PSYCHO-EMOTIONAL STATE OF NURSES AFTER USING PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT DURING COVID-19 PATIENT CARE

Authors

  • S. A. Chorniy I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • Yu. O. Danylevych I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • S. V. Danchak I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2411-1597.2024.2.14798

Keywords:

nurse, psychological stress, personal protective equipment, COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Introduction. Nurses, like other medical personnel, actively use personal protective equipment (PPE) during the performance of their professional duties. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of PPE was particularly important and widespread. However, long-term use of these agents can negatively affect both the physical and mental health of medical personnel. Nurses experience significant stress, fatigue, anxiety and other psychological difficulties while performing their professional duties. Assessment of their psycho-emotional state is important not only to preserve their own well-being, but also to ensure the effectiveness of medical care.

The aim of the study – to assess the psycho-emotional state of nurses after using PPE during the performance of their professional duties while caring for patients with COVID-19 and other acute respiratory diseases.

The main part. Determining the physical and psychological conditions of nurses during the performance of their professional duties during the COVID 19 pandemic and determining the level of residual stress, as nurses are the most vulnerable category in terms of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and the development of COVID-19. To study the level of psychological stress, surveys and questionnaires were used, such as PSS-10 (The Perceived Stress Scale-10 is a valid and widely used questionnaire for determining the level of subjective stress), the method «Burnout syndrome in professions of the “person – person” system K. Maslach, S. Jackson, in the adaptation of N. E. Vodopyanova, the method “Research of the “burnout” syndrome by J. Greenberg.

Conclusions. Medical workers’ continuous use of personal protection equipment compromises their physical condition and leads to the development of biological stress. Increased demands and duties, unpredictable working hours, fear of infecting loved ones, and disbelief in protective measures all contribute to psychological stress. The combination of biological and psychological stress can have major consequences for healthcare personnel, particularly in pandemic or high-risk scenarios, where they encounter physical stress, anxiety for their own health, and insufficient resources. Such settings can induce severe stress and psychological weariness in health care workers, necessitating systemic interventions to maintain their physical and mental wellbeing.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.who.int.

Yavorovskyi, O.P., Shkurba, A.V., Skaletskyi, Yu.M., Brukhno, R.P., Kharchuk, L.V., Bugro, V.I., Ryganet, M.M. (2020) Hihiiena ta okhorona pratsi medychnoho personalu v umovakh podolanyia pandemii COVID-19 (pershe povidomlennia) [Hygiene and labour protection of medical staff under conditions of the pandemic COVID-19 overcoming (first message)]. Dovkillia ta zdorovia– Environment and health, 3(96), 10-18 [in Ukrianian]. DOI: 10.32402/dovkil2020.03.010.

Basanets, A.V., Hvozdestkiiy, V.A., Ostapenko, T.A., Zhurakivska, N.V., Kharchuk, L.V. (2020) Standarty vyznannia COVID-19 yak hostroho profesiinoho zakhvoriuvannia v Ukraini ta zghidno z polozhenniamy mizhnarodnoi orhanizatsii pratsi [Standards for the recognition of COVID-19 as an acute occupational disease in Ukraine according to recommendations of the International Labor Organization] Ukr. zhurnalu z problem medytsyny pratsi – Ukrainian Journal of Occupational Health, 2, 86-95 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.33573/ujoh2020.02.086.

COVID-19: occupational health and safety for health workers: interim guidance, 2 February 2021. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/339151/WHO-2019-nCoV-HCW-advice-2021.1-ukr.pdf.

IASC: Inter-Agency Standing Committety COVID-19 Impact on Humanitarian Emergencies: August 2021 Highlights. Retrieved from: https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/health/covid-19-impact-humanitarian-emergencies-june-2021-highlights.

Alao, M.A. (2020). Assessment of health workers’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and use of personal protective equipment for prevention of COVID-19 infection in low-resource settings. Hindawi Advances in Public Health. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4619214.

Ahorsu, D.K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M.D., & Pakpour, A.H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8.

Norhayati, M.N., Che Yusof, R., & Azman, M.Y. (2021). Prevalence of Psychological Impacts on Healthcare Providers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9157. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179157.

Calderwood, L., Mears, J., & Fields, S. (2022). Psychological impact of coronavirus disease-2019 on healthcare workers. West Virginia Medical Journal, 118(1), 26-31. DOI: 10.21885/wvmj.2022.4.

Liu, X., Kakade, M., Fuller, C. J., Fan, B., Fang, Y., Kong, J., Guan, Z., & Wu, P. (2012). Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(1), 15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.02.003.

Arpaci, I., Karataş, K., & Baloğlu, M. (2020). The development and initial tests for the psychometric properties of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S). Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110108. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110108.

Pro zatverdzhennia minimalnykh vymoh bezpeky i okhorony zdorovia pry vykorystanni pratsivnykamy zasobiv indyvidualnoho zakhystu na robochomu mistsi [On the approval of the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of personal protective equipment by employees at the workplace] [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1494-18.

Brooks, S.K., Webster, R.K., Smith, L.E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G.J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3532534.

Klimanska, М., Haletska, І. (2019) Ukrayins’ka adaptaciya korotkogo p’yatyfaktornogo opytuvalnyka osobystosti TIPI (TIPI-UKR) [Ukrainian adaptation of the short five factor personality questionnaire TIPI (TIPI-UKR)]. Psyhologichnyj chasopys – Psychological bulletin, 9(5), 57-74. DOI: 10.31108/1.2019.5.9.4 [in Ukrainian].

Shkolina, N.V., Shapoval, I.I., Orlova, I.V., Kedyk, I.O., Stanislavchuk, M.A. (2020). Adaptatsiia ta validyzatsiia ukrainomovnoi versii shkaly stresostiikosti Konnora – Devidsona-10 (CD-RISC-10): aprobatsiia u khvorykh na ankilozyvnyi spondylit [Adaptation and validation of the Ukrainian version of the Connor-Davidson stress resistance scale-10 (CD-RISC-10): approbation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis]. Ukrainskyi revmatolohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Journal of Rheumatology, 80(2) [in Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.32471/rheumatology.2707-6970.80.15236.

Gradus Research (2020). Shcho vyklykaie stres u hromadian Ukrainy? Doslidzhennia rivnia stresu sered hromadian Ukrainy [What causes stress in citizens of Ukraine? Research on the level of stress among citizens of Ukraine] [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://gradus.app/documents/27/%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B0.pdf.

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Chorniy, S. A., Danylevych, Y. O., & Danchak, S. V. (2024). PSYCHO-EMOTIONAL STATE OF NURSES AFTER USING PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT DURING COVID-19 PATIENT CARE. Nursing, (2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.11603/2411-1597.2024.2.14798

Issue

Section

Articles