DELIVERY PLANNING: A CONTAMPORARY APPROACH TO BREECH PRESENTATION IN OBSTETRICS

Authors

  • O. M. Kalanzhova Одеський національний медичний університет
  • S. R. Galych Одеський національний медичний університет
  • M. I. Shchurko Одеський національний медичний університет
  • D. M. Shchurko Одеський національний медичний університет

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2018.1.8792

Keywords:

breech position, conservative delivery, cesarean section, perinatal outcomes.

Abstract

The aim of the study – to evaluate the effectiveness and the validity of individual delivery planning for breech presentations.

Materials and Methods. Pregnant patients were divided into two groups: 1) the main group (MG) (n=36) which included women with planned conservative deliveries for breech presentations; 2) the control group (CG) (n=33) which included women with planned cesarean deliveries for breech presentations.

Results and Discussion. Pregnancy completion in the majority of patients from both groups occurred in the planned way: MG – 27 (75 %), CG – 29 (87.8 %). The MG patients gave birth in the knee-elbow position – 11 (40.7 %) and with the help of Tsovianov method – 16 (53.9 %). There were 9 (25 %) cases of cesarean deliveries in the CG which were mainly classified as the 1st urgency category – 5 (55.5 %). The need for urgent cesarean section in the CG occurred in half as many cases – 4 (12.2 %) and most cases – 3 (75 %) – had the 3rd urgency category. Perinatal complications were more common among the children from the CG who had received manual help at birth: birth trauma – 8 (22.2 %), asphyxia – 3 (8.3 %), aspiration – 2 (5.55 %), hypoxicischemic brain damage – 3 (8.3 %).

Conclusions. The presented data indicate the lack of highly professional skills which require thorough execution and improvement of obstetrical manipulations by obstetricians and gynecologists.

Author Biography

O. M. Kalanzhova, Одеський національний медичний університет

 

References

Tursunova, G.A., Akhtamova, Z.M. & Nekbayev, Kh.S. (2012). Vliyaniye novykh tekhnologiy na iskhody rodov i sostoyaniye zdorovya novorozhdennykh, rodivshikhsya v tazovom predlezhanii [The influence of new technologies

on outcomes of childbirth and the state of health of newborns born in

breech presentation]. Vestnik neotlozhnoy i vosstanovitelnoy meditsiny – Bulletin of Urgent and Rehabilitation Medicine, 12, 1, 34-37 [in Russian].

(2012). Klinichnyy protokol z akusherskoi dopomohy «Kesariv roztyn» : Nakaz Ministerstva okhorony zdorovya Ukrayiny vid 27.12.2011 r. № 977 [Clinical protocol on obstetric care "Caesarean section": Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine dated December 27, 2011 No. 977]. Reproduktyvnaya endokrynolohyya – Reproductive endocrinology, 2 (4), 18-33 [in Ukrainian].

Burgos, J., Rodríguez, L. & Cobos, P. (2015). Management of breech presentation at term : a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience. Journal of Perinatology, 35, 10, 803-808.

Podsvirova, Ye.V., Romanova, T.A., Gurova, M.M., Bonchuk, N.S. & Tkacheva A.O. (2014). Vliyaniye techeniya beremennosti i rodov na sostoyaniye zdorovya novorozhdennogo rebenka [Influence of the course of pregnancy and childbirth on the state of health of a newborn child]. Nauchnyye vedomosti – Scientific sheets, 24, 185, 81-84 [in Russian].

Davydova, Yu.V., Chibisova, I.V., Babich, T.Yu. & Padalko, L.I. (2013). Tazovoye predlezhaniye : perinatalnyye aspekty [Pelvic perinatal peritoneal aspects]. Zhinochiy likar. – Womans doctor, 4, 27-30 [in Russian].

Cammu, H., Dony, N., Martens, G. & Colman, R. (2014). Common determinants of breech presentation at birth in singletons : a

population-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive, 177, 106-109.

Lyons, J., Pressey, T., Bartholomew, S., Liu, S., Liston, R.M. & Joseph, K.S. (2015). Delivery of breech presentation at term gestation in Canada, 2003-2011. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125, 5, 115-161.

Borbolla, F.A., Bagust, A. & Bisits, A. (2014). Lessons to be learnt in managing the breech presentation at term : an 11-year single-centre retrospective study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 54, 4, 333-339.

Nikulin, L.A., Litvinskaya, M.A. & Pomortsev, A.V. (2008). Vliyaniye razlichnykh sposobov rodorazresheniya pri tazovom predlezhanii ploda na techeniye perioda ranney adaptatsii novorozhdennykh i v blizhayshem katamneze [Nikulin LA Influence of different methods of delivery in pelvic presentation of the fetus during the period of early adaptation of newborns and in the nearest catamnesis].Kubanskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy vestnik –Kuban Scientific Medical Journal, 3, 4, 120-125 [in Russian].

Published

2018-05-03

How to Cite

Kalanzhova, O. M., Galych, S. R., Shchurko, M. I., & Shchurko, D. M. (2018). DELIVERY PLANNING: A CONTAMPORARY APPROACH TO BREECH PRESENTATION IN OBSTETRICS. Actual Problems of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (1). https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2018.1.8792

Issue

Section

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY