Principle 80/20 on the assessment of nutrient potential in endoprosthetic treatment of conjunctivitis osteo-implant prothetic system

Authors

  • M. V. Kasianchuk Bukovіnian State Medical University, Chernivtsi Private specialized medical practice, Chernivtsi
  • N. I. Bielikova Yu. Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • P. M. Fochuk Private specialized medical practice, Chernivtsi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2022.1.12956

Keywords:

dentistry, endodontics, implantology, biogenic potential, Pareto principle, prosthetic rehabilitation, angular dental implants

Abstract

Summary. The article considers the current problem of modern dental implantology - odontology and osteology, namely: stabilization of bone remodeling for dental implants, prosthetic value of discrete implants after endo-preservation of preserved teeth on the background of pathology, clinical manifestations of Costru-19 and in the human body with the limitations and features of wartime.

The aim of the study – to study the effectiveness of prosthetic methods on angular and short implants as a means of stabilizing atrophic processes of anatomical structures after tooth loss, as well as the dispersion of factors influencing the stabilization of bone remodeling in the postimplantation period.

Materials and Methods. The authors proposed to apply the 80/20 principle of the Italian scientist Pareto in assessing the diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients.

Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation after endodontic treatment (preservation of the roots of depulped teeth) means the use of integrated into the bone tissue conjunctival system of prosthetic structures of bone materials and artificial substitutes for cell processes based on implants, taking into account the laws. The essence of the method is to use the titanium infrastructure (implant) of the intra- and meso-structure of the implant (international titanium standard ASTM F67-89 Grade-5 is used in the manufacture of structural elements of the implant system "U-Impl"), and the surrounding area as an analogue of lost tooth and filling of apical and periapical tissues (anatomical structures).

Results and Discussion. The clinician was offered a discrete conjunctival system of dental implant and prosthetic mesostructure. And also the organization of researches taking into account influence of pathogenic factors. The use of this type of manipulation will allow a more rational approach to the problem of organ-preserving surgical interventions in dentistry. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implantation method, the objective indicators of bone atrophy in patients of the main and control groups were studied: the degree of vertical resorption of bone tissue during 12 months of observation of patients.

Conclusions. Insignificant signs of atrophy after stabilization remodeling of cellular processes of jaws were diagnosed in persons after application of the offered technique. Thus, the 80/20 principle is also valid in the medical examination of vital surgical interventions and predictor method of vital examination of human biogenic potential.

References

Koch, R. (2018). Pryntsyp 80/20. Perekl. z ang. N. Lavska [Principle 80/20.Transl. from Eng. N. Lavska]. – Kyiv : Vydav.gr. KM-BOOKS, [in Ukrainian].

Kasiyanchuk, M.V., & Uhryn, M.M. (2009). Sposib vuhotovlennia protetychnoyi konstruktsiyi na implantakh U-impl. Pat. Ukrayiny № 40621 [A method of manufacturing a prosthetic structure on U-impl implants. Patent of Ukraine No. 40621.] [in Ukrainian].

Kasiyanchuk, M., Fochuk, P., Ostapov, S., Pshenichka, P., & Kasiyanchuk, Y. (2013). Medical navigation as a method of preclinical investigation optimization in oral osteoplastic surgical intervention. International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine, 1, 220.

Zoeller, J, Kasiyanchuk, M, Fochuk, P, & Kasiyanchuk, R. (2013). Conservation method of bone adaptive opportunities during oral osteoplastic surgical intervention. Switzerland: Osteology Foundation, Lucerne. Retrieved from: https://box.osteology.org/User/MyResearch.

Kasiyanchuk, M.V. (2018). Protezuvannia na implantakh iak metod zberezhennia biohennoho (osteohennoho) potentsialu [Implant prosthetics as a method of preserving biogenic (osteogenic) potential]. Novyny stomatolohii – Dentistry News, 1, 8, 15 [in Ukrainian].

Kasiyanchuk, M.V. (2017). Zastosuvannia pryntsypu dyskretnosti pry protezuvanni na implantati [Application of the principle of discreteness in prosthetics on implants] Materialy naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi «Innovatsiyni tekhnolohii v suchasniy stomatolohii» – Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference. “Innovative technologies in modern dentistry”. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Smith, D. (2017). Dumaty iak Albert Eynshteyn – Think like Albert Einstein. Kyiv: KM-Books [in Ukrainian].

Farion I. (2020). Slovotvirni normy v konteksti natsionalno-kulturnykh oriyentatsiy [Word-forming norms in the context of national and cultural orientations] TOV "IPEM" [in Ukrainian].

Farion, I.D. (2021). Movna polityka v Ukraini: do problem natsionalnoyi zrilosti [Language policy in Ukraine: to the problem of national maturity]. International scientific and practical conference «Philological sciences, intercultural communication and translation studies: an experience and challenges»: conferece proceeding, April 23-24. Czestochowa : “Baltija Publishing” [in Ukrainian].

Farion, I.D., Mukharsky, A., & Belskaya, Ye. (2021). Mova siohodni – tsina zhyttia. Yak pereyty na ukrayinsku [Language today - the price of life. How to switch to Ukrainian]. Zbirka avtobiohrafichnykh rozpovidey ta praktychnykh porad – Collection of autobiographical stories and practical advice. Kyiv: UKRIDEABOOK.COM.UA [in Ukrainian].

Savchuk, K.O., & Smoliy, V.A. (2005). Implementatsiya [Implementation]. Entsyklopediya istoriyi Ukrayiny: u 10 t. – Encyclopedia of the History of Ukraine: in 10 volumes. Кyiv: Naukova Dumka,: il. - ISBN 966-00-0610-1 [in Ukrainian].

Giannobile, W, & Lang, M Tonetti Meditors. (2014). Osteology Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Regeneration: Clinical Research. 1st ed. Germany: Quintessence Publishing.

Engquist, B., Astrand, P., & Dahlgren, S. (2002). Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark System implants. Clin. Oral implants. Res.

Published

2022-05-26

How to Cite

Kasianchuk, M. V., Bielikova, N. I., & Fochuk, P. M. (2022). Principle 80/20 on the assessment of nutrient potential in endoprosthetic treatment of conjunctivitis osteo-implant prothetic system. CLINICAL DENTISTRY, (1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2022.1.12956

Issue

Section

Ortopedic stomatology