RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF SUCCESS RATE OF DENTAL IMPLANTS INSTALLED IN THE AREA OF BONE AUGMENTATION WITH THE USE OF AUTOGENIC AND ALLOGENIC BLOCKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2018.v0.i2.8586Keywords:
implants, sucсess, bone augmentation.Abstract
The dynamics and features of remodeling bone blocks of different origin can directly influence the results of dental implants success and survival installed in the area of augmentation, therefore the study of the latter indicators is an important aspect in planning and predicting the effects of iatrogenic interventions.
The aim of the study – to analyze the parameters of the success among installed dental implants in the sites of jaw bone augmentation, which was carried out using bone blocks of autogenic and allogeneic origin, according to data from previous studies.
Material and Methods. The study was conducted in accordance to the recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of clinical trials assessing the results of iatrogenic interventions and are covered in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (http://www.prisma-statement.org). In order to select publications that are potentially relevant to the purpose and focus of the study, an electronic search of such electronic databases as MEDLINE® / PubMed®, Cochrane CENTRAL and Ovid MEDLINE was carried out. The search for electronic databases was performed according to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) descriptors.
Results. Taking into account the data obtained during the analysis of the publication and the main purpose of the study, the results can be grouped according to the following categories: the success of the implants installed in the autologous bone blocks was: 93.0–98.5 % (according to monitoring data of 368 implants), 99.2 % (according to monitoring data of 525 implants), 94.11 % (according to monitoring data of 45 implants), 95.2 % (according to 21 implant monitoring data), 86.9–90 % (according to monitoring data of 43 implants), 83.3–96.9 % (according to monitoring data of 53 implants), 94.1 % (according to monitoring data, 162 implants) 96.4 % (according to monitoring data 54 implants); the success of implants installed in allogenic bone blocks: 96 % (according to the monitoring data of 287 implants), 95.5 % (according to monitoring data of 90 implants), 98 % (according to monitoring data of 63 implants).
Conclusion. During the analysis of publications, it was noted that the success rates of implants depend not only on the selected material for augmentation (its origin), but also on a number of other parameters such as the region of augmentation, the load period, the period of the implant installation in relation to the time of the residual ridge reconstruction, the topography of the surgical area, the time of observation, the criteria that were selected to assess the success rate. In particular, when the observation period was lengthened, a decrease in the success rate of implantation was noted, although this parameter generally did not depend on the number of primary samples of installed implants, on which further monitoring was carried out.
References
Aloja, E.D., Ricci, M., Caso, G., Santi, E., Paolo, T., Antono, B., & Covani, U. (2013). The use of bone block allografts in sinus augmentation, followed by delayed implant placement: A case series. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 4 (1), 13.
Aloy-Prósper, A., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2015). The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal., 20 (2), e251-258.
Carini, F., Longoni, S., Amosso, E., Paleari, J., Carini, S., & Porcaro, G. (2014). Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review. Annali di Stomatologia, 5 (2), 27.
Carini, F., Longoni, S., Pisapia, V., Francesconi, M., Saggese, V., & Porcaro, G. (2014). Immediate loading of implants in the aesthetic zone: comparison between two placement timings. Annali di Stomatologia, 5 (2 2), 15.
Clementini, M., Morlupi, A., Agrestini, C., & Barlattani, A. (2009). Success rate of dental implants inserted in autologous bone graft regenerated areas: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20 (9), 987.
Clementini, M., Morlupi, A., Agrestini, C., & Ottria, L. (2011). Success rate of dental implants inserted in autologous bone graft regenerated areas: a systematic review. Oral Implantol. (Rome), 4 (3-4), 3-10.
Felice, P., Cannizzaro, G., Barausse, C., Pistilli, R., & Esposito, M. (2014). Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up. Eur. J. Oral Implantol., 7 (4), 359-369.
Kang, Y.H., Kim, H.M., Byun, J.H., Kim, U.K., Sung, I.Y., Cho, Y.C., & Park, B.W. (2015). Stability of simultaneously placed dental implants with autologous bone grafts harvested from the iliac crest or intraoral jaw bone. BMC Oral Health, 15 (1), 172.
Misch, C.E., & Dietsh, F. (1993). Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry, 2 (3), 158-166.
Misch, C.E., Perel, M.L., Wang, H.L., Sammartino, G., Galindo-Moreno, P., Trisi, P., ... & Schwartz-Arad, D. (2008). Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) pisa consensus conference. Implant Dentistry, 17 (1), 5-15.
Motamedian, S.R., Khojaste, M., & Khojasteh, A. (2016). Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: a systematic literature review. Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 6 (1), 78.
Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C.J., Singh, M., Weber, H.P., & Gallucci, G.O. (2012). Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Research, 91 (3), 242-248.
Pjetursson, B.E., Tan, W.C., Zwahlen, M., & Lang, N.P. (2008). A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35 (s8), 216-240.
Sakkas, A., Wilde, F., Heufelder, M., Winter, K., & Schramm, A. (2017). Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology - is it still a “gold standard”? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 3 (1), 23.
