ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ДІАГНОСТИЧНИХ ТЕСТІВ У ПРОГРАМІ РАННЬОГО ВТРУЧАННЯ ДЛЯ ВИЯВЛЕННЯ ЗАТРИМКИ РУХОВОГО РОЗВИТКУ
(ОГЛЯД ЛІТЕРАТУРИ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2021.2.12681Ключові слова:
раннє втручання, оцінка розвитку, тести для ранньої діагностики рухових порушеньАнотація
Мета дослідження – систематичний огляд наявних даних для ранньої точної діагностики рухових порушень. Руховий розвиток відображає закономірність неврологічного розвитку. Рухи прогресують від примітивних, хаотичних до вільних керованих рухів, тому компетенція дітей у рухових навичках є одним із важливих показників здоровʼя, оскільки якщо дитина фізично активна в ранньому дитинстві, ймовірність виникнення багатьох хронічних захворювань у зрілому віці буде знижена. Діагностика затримки рухового розвитку протягом першого року життя є важливою, тому що ці дані часто вказують на більш загальні затримки у розвитку або конкретні порушення, зокрема на церебральний параліч. У статті було проаналізовано 10 загальновідомих тестів для ранньої діагностики рухових порушень. Саме рання діагностика рухових порушень дозволяє дітям своєчасно отримувати доступ до раннього втручання.
Посилання
Martyniuk, V.Yu. (2014). Diahnostychni kryterii rukhovykh porushen u nemovliat iz pozytsii dokazovoi medytsyny [Diagnostic criteria for motor disorders in infants from the standpoint of evidence-based medicine]. Mizhnarodnyi nevrolohichnyi zhurnal – International Journal of Neurology, 3, 164-165 [in Ukrainian].
Block, R.W., Dreyer, B.P., Cohen, A.R., Stapleton, F.B., Furth, S.L., & Bucciarelli, R.L. (2013). An agenda for children for the 113th Congress: recommendations from the Pediatric Academic Societies. Pediatrics, 131 (1), 109-119. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2661.
Raghupathy, M.K., Rao, B.K., Nayak, S.R., Spittle, A.J., & Parsekar, S.S. (2021). Effect of family-centered care interventions on motor and neurobehavior development of very preterm infants: a protocol for systematic review. Syst. Rev., 10 (1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01612-w.
Shepherd, E., Salam, R.A., Middleton, P., Han, S., Makrides, M., McIntyre, S., …, & Crowther, C.A. (2018). Neonatal interventions for preventing cerebral palsy: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 20, 6. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
Novak, I., Morgan, C., Adde, L., Blackman, J., Boyd, R.N., Brunstrom-Hernandez, J., …, & Badawi, N. (2017). Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA Pediatr., 171 (9), 897-907. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689.
Morgan, C., Fahey, M., Roy, B., & Novak, I. (2018). Diagnosing cerebral palsy in full-term infants. J. Paediatr. Child Health., 54 (10), 1159-1164. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14177.
Campbell, S.K., Wright, B.D., & Linacre, J.M. (2002). Development of a functional movement scale for infants. J. Appl. Meas., 3 (2), 190-204.
Ellison, P.H., Horn, J.L., & Browning, C.A. (1985). Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy. Phys. Ther., 65 (9), 1326-1331. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/65.9.1326.
Liao, W., Wen, E.Y., Li, C., Chang, Q., Lv, K.L., Yang, W., …, & Zhao, C.M. (2012). Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months. BMC Pediatrics, 12 (1), 72. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-72.
Sung, I.Y., & Kang, W. (1997). Infant neurological international battery (INFANIB) as a predictor of neuromotor outcome in risk infants. J. Korean Acad. Rehab. Med., 21 (2), 406-413.
Fuentefria, R.D.N., Silveira, R.C., & Procianoy, R.S. (2017). Motor development of preterm infants assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: systematic review article. J. Pediatr. (Rio J)., 93 (4), 328-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.03.003.
Campbell, S.K., Kolobe, T.H., Wright, B.D., & Linacre, J.M. (2002). Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 44 (4), 263-272. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201002043.
Piper, M.C., Pinnell, L.E., Darrah, J., Maguire, T., & Byrne, P.J. (1992). Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). J Public Health., 83, 46-50.
