DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS OF PRETERM INFANTS DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF CARE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2022.2.13427

Keywords:

developmental status, preterm infants, ASQ-3 questionnaire

Abstract

The aim of the study – to assess the effectiveness of the active implementation of developmental care elements in preterm infants, in particular, its impact on the long-term outcomes, by observing and examining children at the follow-up at the corrected age of 24–30 months.

Materials and Methods. The study included an evaluation of the developmental status of preterm infants who received elements of neurodevelopmental care (25 infants) compared with a control group of infants who received standard care (25 infants). There was a clinical examination using the ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3rd Edition) questionnaire.

Research and Discussion. One child (4 %) of the developmental care group was diagnosed with a severe neurological pathology in the form of cerebral palsy in the follow-up, while in the standard care group - 6 children (24 %) were diagnosed with cerebral palsy and the autistic spectrum disorders, p=0.049. According to the results of the ASQ-3 questionnaire, the average total score for all areas of development in children of the developmental care group was 257.67 ± 23.36, while in the standard care group the indicator was significantly lower - 208.53 ± 67.70, p = 0.012. A significant difference was observed in preterm infants of the developmental care group in certain areas of development in comparison with infants of the control group (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the frequency of delay in communication, fine motor skills, and personal and social development and social interaction among observation groups at the corrected age of 24-30 months. The frequency of occurrence of these disorders prevailed in the group of children receiving standard care (p<0.05).

Conclusions. An active implementation of the developmental care elements improves the long-term outcomes of preterm infants and helps to reduce the level of severe pathology that leads to disability (cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders). Developmental care improves the psychomotor and neurological status of preterm infants at the corrected age of 24-30 months, particularly in the areas of communication, gross and fine motor skills, and personal and social development and social interaction.

Author Biography

H. A. Pavlyshyn, І. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

д.мед.н., професор, завідувач кафедри педіатрії №2

References

WHO. Preterm birth. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth.

Liu, L., Oza. S., Hogan, D., Chu, Y., Perin, J., & Zhu, J. (2016). Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet, 388(10063), 3027-3035. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8.

Barros, F.C., qar Ahmed Bhutta, Z., & Batra, M. (2010). Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth: evidence for effectiveness of interventions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 303-357. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S3.

Pochilko, V.I., Тraverse, G.M., Tsvirenko, S.M., Zhuk, L.A., & Оskomenko, М.М. (2016). Peredchasno narodzeni dity: suchasniy poglyad na postnatalnu adaptaciyu ta stan zdroviya v rannyomy viciі [Premature infants: a contemporary perspective on postnatal adaptation and health status in early life]. Visnyk problem biologii I mediciny – Herald of Problems of Biology and Medicine, 127(2), 23-27 [in Ukrainian].

(2012). March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO: Born Too Soon: the Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. Geneva, WHO.

Blondel, B., Lelong, N., Kermarrec, M., & Goffinet, F. (2011). Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2010: results from the National Perinatal Surveys. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod., 41, 151-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.014.

Burgueta, A., Kaminskib, M., & Abraham-Lerat, L. (2004). The complex relationship between smoking in pregnancy and very preterm delivery. Results of the Epipage study. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gyn, 111, 258-265. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00037.x.

Ancel, P., Goffinet, F., & EPIPAGE-2 Writing Group (2015). Survival and Morbidity of Preterm Children Born at 22 Through 34 Weeks’ Gestation in France in 2011Results of the EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatr., 169(3), 230-238.

Edstedt Bonamy, A.K., Zeitlinm J., & Piedvache, A. (2018). Wide variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm infants in European regions. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal. Neonatal. Ed., 104(1), F36-F45. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313697.

Mwaniki, M.K., Atieno, M., Lawn, J.E. & Newton, C.R. (2012). Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet, 379, 445-452.

Johnson, S., & Marlow, N. (2017). Early and long-term outcomes of infants born extremely preterm. Arch. Dis. Child, 102(1), 97-102. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309581.

Baio, J. (2012). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders – autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. MMWR. MMWR Surveill. Summ., 61, 1-19.

Moore, T., Johnson, S., Hennessy, E., & Marlow, N. (2012). Screening for autism in extremely preterm infants: problems in interpretation. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 54(6), 514-520. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04265.x.

Als, H., Gilkerson, L., Duffy, F.H., & Mcanulty, G. (2003). A Three-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Individualized Developmental Care for Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: Medical, Neurodevelopmental, Parenting, and Caregiving Effects. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr., 24(6), 399-408. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-200312000-00001.

Als, H., Duffy, F.H., McAnulty, G.B., Rivkin, M.J., Vajapeyam, S., & Mulkern, R.V. (2004). Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics, 13(4), 846-857. DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.4.846.

Campbell-Yeo, M.L., Disher, T.C., Benoit, B.L., & Johnston, C. (2015). Understanding kangaroo care and its benefits to preterm infants. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 6, 15-32. DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S51869.

Altimier, L., & Phillips, R. (2016). The Neonatal Integrative Developmental Care Model: Advanced Clinical Applications of the Seven Core Measures for Neuroprotective Family-centered Developmental Care. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 16(4), 230-244. DOI: 10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.030.

Lavallée, A., de Clifford-Faugère, G., Garcia, C., Oviedo, A.N., Héon, M., & Aita, M. (2019). Part 1: Narrative overview of developmental care interventions for the preterm newborn. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 25(1), 3-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnn.2018.08.008.

McAnulty, G., Duffy, F., Butler, S., Parad, R., Ringer, S. & Zurakowski, D. (2009). Individualized developmental care for a large sample of very preterm infants: Health, neuro-behavior and neurophysiology. Acta Pediatr., 98, 1920-1926. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01492.x.

Kleberg, A., Westrup, B., Stjernqvist, K., & Lagercrantz, H. (2002). Indications of improved cognitive development at one year of age among infants born very prematurely who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Early Hum. Dev., 68, 83-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(02)00014-2.

McAnulty, G., Duffy, F., Butler, S., Bernstein, J., Zurakowski, D., & Als, H. (2010). Effects of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) at age eight years: Preliminary data. Clin. Pediatr. (Phila), 49(3), 258-270. DOI: 10.1177/0009922809335668.

Ludington-Hoe, Susan M. (2015). Skin-to-Skin Contact: A Comforting Place with Comfort Food. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs., 40(6), 359-366. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000178.

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Pavlyshyn, H. A., & Sarapuk, I. M. (2022). DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS OF PRETERM INFANTS DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF CARE. Actual Problems of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2022.2.13427

Issue

Section

PEDIATRICS