ASPECT OF MODERN METHODS OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS DIAGNOSTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2017.4.8275Keywords:
choledocholithiasis, diagnostics, instrumental methods.Abstract
Choledocholithiasis is a common surgical pathology and main cause of nonmalignant obstructive diseases of biliary system. Estimation of the safest method of diagnostics allows reducing the frequency of complications, accuracy of diagnostics and
unnecessary economic expenses.
The aim of the study – to determine the most optimal methods for diagnosing choledocholithiasis on the basis of the analysis of literature data.
Materials and Methods. According to the data of literature for 5-year period, the experience of diagnostics of choledocholithiasis has been analyzed. Comparative analysis of different instrumental methods of diagnostics of choledocholithiasis has been performed.
Results and Discussion. For now there is no final decision about certain method of choledocholithiasis diagnostics. Different researches show ambiguous data of sensitivity and specificity of both invasive and non-invasive techniques.
Conclusions. Scientific experience shows, that non-invasive diagnostic methods of choledocholithiasis and more perspective due to the absence of surgical intervention, complications and wide spectrum of possibilities of their improving. It is noteworthy, that prevalent are magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound diagnostics, which are the most informative and highly specific diagnostic methods with less quantity of complications.
References
Kang, S.K., Heacock, L. Doshi, A.M., Ream, J.R., Sun, J., & Babb, J.S. (2017). Comparative performance of non–contrast MRI with HASTE vs. contrast–enhanced MRI/3D–MRCP for possible choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients. Abdom. Radiol. (NY), (42), 6, 1650-1658.
Costi, R., Gnocchi, A. Di Mario, F. & Sarli, L. (2014). Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World. J. Gastroenterol, (20), 37, 13382-13401.
Stephen T., & Kayleen, J. (2016). Noninvasive Imaging of the Biliary System Relevant to Percutaneous Interventions. Semin. Intervent. Radiol., (33), 4, 277-282.
Patel, R., Ingle, M., Choksi, D. Poddar, P., Pandey, V., & Sawant, P. (2017). Endoscopic Ultrasonography Can Prevent Unnecessary Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Even in Patients with High Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis and Inconclusive Ultrasonography: Results of a Prospective Study. ClinEndosc.
Copelan, A. & Kapoor, B.S. (2015). Choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis and Management. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., (18), 4, 244-255.
Cai, J.S., Qiang, S. & Bao–Bing, Y. (2017). Advances of recurrent risk factors and management of choledocholithiasis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (52), 1, 34-43.
Dziubanovskyi, O.I. (2017). Klinichni formy kholedokholitiazu [Clinical forms of choledocholitiasis]. Visnyk naukovykh doslidzhen – Bulletin of scientific research, 1, 77-80 [In Ukrainian]. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2017.1.7569
Kang, S.K., Hoffman, D., Ferket, B., Kim, M.I. & Braithwaite, S.R. (2017). Risk–stratified versus Non–Risk–stratified diagnostic testing for management of suspected acute biliary obstruction: comparative effectiveness, costs, and the role of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology, (284), 2, 468-461.
Gurusamy, K.S., Giljaca, V., Takwoingi, Y., Higgie, D., Poropat, G., Štimac, D. & Davidson, B.R. (2015). Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2, CD011548.
Petrescu, I., Bratu, A.M. Petrescu, S., Popa, B.V., Cristian, D., & Burcos, T. (2015). CT vs. MRCP in choledocholithiasis jaundice. J. Med. Life, (8), 2, 226-231.
Savoliuk, S.I. & Svyrydiuk, B.V. (2016). Diahnostychnyi alhorytm u khvorykh iz hostrym kalkuloznym kholetsystytom ta pidozroiu na kholedokholitiaz [Diagnostic algorithm for patients with an acute calculary cholecystitis and suspicion on choledocholithiasis]. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L. Ia. Kovalchuka – Hospital Surgery. Journal named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, 4, 33-36 [In Ukrainian]. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2016.4.7183
Makmun, D., Fauzi, A. & Shatri, H. (2017). Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledocholithiasis: the Indonesian experience. ClinEndosc. doi:10.5946/ce.2016.159.
Tazuma, S., Unno, M., Igarashi, Y., Inui, K., Uchiyama, K., Kai, M., … Tsuyuguchi, T. (2017). Evidence–based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J. Gastroenterol, (52), 3, 276-300.
Karki, S., Joshi, K.S., Regmi, S., Gurung, R.B. & Malla, B. (2013). Role of ultrasound as compared with ERCP in patient with obstructive jaundice. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ), (11), 43, 237-240.
Fargo, M.V., Grogan, S. P. & Saguil, A. (2017). Evaluation of Jaundice in Adults. Am. Fam. Physician, (95), 3, 164-168.
Jeon, T.J. Cho, J.H. & Kim, Y.S. Song, S.Y. & Park, J.Y. (2017). Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in symptomatic patients with high and intermediate probabilities of common bile duct stones and a negative computed tomography scan. Gut. Liver, (11), 2, 290-297.
Molvar, C. & Glaenzer, B. (2016). Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation, Treatment, and Outcomes. Semin. Intervent. Radiol., (33), 4, 268-276.
Chang, J.H., Lee, I.S., Lim, Y.S., Jung, S.H., Paik, C.N., Kim, H.K., … Kim, T.H. (2012). Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP. Scand J. Gastroenterol, (47), 2, 217-224.
Badger, W.R., Borgert, A.J. Kallies, K.J., & Kothari, S.N. (2017). Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review. Am. J. Surg., (214), 2, 251-255.
Saito, H., Kakuma, T., Kadono, Y., Urata, A., Kamikawa, K., Imamura, H. & Tada Sh. (2017). Increased risk and severity of ERCP–related complications associated with asymptomatic common bile duct stones. Endosc. Int. Open, (5), 9, 809-817.
Kolomiitsev, V.I, Palamarchuk, Yu.O, Dovhan, Yu.P. & Zhemela, V.H. (2013). Porivnialnyi analiz vykorystannia riznykh metodiv promenevoi diahnostyky kholedokholitiazu. Ukrainskyi radiolohichnyi zhurnal, 21 (4), 390-9 [In Ukrainian].
Lan Cheong Wah D., Christophi, C. & Muralidharan, V. (2017). Acute cholangitis: current concepts. ANZ. J. Surg., (87), 7-8, 554-559.
Qiu, Y., Yang, Z., Li, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, W. & Xue, D. (2015). Is preoperative MRCP necessary for patients with gallstones? An analysis of the factors related to missed diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by preoperative ultrasound. BMC. Gastroenterol, (15), 158.
Mandelia, A., Gupta, A.K., Verma, D.K. & Sharma, S. (2013). The value of magnetic resonance cholangio–pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocholithiasis. J ClinDiagn Res., (7), 9, 1941-1945.
Polistina, F.A., Frego, M., Bisello, M., Manzi, E., Vardanega, A. & Perin, B. (2015). Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature. World J Radiol., (7), 4, 70-78.
Nychytailo, M.Iu., Buryi, O.M., Shcherbina, S.I., Tereshkevych, I.S., Bulyk, I.I. & Deinichenko, A.H. (2013). Otsinka metodu endosonohrafii u khvorykh za pomirnoho ryzyku kholedokholitiazu [Assessment of endosonography in patients with moderate risk of choledocholithiasis]. Klinichna khirurhiia – Clinical Surgery, 5-8 [In Ukrainian].
Choi, I.Y., Yeom, S.K., Cha, S.H., Lee, S.H., Chung, H.H., Hyun, J.J., … Kim, B.H. (2014). Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1–weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd–EOB–DTPA versus T2–weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. Clin Imaging, (38), 2, 164-169.
Ivanko, O.V., Svyrydiuk, B.V. & Boris, R.A. (2016). Mahnitno–rezonansna kholanhiopankreatohrafiia v diahnostytsi hostroho kholetsystytu, yakyi uskladnenyi kholedokholitiazom [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, which is complicated by choledocholithiasis]. Fitoterapiia. Chasopys – Phytotherapy. Journal, 2, 35-38 [In Ukrainian].
Meeralam, Y., Al–Shammari, K. & Yaghoobi, M. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta–analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head–to–head studies. Gastrointest. Endosc. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.009.
