Procedure for determining the validation parameter “Linearity /calibration model”of analytical methodology of quantitative determination of some antihypertensive analyts in biological liquids for pharmacokinetic studies

Authors

  • L. S. Logoyda I. Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/mcch.2410-681X.2018.v0.i2.9141

Keywords:

amlodipine, bisoprolol, enalapril, validation, “linearity/calibration model”.

Abstract

Introduction. To study the pharmacokinetics of medicines, the most relevant is the development of bioanalytical methods of analysis. However, in order to increase the effectiveness of the pharmacotherapy of any disease, including hypertension, several medicines are prescribed at the same time, or multicomponent medicines are the subject of study, so it is expedient to develop a bioanalytical method for the simultaneous determination of several analytes, and sometimes in the present of their metabolites, in the human plasma.

The aim of the study – to conduct an experimental study of validation parameter “linearity/calibration model” for quantitative determination of amlodipine, bisoprolol and enalapril in human plasma for pharmacokinetic studies.

Research Methods. The bioanalytical method for the determination of amlodipine, bisoprolol and enalapril is based on HPLC/MS/MS analysis of analytes in investigated solutions obtained from plasma samples after preprecipitation of proteins.

Results and Discussion. A linear relationship was found between the concentration and the chromatographic peaks of amlodirine, bisoprolol and enalapril in the range of concentrations of 0.1–10 ng/ml, 0.5–50 ng/ml and 5–500 ng/ml, respectively.

Conclusion. The conclusion regarding the developed methodology according to the validation parameter “linearity/calibration model” is correct.

References

Braggio, S., Barnaby, R.J., Grosi, P., & Cugola, M. (1996). A strategy for validation of bioanalytical methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 14 (4), 375-388.

Singh, U.K., Pandey, P., & Keshri, P.K. (2000). Bioanlytical method development and validation. J. Biorg. Chem., 2, 34-45.

Causon, R. (1997). Validation of chromatographic methods in biomedical analysis viewpoint and discussion. J. Chromatogr. B., 689 (1), 175-180.

Sharma, A., & Rathore, S. (2012). Bioanalytical method development and validation of drugs in biological fluid. Int. J. of Pharm & Research Sci., 1 (4), 216-226.

James, C.A., Breda, M., & Frigerio, E. (2004). Bioanalytical method validation: a risk-based approach. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 35 (4), 887-889.

Murugan, S., Pravallika, N., Sirisha, P., & Chandrakala, K. (2013). Bioanalytical method development and validation by using Lc-Ms/Ms. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6 (1), 41-45.

(2013). Validatsiya bioanaliticheskogo metoda: metod. rekomendatsii [Validation of the bioanalytical method: method. Recommendations]. Kiev [in Russian].

Logoyda, L., Korobko, D., & Kovalenko, S. (2018). The methods for determination of combination antihypertensive drugs in human plasma by HPLC MS/MS. 23nd Dubai International Pharmaceuticals & Technologies

Conference & Exhibition, February 27 – March 01, 2018. Dubai. Л

Published

2018-07-03

How to Cite

Logoyda, L. S. (2018). Procedure for determining the validation parameter “Linearity /calibration model”of analytical methodology of quantitative determination of some antihypertensive analyts in biological liquids for pharmacokinetic studies. Medical and Clinical Chemistry, (2), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.11603/mcch.2410-681X.2018.v0.i2.9141

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS