QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH TUBOPERITONEAL INFERTILITY DURING THE TREATMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2019.1.10153Keywords:
tubal-peritoneal infertility, quality of life, controlled ovulation stimulationAbstract
The aim of the study – to learn the quality of life of reproductive age women with tubal-peritoneal infertility in the process of COS.
Materials and Methods. To achieve this goal, there was carried out a survey of 250 reproductive age women with tuboperitoneal infertility, who were divided into two groups and differed only by the used preparation for COS. The quality of life was assessed using the “SF 36” questionnaire and the “FertiQоl” international questionnaire (2008).
Results and Discussion. Evaluation of the quality of life using the “SF 36” questionnaire showed that before the onset of infertility treatment in women with tuboperitoneal infertility it was rather low, primarily due to the psychological component of health. A study of the quality of life using the FertiQoL questionnaire showed that the social component of quality of life of women with sterility suffered most of all. Repeated survey of patients with infertility was conducted on day 5 after embryotransfer. Only the indicator of role functioning reliably changed in the physical component of the quality of life: in the comparison group it became significantly less, both in relation to the initial state and in comparison with the main group. Analysis of the results of interviewing women using the FertiQoL questionnaire in the dynamics of COS showed that there was an improvement in the quality of life in the field of emotions in the main group.
Conclusion. Although, in general, the quality of life did not change significantly in the dynamics of treatment, therapy when using the prolonged preparation for COS was subjectively tolerated by patients better.
References
Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J.A., & Nygren, K.G. (2007). International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum. Reprod., 22 (6), 1506-1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046
Larsen, U. (2000). Primary and secondary infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Epidemiol., 29 (2), 285-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.2.285
Avramenko, N.V. (2014). Vspomogatelnyye reproduktivnyye tekhnologii [Assisted reproductive technologies]. Zaporozhskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal – Zaporozhye Medical Journal, 3 (84), 95-100 [in Russian].
Lokshin, V.N., & Dzhusubaliyeva, T.M. (Eds.). (2015). Klinicheskaya praktika v reproduktivnoy meditsine: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Clinical practice in reproductive medicine: a guide for doctors]. Almaty: MedMedia Kazakhstan [in Russian].
Radzinskiy, V.Ye., & Fuks, A.M. (Eds.). (2014). Ginekologiya: uchebnik [Gynecology: a textbook]. Moscow: GEOTAR Media [in Russian].
Forouhari, S., & Ghaemi, S.Z. (2013). A survey of psychosexual disorders in infertile women referred to the Zeinabiee Infertility Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 8 (4), 99-103.
Monga, M., Alexandrescu, B., Katz, S.E., Stein, M., & Ganiats, T. (2004). Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function. Urology, 63 (1), 126-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.015
Jun Chi, H., Park, I.H., Sun, H.G., Kim, J.W., & Lee, K.H. (2016). Psychological distress and fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) in infertile Korean women: The first validation study of Korean FertiQoL. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med., 43 (3), 174-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.174
Keramat, A., Masoomi, S.Z., Mousavi, S.A., Poorolajal, J., Shobeiri, F., & Hazavhei, S.M. (2014). Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. J. Res. Health Sci., 14 (1), 57-63.
Ramezanzadeh, F., Aghssa, M.M., Abedinia, N., Zayeri, F.,
Khanafshar, N., Shariat, M., et al. A survey of relationship between anxiety, depression and duration of infertility. BMC Womens Health, 4 (1), 9.
Ware, J.E., Snow, K.K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center. Boston, Mass.
Nedoshivin, A.O., Kutuzova, A.E., Petrova, N.N., Varshavskiy, S.Yu., & Perepech, N.B. (2000). Issledovaniye kachestva zhizni i psikhologicheskogo statusa bolnykh s khronicheskoy serdechnoy nedostatochnostyu [Study of the quality of life and psychological status of patients with chronic heart failure]. Serdechnaya nedostatochnost – Heart Failure, 1 (4), 45-51 [in Russian].
Boivin, J., Takefman, J., & Braverman, A. (2011). The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Human Reproduction, 26 (8), 2084-2091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der171
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).