Karamanos, E., Inaba, K., Berg, R.J., Resnick, S., Okoye, O., Alexopoulos, S. … Chouliaras, K. (2017). The relationship between age, common bile duct diameter and diagnostic probability in suspected choledocholithiasis. Dig. Surg., (34), 5, 421-428.
D'Angelo, T., Racchiusa, S., Mazziotti, S. & Cicero, G. (2017). Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography demonstration of the cystic duct entering the right hepatic duct. Am. J. Case. Rep., (18), 242-245.
Adler, D.G., Cox, K., Milliken, M., Taylor, L.J., Loren,D., Kowalski T. … Francis, G. (2015). Alarge multicenter study analysis of adverse events associated with single operator cholangiopancreatoscopy. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol, (61), 4, 179-184.
Quispel, Rutger, van Driel, Lydi M.W.J., Veldt, Bart J., van Haard, Paul M.M. & Bruno, Marco J. Less (2016). The utility and yield of endoscopic ultrasonography for suspected choledocholithiasis in common gastroenterology practice. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., (28), 12, 1473-1476.
Gurusamy, K.S., Giljaca, V., Takwoingi, Y., Higgie, D., Poropat, G., Štimac, D. & Davidson, B.R. (2015). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2:CD010339.
Li, H., He, D., Lao, Q., Chen, X, Liu, M, Yin, B, … Zhao, K. (2015). Clinical value of spectral CT in diagnosis of negative gallstones and common bile duct stone. Abdom. Imaging, (40), 6, 1587-1594.
Chen, C.C. (2012 ). The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones as compared to CT, MRCP, and ERCP. J. Chin. Med. Assoc., (75), 7, 301-302.
Cost–effective decisions in detecting silent common bile duct gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy / Sun, S. X., Kulaylat, A. N., Hollenbeak, C. S. & Soybel, D.I. (2016). Ann. Surg., (263), 6, 1164-1172.
Epelboym, I., Winner, M., & Allendorf, J.D. (2013). MRCP is not a cost–effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones. J. Gastrointest. Surg., (17), 5, 863-871.
Vargas, R.D., Córdoba, C.P., Uriza, L.F. & Ortega, D.A. (2015). Correlation between cholangiopancreatography by magnetic resonance and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in hospitalized by biliary lithiasis in the University Hospital San Ignacio (Bogota–Colombia) between 2005 to 2011. Rev. Gastroenterol. Peru., (35), 3, 226-230.
Arrivé, L., Hodoul, M., Arbache, A., Slavikova-Boucher, L., Menu, Y. & El Mouhadi, S. (2015). Magnetic resonance cholangiography: Current and future perspectives. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol., (39), 6, 659-664.
A. Chandra, V. Gupta, R. Rahul, Kumar, M., Maurya, A. (2017.). Intraoperative ultrasonography of the biliary tract using saline as a contrast agent: a fast and accurate technique to identify complex biliary anatomy. Can. J. Surg., (60), 5, 316-322.
M. B. Wallace, K. K. Wang, D. G. Adler Rastogi, A. (2017). Recent Advances in Endoscopy. Gastroenterology, (153), 2, 364-381.
Abdelaal, A., El–Matbouly, M., Sulieman, I., Elfaki, A., El-Bakary, T., Abdelaziem, S., … Gehani, S. (2017). Role of intraoperative cholangiography for detecting residual stones after biliary pancreatitis: still useful? A retrospective study. World J. Emerg. Surg., (12), 18. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0130-9
Williams, E., Beckingham, I., El Sayed, G., Gurusamy, K., Sturgess, R., Webster, G. & Young, T. (2017). Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) Gut, (66), 5, 765-782.
Qiu, W., Sun, X.D., Wang, G.Y., Zhang, P., Du, X.H., Lv, G.Y. (2015). The clinical efficacy of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy for cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci., (19), 19, 3649-3654.
ElGeidie, A., Atif, E., Naeem, Y. & ElEbidy, G. (2015). Laparoscopic bile duct clearance without choledochoscopy. SurgLaparoscEndoscPercutan Tech., (25), 5, 152-155.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who sent their manuscript to "Вісник наукових досліджень. Bulletin of Scientific Research" Surgery agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
