Endodontic-endosteal implantation in modern dentistry: opportunities, problems and prospects for the application of the method (literature review)

Authors

  • P. P. Brechlichuk Uzhhorod National University
  • P. O. Maistruk Uzhhorod National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2019.4.10877

Keywords:

endodontic-endosteal implantation, dental treatment, expert evaluation

Abstract

Endodontic-endosteal implantation is a well-known method of tooth reinforcement and improvement of its biomechanical stability parameters after surgical intervention with root apex resection. Despite the positive clinical experience, the method is not widespread in dental practice due to the complexity and imperfection of the endodontic-endosteal implantation procedure, the absence of clear indications for its use, short term functioning of the structures in the oral cavity, problems with osseointegration of the implants installed through the endodontist.

The aim of the study – to provide comprehensive analysis of available domestic and foreign data regarding the possibilities, problems of implementation and further prospects of using the method of endodontic-endosteal implantation in modern dental practice.

Materials and Methods. The systematization of scientific publications relevant to the aim of the study was based on Google Scholar search queries by keywords (“endodontic-endosteal implantation”, “endodontic implants”, “transdental implantation” and their analogs in Russian and English).

Results and Discussion. The most important aspects of the endodontic-endosteal implantation procedure according to the literature that need to be consider in clinical practice are the following: assessment of the tooth condition, through which the EEI will be directly installed; assessment of the tooth mobility degree; assessment of the interveolar septa resorption degree; estimation of the number of teeth that have an urgent need for implantation; evaluation of the postoperative bone defect size and the possibility of its replacement by osteoplastic material.

Conclusions. According to the available clinical and laboratory data, the use of endodontic-endosteal implantation can be considered as an alternative approach to optimize biomechanical stability and ensure a favorable functional prognosis of the tooth after procedures with resection of part of the root in the presence of pathological or postoperative tissue defect. A lack of data on the possibilities of using the method of endodontic-endosteal implantation in clinical dental practice, the relatively low level of evidence of the presented results of previous studies and the lack of clear protocols for the implementation of this method during different clinical conditions were identified during review of the literature.

References

Klitynska, O.V. (2017). Funktsionalno-orhanizatsiina model profilaktyky ta likuvannia kariiesu v ditei Zakarpatskoi oblasti [Functional organizational model of prevention and treatment caries in children Transcarpathian region]. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii – Ukraine. Health of Nation, 3, 134-139 [in Ukrainian].

Melnyk, V.S., Izai, M.E., & Duhanchyk, Ya.I. (2016). Analiz poshyrenosti zakhvoriuvan zuboshchelepnoi systemy, yaki formuiut popyt na stomatolohichni posluhy [Analysis of the prevalence of diseases of the dentition, which form the demand for dental services]. Molodyi vchenyi – Young Scientist, 40 (12.1), 166-169 [in Ukrainian].

Savychuk, N.O., & Klitynska, O.V. (2008). Stomatolohichne zdorovia ditei, metodolohichni pidkhody ta kryterii yoho otsinky [Dental health of the children, methodological approaches and criteria for evaluation]. Sovremennaya stomatologiya – Modern Dentistry, (1), 94-98 [in Ukrainian].

Friedman, S., & Mor, C. (2004). The success of endodontic therapy healing and functionality. CDA J, 32(6), 493-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2004.12223997

Sathorn, C., Parashos, P., & Messer, H.H. (2005). Effectiveness of single versus multiple visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta analysis. International Endodontic Journal, 38 (6), 347-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00955.x

Torabinejad, M., Corr, R., Handysides, R., & Shabahang, S. (2009). Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 35 (7), 930-937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023

Márton, I.J., & Kiss, C. (2014). Overlapping protective and destructive regulatory pathways in apical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics, 40 (2), 155-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.036

Ørstavik, D., & Ford, T.P. (Eds.). (2020). Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard.

Gutmann, J.L., & Levermann Manjarres, V. (2013). Endodontic endosseous implants (diodontic or through the tooth implants). ENDO (London), 7, 299-304.

Yadav, R.K., Tikku, A.P., Chandra, A., & Wadhwani, K.K. (2014). Endodontic implants. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 5 (1), 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.140183

Maystruk, P.O. (2013). Osobennosti primeneniya endodonto-endoossalnoy implantatsii v stomatologii [Usage peculiarities of endodonto-endoossal implants in modern dentistry]. Stomatolog. Minsk – Dentist. Minsk, 3 (10), 85-87 [in Russian].

Maistruk, P.O. (2013). Analiz osnovnykh metodiv stabilizatsii zubiv [Analysis of main methods for teeth stabilization]. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny – Bulletin of Problems in Biology and Medicine, 3 (2), 25-29.

Weine, F.S., & Frank, A.L. (1993). Survival of the endodontic endosseous implant. Journal of Endodontics, 19 (10), 524-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81496-2

Gizatullin, R., Arsenev, P.A., Borisenko, N.Y., Gunderov, D.V., Gufynkel, L. N., Sokov, L.P., ... & Chekhovoy, A.N. (2008). Endodonto-endossalnaya implantatsiya nanokompozytsyonnimy implantatamy s pamyatyu formu v lechenii bolnikh destruktyvnimy periodontami [Endodontic-endosal implantiation of nanocomposed implants with a memory of form in treatments of destructive periodontitis]. Kazanskyy meditsynskiy zhurnal – Kazan Medical Journal, 89 (5), 720-724 [in Russian].

Danylina, T.F., Ogrina, N.A., Kolesova, T.V., & Naumova, V.N. (2007). Obosnovanye kompleksnoy metodiky lecheniya endodonto-endoossalnoy implantatsii s prymenenyem porystoy hidroksyapa­tytnoy keramiky [Argumentation of complex treatment method of endodontic-endosteal implantation with the use of porous hydroxyapatite ceramics]. Elektronnyy nauchno-obrazovatelniy vestnyk “Zdorovye i obrazovanye v XXI veke” – Electronic Scientific-Education Bulletin “Health and Education in XXI Century”,

(6), 226

Fathi, M. H., Salehi, M., Mortazavi, V., Mousavi, S. B., & Parsapour, A. (2006). Novel hydroxyapatite/niobium surface coating for endodontic dental implant. Surface Engineering, 22 (5), 353-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329406X126708

Parreira, F.R., Bramwell, J.D., Roahen, J.O., & Giambarresi, L. (1996). Histological response to titanium endodontic endosseous implants in dogs. Journal of Endodontics, 22 (4), 161-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80092-6

Mittal, S., Kumar, T., Aggarwal, V., Bansal, R., & Kaur, D. (2011). Endodontic stabilizers for treating mid root fractures. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, 1 (2), 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5194.85030

Aguilera-Galaviz, L., Larios-Cervantes, A., Flores-Reyes, H., Baltazar, V., & Gaitan-Fonseca, C. (2019). Trans-endodontic zirconium oxide implants: A clinical alternative. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences, 21 (1), 15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v21i1.34661

Dzhalalova, M.V., & Stepanov, A. H. (2017). Vliyanye urovnya rezektsiy kornya zuba na napryazhenno-deformirovannoye sostoyanye endodonto-endoossalnogo implantata v zubochelyustnom segmente [Influence of tooth root resection level on stress-strain state of en­dodontic endosseous implant in dentoalveolar segment]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal biomekhaniki – Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 21 (1), 51-63 [in Russian].

Mytchenok, O.V. (2008). Vykorystannia morfometrychnykh pokaznykiv rozmiriv koronok i koreniv zubiv pry vyhotovlenni endodonto-endoosalnykh implantativ [Use of morphometric para­meters of crown and roots size during endodonto endosseous implant fabrication]. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh – Ukrainian Dental Almanac, (3), 12-14 [in Ukrainian].

Bazykyan, E.A., Mytronin, A. V., Maksy­movskyy, Yu.M., Robustova, T.H., & Bazykyan, O.A. (2007). Aspekty prymeneniya transdentalnykh implantatov v konservativnoy i operativnoy khirurgii zubov [Aspects of transdental implants use during conservative and operative surgery of the teeth]. Institut stomatologii – Institute of Dentistry, 1 (34), 36-38 [in Russian].

Parmar, G., & Pramodkumar, A. V. (2000). Custom-fabricated endodontic implants: report of two Cases. Journal of Endodontics, 26 (5), 301-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200005000-00015

Thiyagarajah, N., Ramesh, S., & Raj, J.D. (2015) Endodontic stabilizers: A myth. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 7 (2), 132-135

Published

2020-02-17

How to Cite

Brechlichuk, P. P., & Maistruk, P. O. (2020). Endodontic-endosteal implantation in modern dentistry: opportunities, problems and prospects for the application of the method (literature review). CLINICAL DENTISTRY, (4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2019.4.10877

Issue

Section

Surgical stomatology