ASTHENOPIA FEATURES AND ITS DIAGNOSIS

Authors

  • I. M. Boichuk V. Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Odessa
  • V. A. Naumenko V. P. Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odessa
  • O. V. Zborovska V. P. Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odessa
  • O. E. Dorokhova V. P. Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odessa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2019.1.10003

Keywords:

asthenopia, accommodation, convergence, binocular vision, fusion, phoria

Abstract

Every year, due to technical progress, more and more new technologies and devices for their realization are emerging, computer technologies are firmly included in various spheres of human life, as well as in its life. Participation in the labor process requires the implementation of a wide range of visual tasks. Many professions are connected with the strong, and most importantly, the unusual tension of physiological functions, under which conditions of work can be characterized as extreme (production of electronic equipment, micro devices, computer equipment and work on them).

The aim of the study – to identify the features of asthenopia in young people who were referring to the clinic for 3 years.

Materials and Methods. 275 (540 eyes) of young people 20–28 years old were observed. Patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination: visometry into the near and far distance, refractometry, detection of accommodation reserves, accommodation store, the nearest point of convergence, binocular vision characteristics, fusion ability, phoria on Maddox scale by generally accepted methods. Patients who had comlaints on the “darkening in the eyes”, the “disappearance of the letters during reading”, photophobia and headache were necessarily assigned to the Dopplerography of the vessels of the head and neck, and to the additional examination of: neurologist, psychoneurologist, otolaringologist.

Results and Discussion. We established that the accommodative form of asthenopia occurs most frequently – in 45 % of cases, muscular – in 30 % of cases, and the nervous form in 25 % of cases.

Сonclusions. Each form of asthenopia has its own symptomatic complex of visual, binocular and neurovascular disorders: a) for accommodative – a slight degree of reduction of visual acuity in the distance and near, a decrease in the reserves of absolute and relative accommodation, an adequate level of fusion and convergence; b) for the muscular form – a slight reduction in visual acuity in the far and near distance, a slight decrease in the reserves of absolute and relative accommodation, a remoteness of the nearest point of convergence, a decrease in the fusion amplitude and presence of exophoria of moderate severity; c) for the nervous form – a mild form of reducing visual acuity in the far and near distance, a pronounced decrease in the reserves of absolute and relative accommodation, a pronounced remoteness of the nearest point of convergence and a significant decrease in the amplitude of the fusion, as well as the presence of adaptation disorders.

References

Anochin, P.K. (1969). Sistemnaya organizasia zritelnich funksiy [Systemic organization of visual functions]. Moskow, Nauka, p. 444 [in Russian].

Schapovalov, S.L., Milyavskaya, T.N., & Evseev, E.A. (1989). Lazernie spektri v diagnostike i professionalnoi reabilitasii v grazhdanskoy aviasii [Laser speckles in diagnostics and vocational rehabilitation in civil aviation]. Moskow, Vozduchniy transport, p. 46 [in Russin].

Ovechkin, I.G., Belyakin, S.A., & Maniso O.M. (2003). Profilaktika i korreksia funksionalnikh rasstroystv zrenia v sootvetstvii s bazovymi polozheniami konsepsii okhrany zdorovya v RF [Prevention and correction of functional disorders of vision in accordance with the basic provisions of the concept of health protection in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik vosstanovitelnoy medicine – Bulletin of restorative medicine, 2, 7-8 [in Russian].

Arutynova, O.V., Ovechkin, I.G., Manyko, O.M., & Pasechniy, S.N. (2002). Rol lazernykh metodov v fizioterapevticheskom lechenii anomalii refraksii [The role of laser methods in the physiotherapeutic treatment of refractive errors]. Trudy V Vserossiyskogo syezda fizioterapevtov I kulturologov. Moskow, p. 255-256 [in Russian].

Hedman, L.R., & Briem, V. (1984) Short-term changes in eyetrain of VDU users as a function if age. Hum. Factors, 26 (3), 357-370.

Reddy, S.C., Low, C.K., Lim, Y.P., Low, L.L., Mardina, F., & Nursaleha, M.P. (2013). Computer vision syndrome: a study of knowledge and practices in university students. Nepal J Ophthalmol., 5 (2), 161-168. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v5i2.8707.

Greenhous, D.S., Bailey, I.L., Howarth, P.A., & Berman, M. (1989). Spatial adaptation on video display terminals .Soc. of Photo-Optical Instrumintation Engeineers, 1077, 27-34.

Avetisov, E.S., Rozenblum, Y.Z., & Urmacher, L.S. (1988). Ophtalmoergonomika i optometria. Itogi i perspective issledovaniy, provodimykh v Institute glaznykh bolezney im. Gelmgolza. [Ophthalmoergonomics and optometry. Results and prospects of research conducted at the Helmholtz Institute of Eye Diseases]. Ophtalmoergonomika i optometria, Moskow, p. 7-28 [in Russian].

Somov, E.E. (1979). Zritelnaya rabotosposobnost I metodi ee issledovania. Oftalmoergonomika operatorskoy deyatelnosti [Visual performance and methods of its research. Ophthalmoergonomics of operator activity (report of the symposium)]. Abstracts of Papers, Leningrad, p. 47-49 [in Russian].

Nyman, K.Y. (1986). Refraction in VDU operators- a comparison with other professions. Work Display Units. Select. Pap. [1st. Int. Sci. Conf., Stockholm, May 12- 15]. Amsterdam, p. 512-513.

Ishikawa, S. (1990). Examination of the near triad in VDT operators. Ergonomics, 25 (6), 787-798.

Wright, I. (1986). Identification and prevrntioin of work-related mental and psychosomatic disorders among two categories of VDU users. Proceedings of an International Scientific Conference: Work with Display Units, 12-15 May. Stockholm, p. 308-310.

Zavorotnaya, S.V., Ovechkin, I.G., Antonyk, V.D., Klyvaeva, T.Y., & Schevkunova, S.A. (2003). Funksionalnaya korrecsia sindroma zritelnoy astenopii v vostanovitelnoy medicine I ophtalmoergonomike [Functional correction of visual astenopia syndrome in restorative medicine and ophthalmoergonomics]. Vestnik vosstanovitelnoy medicine – Bulletin of restorative medicine, 4, 37-40 [in Russian].

Kovalenko, V.V. (1986). O putyach dalneychego razvitia oftalmoergonomiki [On the ways of further development of ophthalmoergonomics]. Ofhtalmologicheskiy jurnal – Oftalm. journals, 8 (288), 449-451 [in Russian].

Schevkunova, S.A. (2003). Sindrom zritelnoy astenopii chrezvichaynoy situasii – diagnostika, profilactika, korreksia. Novie technologii vosstanovitelnoy medicine [Emergency visual asthenopia” syndrome - diagnosis, prevention, correction]. Proceedings of the IX International Symposium. Marokko, p. 138-140 [in Russian].

Schostak, V.I. (1979). Metodicheskie prinsipi diagnostiki zritelnogo utomlenia. Ophtalmoergonomika operatorskoy deyatelnosti [Methodological principles for the diagnosis of visual fatigue. Ophthalmoergonomics of operator activity (abstracts of the symposium)]. Abstracts of Papers. Leningrad, p. 50-52 [in Russian].

Published

2019-04-15

How to Cite

Boichuk, I. M., Naumenko, V. A., Zborovska, O. V., & Dorokhova, O. E. (2019). ASTHENOPIA FEATURES AND ITS DIAGNOSIS. Bulletin of Scientific Research, (1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2019.1.10003

Issue

Section

SURGERY