COMPARISON OF IMAGI NG MODALITIES OF THE UTERUS ANOMALIES.

Authors

  • N. S. Veresnyuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2016.1.5984

Keywords:

uterus anomalies, ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography.

Abstract

The article presents the results of a retrospective evaluation of different methods of imaging of the uterus anomalies in 132 patients. These data indicate that ultrasound and hysterosalpingography can be successfully used as screening methods for detection of anomalies of the female genital organs in patients with impaired reproductive health, but they do not always make it possible to differentiate the varieties.

References

The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review / Y. Y. Chan, K. Jayaprakasan, J. Zamora [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. Update. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 761–771.

Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results / G. F. Gribizis, M. Camus, B. C. Tarlatzis [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. Update. – 2001. – Vol.7. – P. 161–164.

Saravelos S. H. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal / S. H. Saravelos, K. A. Cocksedge, T-C. Li // Hum. Reprod. Update. – 2008. – Vol. 14. – P. 415–419.

Treatment of congenital malformations / S. Y. Brucker, K. Rall, R. Campo [et al.] // Semin. Reprod. Med. – 2011. –Vol. 29. – P. 101–112.

Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review / Y. Y. Chan, K. Jayaprakasan, A. Tan [et al.] // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. – 2011. – Vol. 38. – P. 371–382.

Obstructive Mullerian anomalies and modern laparoscopic management / L. C. Strawbrigde, N. S. Crough, A. S. Cutner [et al.] // Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. – 2007. – Vol. 20. – P. 195–200.

Silvina M. 3-Dimensional Sonography to Assess Uterine Anomalies / M. Silvina Bocca, Z. Alfred Abuhamad // Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. – 2013. – Vol. 13, № 1. – R. 1–6.

A systematic approach to the magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnosis of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies and their mimics / R. E. Yoo, J. Y. Cho, S. Y. Kim [et al.] // Abdom Imaging. – 2015. – Vol. 40, № 1. – P. 192–206.

Published

2016-04-04

How to Cite

Veresnyuk, N. S. (2016). COMPARISON OF IMAGI NG MODALITIES OF THE UTERUS ANOMALIES. Actual Problems of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (1). https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2016.1.5984

Issue

Section

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY