CONNECTIONS OF COMPUTER-TOMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DENTAL ARCHES WITH ODONTOMETRIC AND CEPHALOMETRIC INDICES OF BRACHYCEPHALIC GIRLS WITH ORTHOGNATHIC BITE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2018.1.8853Keywords:
girls-brachycephals with orthognatic bite, correlations, metric characteristics of the dental arch, odontometric indicators, cephalometric indicators.Abstract
For correct modeling of the shape of the dental arch, it is necessary to establish the most informative interrelated tooth parameters and the head.
The aim of the study – to carry out an analysis of the correlations of CT-sizes necessary for the construction of the correct form of the dental arch with odontometric and cephalometric characteristics of brachycephalic girls with orthognathic bite.
Materials and Metohods. The research was carried out in accordance with the self-developed scheme using the Veraviewepocs 3D dental cone beam. Measurements of the following sizes of upper and lower incisors, canines, small and first large angular teeth (respectively, SAT and LAT ): length of the tooth, root length in vestibule-tongue and mesiodistal projections, mesiodistal and vestibuletongue sizes crowns of the tooth, width of dentineenamel boundaries in mesiodistal and vestibule-tongue directions. Also, the transversal dimensions of the upper and lower jaw and sagittal characteristics of the dental arch and cephalometric dimensions were determined. The correlation analysis of the results obtained in girls-mesocephals (n = 26) was performed using the nonparametric Spirman method in the statistical package "Statistica 6.0".
Results and Discussion. In brachycephalic girls with orthognathic bite, 348 reliable and average strength of false connections were detected out of 1116 possible (31.2 %, of which 17.9 % of false median force) with dental arc parameters in the frontal plane (of which 6 – 0.5 % of direct strong; 132 – 11.8 % of direct average strength; 181 – 16.2 % of false direct average forces; 10 – 0.9 % of reciprocal average strength; 19 – 1.7 % of unreliable reciprocal average forces); 79 out of 279 possible (28,3%, of which 14,3% are unreliable average forces) with parameters of maxillary dental arches in the sagittal plane (of which 3 – 1.1 % of direct strong; 34 – 12.2 % direct average strength; 35 – 12.5 % of false direct middle forces; 2 – 0.7 % of reciprocal average strength; 5 – 1.8 % of false reciprocal average forces); 88 out of 279 possible (31.5 %, of which 12.9 % of the unreliable mean strength) with the parameters of the maxillary dental arch in the vertical plane (of which 2 – 0.7 % of direct strong; 50 – 17.9 % direct average strength; 36 – 12.9 % of false direct middle forces).
Conclusions. 1. In brachycephalic girls, in all groups the reliable and average strength of the unreliable correlations of the linear sizes necessary for the correct form of the dental arch with dental size and cephalometric indices have almost the same percentage – 31.2 % with transversal dimensions of the upper and lower jaw; 28.3 % with parameters of maxillary dental arch in sagittal plane and 31.5 % with parameters of maxillary dental arch in vertical plane. 2. Relative majority of reliable and average strength of inaccurate correlations of transversal dimensions of the upper and lower jaw in brachycephalic girls is established with the vestibule-tongue size of crowns of teeth (34.7%), with teeth lengths (44.2%) and with the width of dentin-enamel boundaries in the mesiodistal direction (30.6 %). 3. Most correlations of the parameters of the maxillary dental arch in the sagittal plane in brachycephalic girls are established with mesiodistal dimensions of crowns of teeth (55.6 %), with the width of the dentin-enamel border in the mesiodistal (55.6 %) and vestibule-tongue (38.9 %) directions and with the length of the root in the vestibule-tongue (44.4 %) and mesiodistal (38.9 %) projections; and the parameters of the maxillary dental arc in the vertical plane – with mesiodistal (52.8 %) and vestibule-tongue (63.9 %) sizes of crowns of teeth and with the width of the dentin-enamel border in the vestibule-tongue direction (44.4 %).