Seesahai, J., Luther, M., Church, P.T., Maddalena, P., Asztalos, E., Rotter, T., & Banihani, R. (2021). The assessment of general movements in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, as a predictive tool of cerebral palsy by 2 years of age-a scoping review. Syst. Rev., 10 (1), 226. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01765-8.
Prechtl, H.F. (2001). General movement assessment as a method of developmental neurology: new paradigms and their consequences. The 1999 Ronnie MacKeith lecture. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 43, 836-842. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201001529.
Kwong, A.K.L., Fitzgerald, T.L., Doyle, L.W., Cheong, J.L.Y., & Spittle, A.J. (2018). Predictive validity of spontaneous early infant movement for later cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 60 (5), 480-489. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13697.
Hamer, E.G., Bos, A.F., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2016). Specific characteristics of abnormal general movements are associated with functional outcome at school age. Early Hum. Dev., 95, 9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.01.019.
Campbell, S.K. (2021). Functional movement assessment with the Test of Infant Motor Performance. J. Perinatol., 41 (10), 2385-2394. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01060-3.
Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. (2013). A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 55 (5), 418-426. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12140.
Aizawa, C.Y., Einspieler, C., Genovesi, F.F., Ibidi, S.M., & Hasue, R.H. (2021). The general movement checklist: A guide to the assessment of general movements during preterm and term age. J. Pediatr., 97, 445-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.09.006.
Romeo, D.M., Ricci, D., Brogna, C., & Mercuri, E. (2016). Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 58 (3), 240-245. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12876.
Romeo, D.M., Cowan, F.M., Haataja, L., Ricci, D., Pede, E., Gallini, F., …, & Mercuri, E. (2021). Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination for infants born preterm: predicting outcomes other than cerebral palsy. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (8), 939-946. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14768.
Uusitalo, K., Haataja, L., Nyman, A., Lehtonen, T., & Setänen, S. (2021). Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination and long-term cognitive outcome in children born very preterm. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (8), 947-953. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14873.
Rahlin, M., Rheault, W., & Cech, D. (2003). Evaluation of the primary subtests of toddler and infant motor evaluation: implications for clinical practice in pediatric physical therapy. Pediatr. Phys. Ther., 15 (3), 176-183. DOI: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000083080.76458.78.
Del Rosario, C., Slevin, M., Molloy, E.J., Quigley, J., & Nixon, E. (2021). How to use the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development. Arch. Dis. Child. Educ. Pract. Ed., 106 (2), 108-112. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319063.
Anderson, P.J., & Burnett, A. (2017). Assessing developmental delay in early childhood - concerns with the Bayley-III scales. Clin. Neuropsychol., 31 (2), 371-381. DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1216518.
Lowe, J.R., Erickson, S.J., Schrader, R., & Duncan, A.F. (2012). Comparison of the Bayley II mental developmental index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing? Acta Paediatr., 101 (2), 55-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02517.x.
Harris, S.R., & Daniels, L.E. (2001). Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. J. Pediatr., 139 (2), 249-253. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.115896.
Harris, S.R. (2016). Early identification of motor delay: Family-centred screening tool. Can. Fam. Physician., 62 (8), 629-632.
Holloway, J.M., Long, T.M., & Biasini, F. (2018). Relationships between gross motor skills and social function in young boys with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatr. Phys. Ther., 30 (3), 184-190. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000505.
Karimi, H., Aliabadi, F., Hosseini Jam, M., & Afsharkhas, L. (2016). Evaluation of motor skills in high-risk infants based on Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2). Int. J. Child. Adolesc., 2 (1), 4-7.
Clutterbuck, G.L., Auld, M.L., & Johnston, L.M. (2020). High‐level motor skills assessment for ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and decision tree. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 62 (6), 693-699. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14524.
Tavasoli, A., Azimi, P., & Montazari, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-for assessing motor development of low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatr. Neurol., 51 (4), 522-526. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.06.010.
Wang, M., Mei, H., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Huixian, L.I., & Yan, F. (2017). Application of the Peabody developmental motor scale in the assessment of neurodevelopmental disorders in premature infants. Chin. Pediatr. Emerg. Med., 24 (10), 760-763.
Dourou, E., Komessariou, A., Riga, V., & Lavidas, K. (2017). Assessment of gross and fine motor skills in preschool children using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Instrument. Eur. Psychomotricity J., 9, 89-113.
Wood, E., & Rosenbaum, P. (2000). The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 42 (5), 292-296. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162200000529.
Palisano, R.J., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M.H. (2008). Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 50 (10), 744-750. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x.
Towns, M., Rosenbaum, P., Palisano, R., & Wright, F.V. (2018). Should the Gross Motor Function Classification System be used for children who do not have cerebral palsy? Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 60 (2), 147-154. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13602.
Piscitelli, D., Ferrarello, F., Ugolini, A., Verola, S., & Pellicciari, L. (2021). Measurement properties of the Gross Motor Function Classification System, Gross Motor Function Classification System-Expanded & Revised, Manual Ability Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System in cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (11), 1251-1261. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14910.
Martyniuk, V.Yu. (2014). Diahnostychni kryterii rukhovykh porushen u nemovliat iz pozytsii dokazovoi medytsyny [Diagnostic criteria for motor disorders in infants from the standpoint of evidence-based medicine]. Mizhnarodnyi nevrolohichnyi zhurnal – International Journal of Neurology, 3, 164-165 [in Ukrainian].
Block, R.W., Dreyer, B.P., Cohen, A.R., Stapleton, F.B., Furth, S.L., & Bucciarelli, R.L. (2013). An agenda for children for the 113th Congress: recommendations from the Pediatric Academic Societies. Pediatrics, 131 (1), 109-119. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2661.
Raghupathy, M.K., Rao, B.K., Nayak, S.R., Spittle, A.J., & Parsekar, S.S. (2021). Effect of family-centered care interventions on motor and neurobehavior development of very preterm infants: a protocol for systematic review. Syst. Rev., 10 (1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01612-w.
Shepherd, E., Salam, R.A., Middleton, P., Han, S., Makrides, M., McIntyre, S., …, & Crowther, C.A. (2018). Neonatal interventions for preventing cerebral palsy: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 20, 6. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
Novak, I., Morgan, C., Adde, L., Blackman, J., Boyd, R.N., Brunstrom-Hernandez, J., …, & Badawi, N. (2017). Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA Pediatr., 171 (9), 897-907. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689.
Morgan, C., Fahey, M., Roy, B., & Novak, I. (2018). Diagnosing cerebral palsy in full-term infants. J. Paediatr. Child Health., 54 (10), 1159-1164. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14177.
Campbell, S.K., Wright, B.D., & Linacre, J.M. (2002). Development of a functional movement scale for infants. J. Appl. Meas., 3 (2), 190-204.
Ellison, P.H., Horn, J.L., & Browning, C.A. (1985). Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy. Phys. Ther., 65 (9), 1326-1331. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/65.9.1326.
Liao, W., Wen, E.Y., Li, C., Chang, Q., Lv, K.L., Yang, W., …, & Zhao, C.M. (2012). Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes for at-risk infants: reliability and predictive validity using a Chinese version of the INFANIB at 3, 7 and 10 months. BMC Pediatrics, 12 (1), 72. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-72.
Sung, I.Y., & Kang, W. (1997). Infant neurological international battery (INFANIB) as a predictor of neuromotor outcome in risk infants. J. Korean Acad. Rehab. Med., 21 (2), 406-413.
Fuentefria, R.D.N., Silveira, R.C., & Procianoy, R.S. (2017). Motor development of preterm infants assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: systematic review article. J. Pediatr. (Rio J)., 93 (4), 328-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.03.003.
Campbell, S.K., Kolobe, T.H., Wright, B.D., & Linacre, J.M. (2002). Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 44 (4), 263-272. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201002043.
Piper, M.C., Pinnell, L.E., Darrah, J., Maguire, T., & Byrne, P.J. (1992). Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). J Public Health., 83, 46-50.
Seesahai, J., Luther, M., Church, P.T., Maddalena, P., Asztalos, E., Rotter, T., & Banihani, R. (2021). The assessment of general movements in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, as a predictive tool of cerebral palsy by 2 years of age-a scoping review. Syst. Rev., 10 (1), 226. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01765-8.
Prechtl, H.F. (2001). General movement assessment as a method of developmental neurology: new paradigms and their consequences. The 1999 Ronnie MacKeith lecture. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 43, 836-842. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201001529.
Kwong, A.K.L., Fitzgerald, T.L., Doyle, L.W., Cheong, J.L.Y., & Spittle, A.J. (2018). Predictive validity of spontaneous early infant movement for later cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 60 (5), 480-489. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13697.
Hamer, E.G., Bos, A.F., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2016). Specific characteristics of abnormal general movements are associated with functional outcome at school age. Early Hum. Dev., 95, 9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.01.019.
Campbell, S.K. (2021). Functional movement assessment with the Test of Infant Motor Performance. J. Perinatol., 41 (10), 2385-2394. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01060-3.
Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. (2013). A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 55 (5), 418-426. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12140.
Aizawa, C.Y., Einspieler, C., Genovesi, F.F., Ibidi, S.M., & Hasue, R.H. (2021). The general movement checklist: A guide to the assessment of general movements during preterm and term age. J. Pediatr., 97, 445-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.09.006.
Romeo, D.M., Ricci, D., Brogna, C., & Mercuri, E. (2016). Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 58 (3), 240-245. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12876.
Romeo, D.M., Cowan, F.M., Haataja, L., Ricci, D., Pede, E., Gallini, F., …, & Mercuri, E. (2021). Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination for infants born preterm: predicting outcomes other than cerebral palsy. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (8), 939-946. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14768.
Uusitalo, K., Haataja, L., Nyman, A., Lehtonen, T., & Setänen, S. (2021). Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination and long-term cognitive outcome in children born very preterm. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (8), 947-953. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14873.
Rahlin, M., Rheault, W., & Cech, D. (2003). Evaluation of the primary subtests of toddler and infant motor evaluation: implications for clinical practice in pediatric physical therapy. Pediatr. Phys. Ther., 15 (3), 176-183. DOI: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000083080.76458.78.
Del Rosario, C., Slevin, M., Molloy, E.J., Quigley, J., & Nixon, E. (2021). How to use the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development. Arch. Dis. Child. Educ. Pract. Ed., 106 (2), 108-112. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319063.
Anderson, P.J., & Burnett, A. (2017). Assessing developmental delay in early childhood - concerns with the Bayley-III scales. Clin. Neuropsychol., 31 (2), 371-381. DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1216518.
Lowe, J.R., Erickson, S.J., Schrader, R., & Duncan, A.F. (2012). Comparison of the Bayley II mental developmental index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing? Acta Paediatr., 101 (2), 55-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02517.x.
Harris, S.R., & Daniels, L.E. (2001). Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. J. Pediatr., 139 (2), 249-253. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.115896.
Harris, S.R. (2016). Early identification of motor delay: Family-centred screening tool. Can. Fam. Physician., 62 (8), 629-632.
Holloway, J.M., Long, T.M., & Biasini, F. (2018). Relationships between gross motor skills and social function in young boys with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatr. Phys. Ther., 30 (3), 184-190. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000505.
Karimi, H., Aliabadi, F., Hosseini Jam, M., & Afsharkhas, L. (2016). Evaluation of motor skills in high-risk infants based on Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2). Int. J. Child. Adolesc., 2 (1), 4-7.
Clutterbuck, G.L., Auld, M.L., & Johnston, L.M. (2020). High‐level motor skills assessment for ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and decision tree. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 62 (6), 693-699. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14524.
Tavasoli, A., Azimi, P., & Montazari, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-for assessing motor development of low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatr. Neurol., 51 (4), 522-526. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.06.010.
Wang, M., Mei, H., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Huixian, L.I., & Yan, F. (2017). Application of the Peabody developmental motor scale in the assessment of neurodevelopmental disorders in premature infants. Chin. Pediatr. Emerg. Med., 24 (10), 760-763.
Dourou, E., Komessariou, A., Riga, V., & Lavidas, K. (2017). Assessment of gross and fine motor skills in preschool children using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Instrument. Eur. Psychomotricity J., 9, 89-113.
Wood, E., & Rosenbaum, P. (2000). The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 42 (5), 292-296. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162200000529.
Palisano, R.J., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M.H. (2008). Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 50 (10), 744-750. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x.
Towns, M., Rosenbaum, P., Palisano, R., & Wright, F.V. (2018). Should the Gross Motor Function Classification System be used for children who do not have cerebral palsy? Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 60 (2), 147-154. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13602.
Piscitelli, D., Ferrarello, F., Ugolini, A., Verola, S., & Pellicciari, L. (2021). Measurement properties of the Gross Motor Function Classification System, Gross Motor Function Classification System-Expanded & Revised, Manual Ability Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System in cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol., 63 (11), 1251-1261. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14910.
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2021 Актуальні питання педіатрії, акушерства та гінекології
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
1. Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
2. Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
3. Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).
