 10.000 microbial bodies of the strain Staphylococcus aureus 3a from the patient's conjunctiva was performed on two eyes. In the main – 150.000 microbial bodies of the daily culture of the museum strain of microorganisms Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923F - 49. The clinical picture of the experimental endophthalmitis was evaluated by point system. The degree of inflammatory changes in the eye in each group of the study was determined by the sum of the scores of the averages.
Results and Discussion. In the control group of rabbits, only on the 4th day after infection, mild endophthalmitis was obtained in 104 eyes (86.6 %). The average total number of points of severity of inflammation was (4.3±0.6). In the main group of rabbits, on the 2nd day after the inoculation of the pathogen, endophthalmitis developed in all eyes (100 %), where in 28 eyes (23.3 %) inflammation corresponded to mild severity, in 92 eyes (76.7 %) – severe. In two eyes (1.7 %) an eyeball perforation occurred. The average total number of points of the severity of inflammation was (9.8±1.0).
Conclusions. Obtaining an effective model of exogenous staphylococcal endophthalmitis makes it possible to re-create it for the study of various aspects of the development and treatment of this pathology.
References
Weishaupt, K.R., Gomer, C.J., & Dougherty, T.J. (1976). Identification of singlet oxygen as the cytotoxic agent in photo-inactivation of a murine tumor. Cancer research, 36 (7 Part 1), 2326-2329.
Gundorova, R.A., Neroyeva, V.V., & Kashnikova, V.V. (Eds) (2009). Travmy glaza [Eye injuries]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, p. 560 [in Russian].
Seal, D., & Pleyer, U. (2007). Ocular infection. NY: Informa helthcare, р. 380.
Wyss, P., Tadir, Y., Tromberg, B.J., & Haller, U. (2000). Photodynamic Therapy for Cervical Dysplasia. In: Photomedicine in gynecology and reproduction. Basel: Karger, 265-269.
Skladchikova, N.Yu., Stebnev, V.S., & Skladchikova, N.I. (2011). Ostryy bakterialnyy endoftalmit kak oslozhneniye khirurgii katarakty. Rezultaty lecheniya [Acute bacterial endophthalmitis as a complication of cataract surgery. Results of treatment]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 14 (133) [in Russian].
Mayer, E., Cadman, D., Ewings, P., Twomey, J.M., Gray, R.H., Claridge, K. G., ... & Bates, A.K. (2003). A 10 year retrospective survey of cataract surgery and endophthalmitis in a single eye unit: injectable lenses lower the incidence of endophthalmitis. British journal of ophthalmology, 87 (7), 867-869.
Albert, D.M., & Jakobiec, F.A. (2000). Postoperative endophthalmitis. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2441-2462.
Roberts, C.W., McDonnel, P.J., Pascucci, S.E., Olson, R.Y., & Snyder, R.W. (2002). Antibacterial theraphy and intraocular surgery: problems and decisions. Ophthalmol. Times, 27 (5), 16.
Callegan, M.C., Engelbert, M., Parke, D.W., Jett, B.D., & Gilmore, M.S. (2002). Bacterial endophthalmitis: epidemiology, therapeutics, and bacterium-host interactions. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15 (1), 111-124.
Johnson, M.W., Doft, B.H., Kelsey, S.F., Barza, M., Wilson, L.A., Barr, C.C., ... & Jessup, L.M. (1997). The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: relationship between clinical presentation and microbioloaic spectrum. Ophthalmology, 104 (2), 261-272.
Al-Omran, A.M., Abboud, E.B., & El-asrar, A.M.A. (2007). Microbiologic spectrum and visual outcome of posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Retina, 27 (2), 236-242.
Moreau, J.M., Sloop, G.D., Engel, L.S., Hill, J.M., & O'Callaghan, R.J. (1997). Histopathological studies of staphylococcal alpha-toxin: effects on rabbit corneas. Current eye research, 16 (12), 1221-1228.
Booth, M.C., Atkuri, R.V., Nanda, S.K., Iandolo, J.J., & Gilmore, M.S. (1995). Accessory gene regulator controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in endophthalmitis. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 36 (9), 1828-1836.
Rodin, S.S. (1993). Intravitrealnoye primeneniye gordoksa v lechenii ekzogennogo bakterialnogo endoftalmita [Intravitreal use of gordox in the treatment of exogenous bacterial endophthalmitis]. Candidathes thesis. Odessa, p. 196 [in Russian].
Peyman, G.A., Paque, J.T., Meisels, H.I., & Bennett, T.O. (1975). Postoperative endophthalmitis: a comparison of methods for treatment and prophlaxis with gentamicin. Ophthalmic surgery, 6 (1), 45-55.
Satger, D., Pegourie, P., Romanet, J.P., Castejon, H., & Chiquet, C. (2007). Ultrasound imaging in the management of endophthalmitis. Journal français d'ophtalmologie, 30 (10), 1037-1048.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who sent their manuscript to "Вісник наукових досліджень. Bulletin of Scientific Research" Surgery agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)