References
Alekseev, V.P. & Debets, G.F. (1964). Kraniometriya: metodika antropologicheskih issledovaniy [Craniometry: anthropological research methodology]. M. : Nauka []in Russian].
Domenyuk, D.A., Vedeshina, E.G., Dmitrienko, S.V., Dmitrienko, D.S., Nalbandyan, L.V., & Gagloyeva, N.F. (2015). Vliyanie odontometricheskih parametrov na formu i razmery mezognaticheskih zubnykh dug [Impact of odontometric parameters on shape and size of mesognathic dental arches]. Kubanskiy nauchnyiy meditsinskiy vestnik – Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik, 4, 73-78 [in Russian].
Muzurova, L.V., Mikheeva, M.V., Konnov, V.V., & Sheludko, S.N. (2014). Izmenchivost parametrov zubnoy dugi nizhney chelyusti u zhenschin s razlichnymi formami litsa [Variability of parameters of the dental arch of the lower jaw in women with different facial forms]. Byulleten meditsinskih internet – Bulletin of medical Internet conferences, 4(6), 937-939 [in Russian].
Dmitrienko, S.V., Dmitrienko, D.S., Klimova, N.N., Bavlakova, V.V., & Sevastyanov, A.V. (2011). K voprosu o postroenii dugi Hauleya [To the question of Hawley’s arch construction]. Ortodontiya – Ortodontiya, 2 (54), 11-13 [in Russian].
Berdin, V.V., Sevastyanov, A.V., Fischev, S.B., Dmitrienko, D.S., & Lepilin, A.V. (2013). K voprosu opredeleniya razmerov zubnykh dug v sagittalnom i transverzalnom napravleniyakh [To the problem of determining the dimensions of dental arches in the sagittal and transversal directions]. Stomatologiya detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika – Stomatology of child's age and prophylaxis, ХII, 3 (46), 43-45 [in Russian].
Маrchenko, А.V. (2017). Koreliacii liniinykh rozmiriv neobkhidnykh dlia pobudovy korektnoi formy zubnoi duhy z odontometrychnymy i kefalometrychnymy pokaznykamy divchat iz ortognatychnym prykusom [Correlation of linear sizes necessary for construction of the correct form of dental arch with odontometric and cephalometric parameters of girls with orthognathic bite]. Visny`k morfologiyi – Reports of Morphology, 23 (2), 273-278 [in Ukrainian].
Bushan, M.G., Vasilenko, Z.S., & Grigorieva, L.P. (1990). Spravochnik po ortodontii [Handbook of orthodontics]. Kishenev : Kartya Moldovenyaske [in Russian].
Felton, J.M., Sinclair, P.M., Jones, D.L., & Alexander, R.G. (1987). A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am. J.Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92, 478-483.
Mаrchenko, А.V., Gunas, І.V., Petrushanko, T.O., Serebrennikova, O.А., & Trofimenko, Yu.Yu. (2017). Computer-tomographic characteristics of root length incisors and canines of the upper and lower jaws in boys and girls with different craniotypes and physiological bite. Wiadomości Lekarskie, LXX (3, I), 499-502.
Anderson, G., Fields, H.W., Beck, M., Chacon, G., & Vig, K.W. (2006). Development of Cephalometric Norms Using a Unified Facial and Dental Approach. The Angle Orthodontist, 76 (4), 612-618.
Slaj, M., Spalj, S., Jelusic, D., & Slaj, M. (2011). Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 140 (5), 680-687.
Gunas, I.V., Dmitriev, N.A., & Marchenko, A.V. (2015). Methodological aspects of computed tomography odontomorphometry of boys and girls with the physiological bite. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 5 (11), 345-355.
Budai, M., Farkas, L.G., Tompson, B., Katie, М., & Forrest, C.R. (2003). Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women. J. Craniofac. Surg., 14, 2, 154-161.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who sent their manuscript to "Вісник наукових досліджень. Bulletin of Scientific Research" Surgery agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)