COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF INHALATION DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES IN COPD AND BRONCHIAL ASTHMA PATIENTS

Authors

  • O. V. Ilchyshyn I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • N. I. Reha I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2411-1597.2024.3.15000

Keywords:

COPD, bronchial asthma, bronchial obstructive syndrome, inhalation therapy, delivery device, inhaler, nebuliser

Abstract

Introduction. In recent decades, inhalation therapy has reached a qualitatively new level due to the widespread use of more advanced auxiliary devices for inhalation drug administration to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma. It has been proven that direct delivery of drugs to the respiratory tract minimizes the development of systemic side effects.

The aim of the study – to consider the advantages and disadvantages of various additions to inhalation therapy devices. To justify the expediency of modernizing compressor inhalers with their translation into aerosol generation mode in accordance with the phases of the respiratory cycle.

The main part. The success of inhalation therapy depends not only on the correct choice of the drug, but also on an adequate method of its delivery to the respiratory tract. The main goal of inhalation therapy is to achieve the maximum local therapeutic effect in the respiratory tract with minimal or no side effects. However, approximately 1/3 of patients with bronchial obstructive diseases perform inhalations with serious technical errors. As a result of incorrect inhalation techniques, the drug enters the airways in insufficient quantities, leading to poor disease control and frequent exacerbations. Nebuliser therapy is an alternative method of drug delivery. In this regard, the nebuliser is the device of choice for young children and patients with severe respiratory function impairments. The capabilities of nebulisers have significantly expanded the scope of inhalation therapy. However, a significant disadvantage of these devices is their relatively large size, the need for a  power source and often quite high cost. In addition, the use of a mask increases the loss of the drug, as the device operates in a continuous mode, while the patient does not inhale constantly. Consequently, this leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of therapy, an undesirable increase in the cost of treatment due to the loss of expensive drugs, as well as environmental pollution, which can also have an undesirable impact on others and medical staff, for example, cause an allergic reaction.

Conclusions. Inhalation therapy is a modern and effective method of treating most diseases of the respiratory tract, as it allows for local therapy by delivering drugs directly into the respiratory tract, maintaining a high concentration of active substances directly in the focus of inflammation, and reducing the risk of systemic side effects. Nebulizer therapy has a number of advantages over other types of inhalers, but there are also a number of disadvantages, the elimination of which will significantly facilitate and improve the treatment of patients. The development of inhalers capable of generating an aerosol in accordance with the phases of the patients’ respiratory cycle can be considered promising.

References

Dziublyk, Y.A., Bororova, O.L., Patiuk, Y.O. (2021). Dotsilnist ta bezpeka zastosuvannia nebulaizernoi terapii u patsiientiv z infektsiinymy zakhvoriuvanniamy dykhalnykh shliakhiv u period pandemii COVID-19. [Expediency and safety of nebuliser therapy in patients with infectious respiratory diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Ukrayinskyi pulmonolohichnyi zhurnal - Ukrainian pulmonology journal, 1, 31-38. DOI: 10.31215/2306-4927-2021-29-1-31-38 [in Ukrainian].

Tkachova, T.M., Okhotnikova, O.M. (2017). Osnovy inhaliatsiinoi terapii. Prystroi, shcho dostavliaiut likarski zasoby v dykhalni shliakhy. [Fundamentals of inhalation therapy. Devices that deliver drugs to the respiratory tract]. Clinical immunology. Allergology. Infectology, 2(99), 18-31 [in Ukrainian].

Chrystyn, H., Haahtela, T., (2020). Easyhaler. Produktova monohrafiya [Easyhaler. Product monograph]. Kyiv, 57 p. [in Ukrainian].

Chrystyn, H. (2006). Closer to an “ideal inhaler” with the Easyhaler. An innovative dry powder inhaler. Clin Drug Invest, 26, 175183. DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200626040-00001.

Chrystyn, H., Price, D. (2009). Not all asthma inhalers are the same: factors to consider when prescribing an inhaler. Prim Care Respir J., 18(4), 243-249. DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00029.

Crompton, G.K., et al. (2006). The need to improve inhalation technique in Europe: a report from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team. Respir Med., 100(9), 1479-1494. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.01.008.

Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. (2021). Retrieved from: www.ginasthma.org (last accessed 17.11.2021).

Ashurst, I.I., et al. (2000). Latest advances in the development of dry powder inhalers. Pharm Sci Technol Today, 3(7), 246-256. DOI: 10.1016/s1461-5347(00)00275-3.

Nakaz MOZ Ukrayiny № 499 vid 28.10.2003. “Pro zatverdzhennya instruktsiy shchodo nadannya dopomohy khvorym na tuberkul'oz i nespetsyfichni zakhvoryuvannya lehen' [Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine No. 499 of 28.10.2003. ‘On Approval of Instructions for Providing Care to Patients with Tuberculosis and Nonspecific Lung Diseases’].

Eber, E., Midulla, F. (2013). Paediatric Respiratory Medicine: handbook. European Respiratory Society, 1, 719.

Geller, D.E. (2005). Comparing Clinical Features of the Nebulizer, Metered-Dose Inhaler, and Dry Powder Inhaler. Respiratory Care, 1313-1322.

Laube, B.L. (2011). What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. Eur Respir J., 13-31.

Boe, J., Dennis, J.H., O’Drisscol, B.R. (2001). Europian Respiratory Society Guidelines on the use of Nebulizers. ERJ, 228-42.

Pirozynski, M., Sosnowski, T.R. (2016). Inhalation devices: from basic science to practical use, innovative vs generic products. Еxpert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 13(11), 1559-1571.

Lass, J.S. (2006). New advances in aerosolised drug delivery: vibrating membrane nebuliser technology. Еxpert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 3(5), 693-702.

Hess, D.R. (2008). Aerosol delivery devices in the treatment of asthma. Respir Care, 53(6), 699-723.

Boe, J., Dennis, J.H., Driscoll, B.R., et al. (2001). European Respiratory Society Guidelines on the use of nebulisers. Eur. Respir. J., 18, 228-242.

Published

2024-12-11

How to Cite

Ilchyshyn, O. V., & Reha, N. I. (2024). COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF INHALATION DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES IN COPD AND BRONCHIAL ASTHMA PATIENTS. Nursing, (3), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.11603/2411-1597.2024.3.15000

Issue

Section

Articles