PROPERTIES OF NEURAL PROCESSES IN СHILDREN WITH DIFFERENT PSYCHOTYPES

Authors

  • S. N. Vadziuk I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • M. I. Horishnyi I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • I. M. Horishnyi I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2019.2.10915

Keywords:

strength of neural processes, functional mobility of neural processes, human psychotype

Abstract

The aim of the study – to establish the relationship between human psychotype, strength and functional mobility of neural processes.

Materials and Methods. To determine the psychotype, 86 respondents were interviewed using the Weissband and Gulenko questionnaires. The analysis of nerve processes was performed with a computer program “Diagnost 1M”. Statistical processing of data was made by the method of nonparametric statistics, establishing U test – Mann-Whitney test.

Results and Discussion. The dependence of the number of stimuli processed in the study of the strength of the nervous processes using the feedback mode of the human psychotype (p <0.01) was established. In particular, the difference is between the leading functions of logic, ethics, and sensory. The highest indicator of the amount of information processing in sensors (621.28), the lowest – in logics (552.48). There was also a difference in functional mobility of nerve processes using the feedback mode between logic and ethics (p <0.05). In particular, the minimum reaction time for logic is less than 1.6 times. No dependency, response to moving object from psychotype was detected (p> 0.05).

Conclusions. The questionnaires identified Jung's psychological types in 60 respondents. On the basis of the computer program “Diagnost 1M” the strength and functional mobility of nervous processes in students were measured. The dependence of the above indicators on the human psychotype was established.

References

Kahanets, I. (1997). Psykholohichni aspekty v menedzhmenti: TypolohiiaYunha, sotsionika, psykhoinformatyka [Psychological aspects in management: Jung’s typology, socionics, psychoinformatics]. Kyiv – Ternopil: Vydavnytstvo “Mandrivets” – “Port – Royal” [in Ukrainian].

Prokofeva, T.N. (2005). Sotsyonyka. Algebra i geometriya chelovecheskykh vzaimootnosheniy [Algebra and geometry of human relationships]. Moscow: Izd-vo “Almaz” [in Russian].

Prokofeva, T.N, Prokofev, V.G., & Devyatkin, A.S. (2008). Sotsyonika dlya professyonalov. Sotsyonichyskiye tekhnologii v pedagogike i upravleniy personalom [Socionics for professionals. Socionic technologies in pedagogy and personnel management]. Izd-vo “Almaz” [in Russian].

Gulenko, V.V. (1999). Strukturno-funktsyonalnaya sotsyonyka: Razrabotka metoda kombinatoriky polyarnostey [Structural and functional socionics: Development of a method of combinatorics of polarities]. Kyiv: Transport Ukrainy [in Russian].

Dzh. Kammerou, Barger, N., & Kyrby, L. (2001). Vash psykhologicheskyy typ i stil raboty [Your psychological type and work style]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Psykhoterapii [in Russian].

Typy vyshchoi nervovoi diialnosti. Retrieved from: https://stud.com.ua/26963/meditsina/tipi_vischoyi_nervovoyi_diyalnosti

Lyzohub, V.S., Pustovalov, V.O., Suprunovych, V.O., & Koval, Yu.V. (2015). Zviazok spetsialnoi pidhotovlenosti ta stanu bioenerhetyk u futbolistiv 13-14 rokiv z typolohichnymy vlastyvostiamy tsentralnoi nervovoi systemy [The sound of special training and state of bioenergetics in football players of 13-14 years with typological features of the central nervous system]. Slobоzhanskyi naukovo-sportyvnyi visnyk – Slobozhansk Scientific and Sport Bulletin, 1, 70-74 [in Ukrainian].

Makarenko, M.V. (2011). Ontohenez psykhofiziolohichnykh funktsii liudyny [Ontogenesis of psychophysiological functional people]. Cherkasy: Vertykal [in Ukrainian].

Makarenko, M.V., & Lyzohub, V.S. (2003). Kompiuterna systema “Diahnost – 1” dlia vyznachennia neirodynamichnykh vlastyvostei vyshchoi nervovoi diialnosti [Computer system “Diagnostics – 1” for the recognition of neurodynamic features of the nervous activity]. Materialy sympoziumu “Osoblyvosti formuvannia ta stanovlennia psykhofiziolohichnykh funktsii v ontohenezi”. Cherkasy [in Ukrainian].

Makarenko, M.V. (2006). Osnovy profesiinoho vidboru viiskovykh spetsialistiv ta metodyky vyvchennia indyvidualnykh psykhofiziolohichnykh vidminnostei miz liudmy. [Basics of professional selection of military specialists and methods of studying individual psychophysiological differences between people]. Kyiv: O.O. Bohomolets Institute of Physiology [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-03-05

How to Cite

Vadziuk, S. N., Horishnyi, M. I., & Horishnyi, I. M. (2020). PROPERTIES OF NEURAL PROCESSES IN СHILDREN WITH DIFFERENT PSYCHOTYPES. Actual Problems of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, (2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2019.2.10915

Issue

Section

PEDIATRICS