PERSONALITY BIOETHICS IN LEGISLATIVE REGULATION OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE

Authors

  • Т. І. Tolokova "SHEI Ternopil State Medical University named after I.J. Gorbachevskyi Ministry of Health of Ukraine"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2015.1.4694

Keywords:

assisted reproductive technologies, the status of the embryo, NaProTechnologies, infertility.

Abstract

Purpose: the formation of knowledge on the ethical and legal documents that protect the individual, society and humanity as a whole from unwanted and harmful effects of implementation in practice of new biomedical technologies.

Materials and methods. By means of bibliographic and hermeneutical methods analysis of standard documents and ethical acts is carried out.

Results. Scientific researches of the biological nature of human embryo testify that from the moment of fertilisation the embryo has all characteristics of human being. It predetermines necessity of legislative regulation of auxiliary reproductive technologies and their alternative - NaProTehnologiyi for the decision of infertility problems, the relation to the status of an embryo of the person as to the human person allocated with human advantage, which from the moment of fertilisation is reputable.

Conclusions. In the modern health care system there is need to review existing legislation through the understanding of the basic principles of personalistic bioethics on interferences in the human body, in particular for solving problems of infertility.

References

Bioetyka : pidr. / Z·hrechcha E., Spanʹyolo A. Dzh., Pʺyetro M. L. di [ta in.]; per. z ital. V. Y. Shovkun. – L. : Vydavnytstvo LOBF «Medytsyna i pravo», 2007.

Blekhshmidt E. Zberezhennya indyvidualʹnosti. Lyudyna – osoba vid samoho pochatku. Dani embriolohiyi lyudyny / E. Blekhshmidt. – L., 2003. – 120 s.

Kostin I. Deyaki pytannya pravovoho rehulyuvannya reproduktyvnoho zaplidnennya / I. Kostin, O. Bondar // Ukr. med. chasop. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 52–53.

Ovchynnykova M. B. Tekhnyka zhyzny, kotoraya vedet k smerty / M. B. Ovchynnykova. – M. : Favor, 2002. – 352 s.

Pro zatverdzhennya Instruktsiyi pro poryadok zastosuvannya dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohiy №771 vid 23.12.2008 r. : nakaz MOZ Ukrayiny [Elektronnyy dokument]. – Rezhym dostupu : http://www.moz.gov.ua. – Nazva z ekranu.

Pro zatverdzhennya umov i poryadku zastosuvannya shtuchnoho zaplidnennya ta implantatsiyi embriona (embrioniv) i metodiv yikh provedennya : nakaz MOZ Ukrayiny №24 vid 04.02.1997 r. [Elektronnyy dokument]. – Rezhym dostupu : http://www.moz.gov.ua. – Nazva z ekranu.

Syluyanova Y. Étyka vrachevanyya / Y. Syluyanova. – M. : Yzd-vo Mosk. Podvorʹe Svyato-Troytskoy Serhyevoy Lavry, 2001. – 319 s.

Simeynyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 10.01.2002 r. (№ 2947) // VVR №21-22.

Sudo ZH. Semʹya y byoétyka. Materyaly mezhdunarodnoho sympozyuma / ZH. Sudo. – SPb : Mart, 1998. – S. 115–145.

Tereshkevych H. T. Bioetyka v systemi okhorony zdorovʺya i medychnoyi osvity: navch. posibn. / H. T. Tereshkevych. – L. : Svit, 2008. – 344 s.

Tsyvilʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 16.10.2003 r. (№ 435-IV) // VVR. – № 40 — 43/203.

Congregazione рer Dottrina della Fede. Istruzione Donum Vitae (22 febbraio 1987). — Città del Vaticano, 1987. – 168 p.

Giovanni Paolo II. Lettera Enciclica Evangelium Vitae (25 marzo 1995). — Città del Vaticano, 1995. – 190 p.

Grange D. L’enfant derriere la vitre / D. Grange. – Paris : Encre, 1987. – 288 p.

Published

2015-06-26

How to Cite

Tolokova Т. І. (2015). PERSONALITY BIOETHICS IN LEGISLATIVE REGULATION OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE. Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine, (1). https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2015.1.4694

Issue

Section

Discussions