MEDICAL ERRORS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF PHYSICIANS IN TERNOPIL REGION (UKRAINE)
Background. The professional occupation of a doctor quite often meets different imperfections, which have negative outcome for patients.
Objective. The study was aimed to investigate the expert characteristics of improper performance of the professional duties by medical staff on the example of a particular region of Ukraine.
Methods. In the study the archival materials (commission on forensic medical examinations) held in Ternopil Regional Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination in 2007-2014 years were analysed. The research results are summarized and processed with the use of general statistical methods.
Results. It is defined that during this period 112 examinations concerning medical malpractice were implemented (9.05% of all commission examinations).
Conclusions. Medical errors were combined, especially during the diagnostics, treatment and in medical records. The majority of cases (82.1%) of medical malpractice were caused by the objective reasons.
James, John T. A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care. Journal of Patient Safety 2013; 9(3): 122–128.
Shepherd R. Medical malpractice (in). Simpson’s Forensic medicine. London. Arnold publisher; 2003: 15–26.
Narayan Reddy K.S. Professional negligence (malpraxis) (in). The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. Hyderabad. K. Suguna Devi publisher; 2006: 30–45.
Sorensen B, Lynnerup N. Fatal outcome after unintended events following medical intervention: a forensic pathological case survey. RRFMS 2014; 4: 11–17.
Anupam B. Jena, Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla, Amitabh Chandra. Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 629–636.
Meng You, Xu Wang, Di Lu, Haidong Zhang, Shengli Di, Fengqin Zhang et al. Analyses of Medical Malpractice in Judicial Appraisal: 505 Cases. Forensic Sci Med 2015; 1: 21–25.
Authors who sent their manuscript to International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY-NC that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).