CLINICAL CASE OF ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF TRACHEAL FIBROMA

Authors

  • V. V. Malovanyy I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • L. E. Viytovych I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • M. V. Sanotska I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2020.v.i3.11593

Keywords:

tracheal fibroma, differential diagnosis, endoscopic removal

Abstract

The incidence of primary tracheal tumors is less than 0.1 %. Тhey are often misdiagnosed as asthma or chronic lung disease and can delay treatment for months or years.

The following case of tracheal fibroma can be considered as a clinical example. The 40-year-old patient was referred to the Pulmonology Department of the Ternopil University Hospital with a diagnosis of severe refractory bronchial asthma. Despite intensive anti-asthmatic treatment, there was a gradual deterioration in spirometry. To clarify the diagnosis, the patient underwent computed tomography of the chest and found a tumor-like formation in the lumen of the trachea. The patient, diagnosed with a tumor of the trachea, was urgently referred to the Department of Thoracic Surgery for further diagnosis and treatment. Surgical treatment was performed using a flexible fibrobronchoscope under local anesthesia. An endoscopic diathermic loop was applied to the base of the tumor through the bronchoscope canal. The Olympus UES-30 electrosurgical apparatus was used for clipping in the serial coagulation mode of 30 W and in the cutting mode of 25 W. The tumor adhered to the endoscopic loop and was removed together with the bronchoscope.

Postoperative course without complications, during the observation period there were no attacks of shortness of breath, normalized spirometry.

Conclusions. The low frequency of clinical cases of tracheal neoplasms in the practice of a physician of therapeutic profile leads to low vigilance regarding this pathology. Difficulties in diagnosis are due to the low informativeness of the clinical picture at the stage of initial symptoms. Timely diagnosis allows endoscopic intervention and complete recovery of the patient.

References

Ahn, Y., Chang, N., & Lim, Y.S. (2009). Primary tracheal tumors: review of 37 cases. Thorac. Oncol., 4 (5), 635-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31819d18f9

Park, J.S., Lee, M., Kim, H.K., Choi, Y.S., Kim, K., & Kim, J. (2012). Primary leiomyoma of the trachea, bronchus, and pulmonary parenchyma – a single-institutional experience. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 41 (1), 41-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.051

Macchiarini, P. (2006) Primary tracheal tumours. Lancet Oncol., 7 (1), 83-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70541-6

Sutejda, G. & Bolliger, C.T. (2000). Endobronchial electrocautery and argon plasma coagulation. Interventional Bronchoscopy, 4 (15), 2-14.

Halak, M.Y., & Melnik, O.M. (2011). Nash opyt diagnostiki i lecheniya fibrom trahei [Our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of tracheal fibroids]. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik – Tavrichesky Medico-biological Bulletin, 4 (14), 210-212 [in Russian].

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Malovanyy, V. V., Viytovych, L. E., & Sanotska, M. V. (2020). CLINICAL CASE OF ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF TRACHEAL FIBROMA. Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, (3), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.11603/1811-2471.2020.v.i3.11593

Issue

Section

Оригінальні дослідження