LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY: ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST OPERATIONS

Authors

  • A. D. Bedeniuk I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • Y. M. Grytsenko I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • I. Ya. Dzyubanovsky I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • V. V. Zaporozhets I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • O. M. Gusak I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • O. V. Kit I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • S. Y. Gritsenko I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • S. S. Stefanchuk I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2022.v.i3.13280

Keywords:

laparoscopic surgery, colorectal cancer

Abstract

SUMMARY. The aim – to analyze the initial experience of the introduction of laparoscopic technologies in the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Material and Methods. Our experience in performing laparoscopic operations includes 5 patients (2 men and 3 women) on CRC who underwent laparoscopic operations in the Ternopil Regional Clinical Hospital from December 2021 to May 2022. The mean age of patients was 62±7.84 (range 59–74). All patients underwent preoperative 3D-CT angiography and vascular anatomy of the mesentery. 3 patients had previously undergone surgery and had a connective tissue laparoscopic viscerolysis. In 2 patients, the tumor grew into the lateral abdominal wall, pelvic lateral wall and loop of the small intestine, respectively, combined operations were performed.

Results. The average blood loss was 120±77.3 ml (range 50–250 ml). Intraoperative time was 235±46.18 minutes (interval 180–300 minutes). The average number of removed lymph nodes was 13±2.34 (range 12–17). According to the TNM classification, stage T1 was detected in 1 patient, T2 – 1, T3 – 3, T4a – 1, T4b – 1. Three patients were diagnosed with a high (G1) degree of adenocarcinoma differentiation, while a low (G3) degree was diagnosed in 2 patients. Metastasis to regional lymph nodes were detected in 2 patients. In 3 cases the specimen was removed through a 4 cm Pphanenstil incision, in 1 case through a 5 cm incision above the navel and in 1 case through access in the left mesogastric region, where a sigmostoma was subsequently formed. A protective sleeve was used during the extraction of the specimen. We did not observe any cases of anastomosis leakage or 30-day mortality. In 1 patient the postoperative period was complicated by the development of pseudomembranous colitis. R0 resection was achieved in all patients.

References

Kim, Woo, Kang, Sung-Bum, & Lee, Soo-Young (2013). Early rehabilitation programs after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Evidence and criticism. World J. Gastroenterol., 19(46), 8543-8551.

Kaiser, M Andreas (2014). Evolution and future of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J. Gastroenterol., 20(41), 15119-15124. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15119.

Kim, Duck-Woo, Kang, Sung-Bum, Lee, Soo-Young, Oh, Heung-Kwon, & In, Myung-Hoon. (2013). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J. Gastroenterol., 19(46), 8543-8551. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8543.

Kulkarni, N., & Arulampalam. T. (2020). Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of surgical site infections compared to the open approach for colorectal procedures: a meta analysis. Tech. Coloproctol. 24(10), 1017-1024. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02293-8.

Grytsenko, S., Dzyubanovsky, I., Hrytsenko, I., & Bedeniuk, A. (2022). Multidisciplinary personalized approach to D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of left colic artery in patients with left sided colorectal cancer: surgical and radiological point of view. Minerva Surgery. 4. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5691.21.09148-6.

Published

2022-11-14

How to Cite

Bedeniuk, A. D., Grytsenko, Y. M., Dzyubanovsky, I. Y., Zaporozhets, V. V., Gusak, O. M., Kit, O. V., … Stefanchuk, S. S. (2022). LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY: ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST OPERATIONS. Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, (3), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2022.v.i3.13280

Issue

Section

Оригінальні дослідження